ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139087
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#1 Postby cycloneye » Tue Aug 03, 2021 10:31 am

AL, 91, 2021080312, , BEST, 0, 129N, 237W, 20, 1011, LO, 0, , 0, 0, 0, 0, 1014, 120, 30, 0, 0, L, 0, , 0, 0, INVEST, S, 0, , 0, 0, 0, 0, genesis-num, 017, SPAWNINVEST, al782021 to al912021,


https://ftp.nhc.noaa.gov/atcf/aid_public/
1 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

MarioProtVI
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 670
Age: 22
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2019 7:33 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#2 Postby MarioProtVI » Tue Aug 03, 2021 10:41 am

This seems to be doing exactly what 10L did last year: pinching off into a small low from the broader trough and quickly spinup into a short-lived TD/TS near Cape Verde. ASCAT and satellite shows the circulation is slowly getting better defined with the latest burst. 18z TWO probably 30/30 or 40/40 with the usual “if trends continue, a short-lived tropical depression may form before moving into unfavorable conditions”.
1 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22482
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#3 Postby wxman57 » Tue Aug 03, 2021 11:10 am

Looks like a small eddy that will soon dissipate. Very common with waves moving off the coast of Africa.
6 likes   

User avatar
HurricaneEnzo
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 723
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2018 12:18 pm
Location: Newport, NC (Hurricane Alley)

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#4 Postby HurricaneEnzo » Tue Aug 03, 2021 11:31 am

It's running out of warm enough water real fast. As soon as it hits the Cabo Verde Islands it will be in 25C waters. I don't think it has enough time.
Last edited by HurricaneEnzo on Tue Aug 03, 2021 11:34 am, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   
Bertha 96' - Fran 96' - Bonnie 98' - Dennis 99' - Floyd 99' - Isabel 03' - Alex 04' - Ophelia 05' - Irene 11' - Arthur 14' - Matthew 16' - Florence 18' - Dorian 19' - Isaias 20' (countless other tropical storms and Hurricane swipes)

I am not a Professional Met just an enthusiast. Get your weather forecasts from the Pros!

User avatar
InfernoFlameCat
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1966
Age: 21
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2020 10:52 am
Location: Buford, GA

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#5 Postby InfernoFlameCat » Tue Aug 03, 2021 11:32 am

wxman57 wrote:Looks like a small eddy that will soon dissipate. Very common with waves moving off the coast of Africa.

It will have to immediately strengthen or otherwise pull a wave and turn into this small disturbance. Does look like an eddy though. Love the analogy.
0 likes   
I am by no means a professional. DO NOT look at my forecasts for official information or make decisions based on what I post.

Goal: to become a registered expert over tropical and subtropical cyclones.

User avatar
Hypercane_Kyle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2900
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#6 Postby Hypercane_Kyle » Tue Aug 03, 2021 11:42 am

I'd put the odds for this one near zero. We're getting towards the time of the year where conditions are more favorable, but not quite there yet.
4 likes   
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.

User avatar
HurricaneEnzo
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 723
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2018 12:18 pm
Location: Newport, NC (Hurricane Alley)

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#7 Postby HurricaneEnzo » Tue Aug 03, 2021 11:44 am

Also appears to be a couple of small areas of rotation. Looks like it is barfing out an eddy right now. Not very organized + cold water coming = nada.
0 likes   
Bertha 96' - Fran 96' - Bonnie 98' - Dennis 99' - Floyd 99' - Isabel 03' - Alex 04' - Ophelia 05' - Irene 11' - Arthur 14' - Matthew 16' - Florence 18' - Dorian 19' - Isaias 20' (countless other tropical storms and Hurricane swipes)

I am not a Professional Met just an enthusiast. Get your weather forecasts from the Pros!

