ATL: SAM - Remnants - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
InfernoFlameCat
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2102
Age: 22
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2020 10:52 am
Location: Buford, GA

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1801 Postby InfernoFlameCat » Wed Sep 29, 2021 10:28 pm

grapealcoholic wrote:Trends looks good for it to get to Cat 5

Maybe. I need to see deeper convection before I fall on the 5 train.
4 likes   
I am by no means a professional. DO NOT look at my forecasts for official information or make decisions based on what I post.

Goal: to become a registered expert over tropical and subtropical cyclones.

storminabox
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 263
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2017 10:50 pm

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1802 Postby storminabox » Wed Sep 29, 2021 10:30 pm

InfernoFlameCat wrote:
grapealcoholic wrote:Trends looks good for it to get to Cat 5

Maybe. I need to see deeper convection before I fall on the 5 train.


I personally don’t see it becoming a 5, but I’d be happy to proven wrong! (Since only the fishes are getting impacted)
1 likes   

User avatar
Iceresistance
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9279
Age: 21
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2020 9:45 am
Location: Tecumseh, OK/Norman, OK

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1803 Postby Iceresistance » Wed Sep 29, 2021 10:34 pm

They literally said this in the Discussion:

It sounds like a broken record, but there are no changes to the forecast during the
first few days as model guidance is in excellent agreement on a
gradually rightward-curving track, passing a couple of hundred n mi
or more east of Bermuda.
1 likes   
Bill 2015 & Beta 2020

Winter 2020-2021 :cold:

All observations are in Tecumseh, OK unless otherwise noted.

Winter posts are focused mainly for Oklahoma & Texas.

Take any of my forecasts with a grain of salt, refer to the NWS, SPC, and NHC for official information

Never say Never with weather! Because ANYTHING is possible!

grapealcoholic
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 684
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2021 3:26 pm

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1804 Postby grapealcoholic » Wed Sep 29, 2021 10:36 pm

InfernoFlameCat wrote:
grapealcoholic wrote:Trends looks good for it to get to Cat 5

Maybe. I need to see deeper convection before I fall on the 5 train.

Yea structure wise it looks much better than earlier. I think convection will come next
3 likes   

Sciencerocks
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8903
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1805 Postby Sciencerocks » Wed Sep 29, 2021 10:38 pm

Image
1 likes   

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3168
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1806 Postby Teban54 » Wed Sep 29, 2021 10:58 pm

InfernoFlameCat wrote:
grapealcoholic wrote:Trends looks good for it to get to Cat 5

Maybe. I need to see deeper convection before I fall on the 5 train.

I mean, deep convection isn't there probably because this is not a Cat 5 yet. I expect convective bursts to come shortly if Sam is still intensifying.
0 likes   

User avatar
ElectricStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5017
Age: 24
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1807 Postby ElectricStorm » Wed Sep 29, 2021 11:16 pm

940.6mb extrap on the first pass
0 likes   
I am in no way a professional. Take what I say with a grain of salt as I could be totally wrong. Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.

Boomer Sooner!

us89
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 399
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2019 11:12 pm
Location: Tallahassee, FL

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1808 Postby us89 » Wed Sep 29, 2021 11:18 pm

al182021 SAM 20210930 0000 20.3 -58.0 L HU 125 940


00z point revised from 120kt/942mb to 125kt/940mb.
3 likes   

User avatar
ElectricStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5017
Age: 24
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1809 Postby ElectricStorm » Wed Sep 29, 2021 11:20 pm

Almost 140kt FL winds. SFMR is much lower but most of them are flagged
0 likes   
I am in no way a professional. Take what I say with a grain of salt as I could be totally wrong. Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.

Boomer Sooner!