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4928
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#8 Postby Nimbus » Tue Aug 03, 2021 11:53 am

If it gathers a center with convection a little further south near the ITCZ as it moves west it might have a small chance later.
The tail end of the cold front off the west coast of Florida has a small chance but they didn't declare an invest for that yet.
0 likes   

Sciencerocks
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7286
Age: 38
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#9 Postby Sciencerocks » Tue Aug 03, 2021 12:00 pm

Image
1 likes   

User avatar
abajan
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4175
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 5:10 am
Location: Barbados

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#10 Postby abajan » Tue Aug 03, 2021 12:23 pm

So, the 5-day formation chance decreased from 20% to 10%, but it's now an invest. Interesting.
I guess we can reasonably expect that percentage to go back up shortly.
0 likes   

User avatar
abajan
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4175
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 5:10 am
Location: Barbados

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#11 Postby abajan » Tue Aug 03, 2021 12:36 pm

5-day formation chance still at 10%:

Tropical Weather Outlook
NWS National Hurricane Center Miami FL
200 PM EDT Tue Aug 3 2021

For the North Atlantic...Caribbean Sea and the Gulf of Mexico:

A small area of low pressure with some associated showers and
thunderstorms is located about 100 miles south of Praia in the Cabo
Verde Islands. Significant development of this system is not
expected during the next day or two due to unfavorable upper-level
winds and marginally warm waters. The low is forecast to move
northward or north-northwestward through Thursday before the system
moves over cool waters, ending development chances. Locally heavy
rainfall and gusty winds are possible over portions of the Cabo
Verde Islands through Wednesday.
* Formation chance through 48 hours...low...10 percent.
* Formation chance through 5 days...low...10 percent.

A tropical wave is forecast to move off the west coast of Africa by
late Thursday. This system has the potential for slow development
over the far eastern Atlantic through the weekend while it moves
westward at about 15 mph.
* Formation chance through 48 hours...low...near 0 percent.
* Formation chance through 5 days...low...20 percent.

$$
Forecaster Blake
Last edited by abajan on Tue Aug 03, 2021 12:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

AutoPenalti
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Age: 27
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#12 Postby AutoPenalti » Tue Aug 03, 2021 12:39 pm


I believe it's an invest because of proximity to land.
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.


Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)

TCVN
is a weighted averaged

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22482
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#13 Postby wxman57 » Tue Aug 03, 2021 12:41 pm

abajan wrote:So, the 5-day formation chance decreased from 20% to 10%, but it's now an invest. Interesting.
I guess we can reasonably expect that percentage to go back up shortly.


The NHC declaring any area an "invest" has nothing to do with development potential (or proximity to land). They just want to run models on it to see what they say. You should not infer that the NHC thinks something is a development threat just because an invest is initiated. I expect development chances to drop to zero after Stewart gets off shift at the NHC.
3 likes   

AutoPenalti
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Age: 27
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#14 Postby AutoPenalti » Tue Aug 03, 2021 12:44 pm

wxman57 wrote:
abajan wrote:So, the 5-day formation chance decreased from 20% to 10%, but it's now an invest. Interesting.
I guess we can reasonably expect that percentage to go back up shortly.


The NHC declaring any area an "invest" has nothing to do with development potential (or proximity to land). They just want to run models on it to see what they say. You should not infer that the NHC thinks something is a development threat just because an invest is initiated. I expect development chances to drop to zero after Stewart gets off shift at the NHC.

Couldn't they just run models without an Invest designation?
2 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.


Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)

TCVN
is a weighted averaged

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139087
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#15 Postby cycloneye » Tue Aug 03, 2021 12:44 pm

A small area of low pressure with some associated showers and
thunderstorms is located about 100 miles south of Praia in the Cabo
Verde Islands. Significant development of this system is not
expected during the next day or two due to unfavorable upper-level
winds and marginally warm waters. The low is forecast to move
northward or north-northwestward through Thursday before the system
moves over cool waters, ending development chances. Locally heavy
rainfall and gusty winds are possible over portions of the Cabo
Verde Islands through Wednesday.
* Formation chance through 48 hours...low...10 percent.
* Formation chance through 5 days...low...10 percent.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23499
Age: 46
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#16 Postby gatorcane » Tue Aug 03, 2021 12:46 pm

If this somehow gets to a depression or name storm status, which it shouldn’t, it would just inflate the numbers considering something this minor was not tracked or counted decades ago.
2 likes   

User avatar
HurricaneEnzo
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 723
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2018 12:18 pm
Location: Newport, NC (Hurricane Alley)

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#17 Postby HurricaneEnzo » Tue Aug 03, 2021 12:49 pm

abajan wrote:So, the 5-day formation chance decreased from 20% to 10%, but it's now an invest. Interesting.
I guess we can reasonably expect that percentage to go back up shortly.


Guess they just don't want to be rusty when the switch flips lol. Or they needed something to do with the lull in activity. They had been going just about non-stop since last season before we hit this drought the last few weeks. It must have gotten boring. :lol:
1 likes   
Bertha 96' - Fran 96' - Bonnie 98' - Dennis 99' - Floyd 99' - Isabel 03' - Alex 04' - Ophelia 05' - Irene 11' - Arthur 14' - Matthew 16' - Florence 18' - Dorian 19' - Isaias 20' (countless other tropical storms and Hurricane swipes)

I am not a Professional Met just an enthusiast. Get your weather forecasts from the Pros!

User avatar
NotSparta
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1648
Age: 22
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2017 8:24 am
Location: Naples, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#18 Postby NotSparta » Tue Aug 03, 2021 1:17 pm

gatorcane wrote:If this somehow gets to a depression or name storm status, which it shouldn’t, it would just inflate the numbers considering something this minor was not tracked or counted decades ago.


What's the point of having new and better technology if we don't use it?
11 likes   
This post was probably an opinion of mine, and in no way is official. Please refer to http://www.hurricanes.gov for official tropical analysis and advisories.

My website, with lots of tropical wx graphics, including satellite and recon: http://cyclonicwx.com

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22482
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#19 Postby wxman57 » Tue Aug 03, 2021 2:00 pm

AutoPenalti wrote:
wxman57 wrote:
abajan wrote:So, the 5-day formation chance decreased from 20% to 10%, but it's now an invest. Interesting.
I guess we can reasonably expect that percentage to go back up shortly.


The NHC declaring any area an "invest" has nothing to do with development potential (or proximity to land). They just want to run models on it to see what they say. You should not infer that the NHC thinks something is a development threat just because an invest is initiated. I expect development chances to drop to zero after Stewart gets off shift at the NHC.

Couldn't they just run models without an Invest designation?


No, it's a requirement that model running requires them to define an invest point.
2 likes   

User avatar
kevin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1768
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:35 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#20 Postby kevin » Tue Aug 03, 2021 2:07 pm

NotSparta wrote:
gatorcane wrote:If this somehow gets to a depression or name storm status, which it shouldn’t, it would just inflate the numbers considering something this minor was not tracked or counted decades ago.


What's the point of having new and better technology if we don't use it?


Exactly. It's not the fault of current technology that not all storms could be tracked in the past. While I can understand the annoyance of some people that compared to older seasons the more recent ones seem 'inflated' due to better technology, I don't think we should just ignore these small storms because of that. Just because our technology was insufficient in the past to track some of the storms doesn't mean we should just keep ignoring them now that we can actually detect them. That would mean artificially skewing data to 'what feels right', which is definitely not something I would ever advocate for in any field of science. If it's a TS then it's a TS and the fact that storm tracking and detecting technology was worse in the past shouldn't have anything to do with that. Of course we should keep these things in mind when analyzing and comparing data from seasons in different time periods. Just a general comment btw, not specifically about 91L and its chances of becoming a TD/TS.
5 likes   


Return to “2021”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 75 guests