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3168
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1810 Postby Teban54 » Wed Sep 29, 2021 11:25 pm

Weather Dude wrote:Almost 140kt FL winds. SFMR is much lower but most of them are flagged

Due to SFMR's high bias, at this point it's becoming less useful if not thrown out of window entirely.
Last edited by Teban54 on Wed Sep 29, 2021 11:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   

grapealcoholic
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 684
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2021 3:26 pm

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1811 Postby grapealcoholic » Wed Sep 29, 2021 11:26 pm

That's a thick band of 135+ FL. Just needs to tighten up

138 107 000 05
139 110 000 05
139 /// /// 03
137 104 000 03
134 101 000 05
0 likes   

User avatar
ElectricStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5017
Age: 24
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1812 Postby ElectricStorm » Wed Sep 29, 2021 11:27 pm

Eye drop supports 942mb
0 likes   
I am in no way a professional. Take what I say with a grain of salt as I could be totally wrong. Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.

Boomer Sooner!

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5849
Age: 41
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1813 Postby Hammy » Wed Sep 29, 2021 11:54 pm

Teban54 wrote:
Weather Dude wrote:Almost 140kt FL winds. SFMR is much lower but most of them are flagged

Due to SFMR's high bias, at this point it's becoming less useful if not thrown out of window entirely.


Seems they're already doing so--would explain why they use flight wind reduction above a certain point.
2 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

NotoSans
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1380
Age: 25
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2015 1:15 am
Location: Toronto
Contact:

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1814 Postby NotoSans » Thu Sep 30, 2021 12:17 am

The large discrepancy between SMFR and flight-level winds can be explained by two factors: (a) deep convection is not particularly strong at the moment, so winds may not be effectively mixing down to the surface; (b) Sam has just completed an ERC, and it will take time for the surface wind field to respond.

NHC’s 125kt is a good compromise.
6 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to RSMC and NWS products.

User avatar
InfernoFlameCat
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2102
Age: 22
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2020 10:52 am
Location: Buford, GA

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1815 Postby InfernoFlameCat » Thu Sep 30, 2021 12:18 am

Convection is slowly cooling...
Exciting!
0 likes   
I am by no means a professional. DO NOT look at my forecasts for official information or make decisions based on what I post.

Goal: to become a registered expert over tropical and subtropical cyclones.

grapealcoholic
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 684
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2021 3:26 pm

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1816 Postby grapealcoholic » Thu Sep 30, 2021 12:27 am

It's forecast to pass over a warm eddy in a few hours
0 likes   

User avatar
Extratropical94
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3538
Age: 30
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 6:36 am
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Contact:

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1817 Postby Extratropical94 » Thu Sep 30, 2021 12:50 am

938.3 mb extrapolated, 128kt FL NW, 139kt FL SE
5 likes   
54° 11' 59'' N, 9° 9' 20'' E
Boomer Sooner!
Go Broncos! Go Cards! Go Niners!
- Daniel

User avatar
kevin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2554
Age: 26
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:35 am

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1818 Postby kevin » Thu Sep 30, 2021 2:05 am

Wow, new pass 934.5 mbar also with 139 FL winds and that pressure was with 35.8 kt Est. Sfc. Wind. So current intensity is at least 935mb/125kt using a 0.9 conversion factor. This is definitely deepening very rapidly and I think it puts a cat 5 back on the table.
3 likes   

grapealcoholic
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 684
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2021 3:26 pm

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1819 Postby grapealcoholic » Thu Sep 30, 2021 2:14 am

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3168
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1820 Postby Teban54 » Thu Sep 30, 2021 2:44 am

kevin wrote:Wow, new pass 934.5 mbar also with 139 FL winds and that pressure was with 35.8 kt Est. Sfc. Wind. So current intensity is at least 935mb/125kt using a 0.9 conversion factor. This is definitely deepening very rapidly and I think it puts a cat 5 back on the table.

Eye drop at 938/14 so not as crazy, but if the deeping rate of ~1.7mb/hr continues, Sam might hit the MPI again some time during the day.

It seems that the impressive 150kt winds at ~925mb are not quite mixing down to the surface. Probably need more intense convection for that.
0 likes   


Return to “2021”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests