ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139080
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#1 Postby cycloneye » Sat Aug 07, 2021 2:14 pm

AL, 93, 2021080718, , BEST, 0, 133N, 403W, 20, 1011, LO, 34, NEQ, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1013, 90, 0, 0, 0, L, 0, , 0, 0, INVEST, S, 0, , 0, 0, 0, 0, genesis-num, 019, SPAWNINVEST, al712021 to al932021,


http://hurricanes.ral.ucar.edu/reposito ... 932021.dat
1 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
captainbarbossa19
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1039
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2019 11:09 pm
Location: Starkville, MS

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#2 Postby captainbarbossa19 » Sat Aug 07, 2021 2:17 pm

Glad to see this finally tagged. We could use the perspective of the hurricane models for this since the GFS is wanting to develop this near the Lesser Antilles.
1 likes   

User avatar
ScottNAtlanta
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1998
Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 3:11 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#3 Postby ScottNAtlanta » Sat Aug 07, 2021 2:20 pm

At least now it will be easier to differentiate between them
5 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
ScottNAtlanta
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1998
Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 3:11 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#4 Postby ScottNAtlanta » Sat Aug 07, 2021 2:24 pm

The LLC is very robust and looks to be under an upper high. I am just starting to see some convection firing close to the center
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Category5Kaiju
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3357
Age: 22
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2020 12:45 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#5 Postby Category5Kaiju » Sat Aug 07, 2021 2:24 pm

I have been waiting for this moment. Now it will be easier to have separate discussions about this AOI from 92L or the one near the islands without as much confusion as before.
4 likes   
Unless explicitly stated, all information covered in my posts is based on my opinions and observations. Please refer to a professional meteorologist or an accredited weather research agency otherwise, especially if serious decisions must be made in the event of a potentially life-threatening tropical storm or hurricane.

User avatar
captainbarbossa19
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1039
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2019 11:09 pm
Location: Starkville, MS

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#6 Postby captainbarbossa19 » Sat Aug 07, 2021 2:25 pm

ScottNAtlanta wrote:The LLC is very robust and looks to be under an upper high. I am just starting to see some convection firing close to the center


If convection can build and sustain itself over the LLC, it should not take long for this to be a depression.
0 likes   

User avatar
ElectricStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4541
Age: 23
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#7 Postby ElectricStorm » Sat Aug 07, 2021 2:28 pm

I'm thinking we'll see at least a TS out of this. We are getting closer to peak season so all of these waves will have to be watched...
0 likes   
I am in no way a professional. Take what I say with a grain of salt as I could be totally wrong. Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.

Boomer Sooner!

User avatar
Category5Kaiju
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3357
Age: 22
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2020 12:45 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#8 Postby Category5Kaiju » Sat Aug 07, 2021 2:30 pm

It does not look bad right now. I think a TD by late tomorrow should not be ruled out if its vigor sustains
0 likes   
Unless explicitly stated, all information covered in my posts is based on my opinions and observations. Please refer to a professional meteorologist or an accredited weather research agency otherwise, especially if serious decisions must be made in the event of a potentially life-threatening tropical storm or hurricane.

Sciencerocks
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7286
Age: 38
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#9 Postby Sciencerocks » Sat Aug 07, 2021 2:32 pm

Decent LLC. It needs convection but once that is done it should become something.
Image
4 likes   

User avatar
captainbarbossa19
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1039
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2019 11:09 pm
Location: Starkville, MS

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#10 Postby captainbarbossa19 » Sat Aug 07, 2021 2:38 pm

Category5Kaiju wrote:It does not look bad right now. I think a TD by late tomorrow should not be ruled out if its vigor sustains


If this becomes a depression, the lull on S2K will end and this thread will be filled with posts negative and positive for its development odds. We might even hear from some pro-mets then. :D
1 likes   

AutoPenalti
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Age: 27
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#11 Postby AutoPenalti » Sat Aug 07, 2021 2:38 pm

This caught my attention more than 92L has, however mid level shear looks to be hitting it.
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.


Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)

TCVN
is a weighted averaged

User avatar
captainbarbossa19
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1039
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2019 11:09 pm
Location: Starkville, MS

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#12 Postby captainbarbossa19 » Sat Aug 07, 2021 2:46 pm

AutoPenalti wrote:This caught my attention more than 92L has, however mid level shear looks to be hitting it.


The NHC mentions that this will be moving into more favorable conditions in the next few days, so it might be sometime next week when this finally gets going. Nothing may happen either, but since we are rapidly approaching peak-season, climatology will increase its chances.
0 likes   

AlphaToOmega
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1448
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2021 10:51 am
Location: Somewhere in Massachusetts

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#13 Postby AlphaToOmega » Sat Aug 07, 2021 2:49 pm

It is surrounded by tropical waves both to its West and to its East, so dry air is not a problem. Wind shear is around 10 knots where Invest 93L is. This low has a very good shot at development.
0 likes   

User avatar
Stormybajan
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 428
Joined: Thu May 20, 2021 3:21 pm
Location: Windward Islands

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#14 Postby Stormybajan » Sat Aug 07, 2021 2:53 pm

Sciencerocks wrote:Decent LLC. It needs convection but once that is done it should become something.
https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img922/2983/OxIu69.gif

93L has a good circulation and prominent rotation, thats clear, however it needs to start moving more south-west for a better environment. Atleast thats what the gfs is showing, euro does absolutely nothing with none of the disturbances
0 likes   
Sad West Indies and Manchester United fan ⚽️

User avatar
Category5Kaiju
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3357
Age: 22
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2020 12:45 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#15 Postby Category5Kaiju » Sat Aug 07, 2021 2:55 pm

Of all three AOIs now, this looks like it will be in the most favorable spot for quick development imho; so the mid level shear hitting it currently I highly doubt will really impact its future long term in a negative way
0 likes   
Unless explicitly stated, all information covered in my posts is based on my opinions and observations. Please refer to a professional meteorologist or an accredited weather research agency otherwise, especially if serious decisions must be made in the event of a potentially life-threatening tropical storm or hurricane.

AlphaToOmega
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1448
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2021 10:51 am
Location: Somewhere in Massachusetts

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#16 Postby AlphaToOmega » Sat Aug 07, 2021 2:57 pm

The analysis from the GFS, ECMWF, and CMC models all show a closed low. How much more convection is needed for a tropical cyclone?
0 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4928
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#17 Postby Nimbus » Sat Aug 07, 2021 2:58 pm

Coriolis effect was stronger for the eastern wave which I assume is 93L but there is still a wave further west that could spin up near the islands if the current area with high vorticity dries out.
0 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8057
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#18 Postby aspen » Sat Aug 07, 2021 3:14 pm

The first SHIPS forecast is quite aggressive, bringing this to 70-75 kt by 120hr. Seems like the environment is solidly favorable, with low to moderate shear, SSTs around 28C coming up, and acceptable levels of atmospheric moisture. Already having a good spin means it’s in a far better starting point than 92L, and it just needs to generate some consistent convection. Let’s see if Dmax is enough to do the trick.
3 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
Category5Kaiju
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3357
Age: 22
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2020 12:45 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#19 Postby Category5Kaiju » Sat Aug 07, 2021 3:15 pm

AlphaToOmega wrote:The analysis from the GFS, ECMWF, and CMC models all show a closed low. How much more convection is needed for a tropical cyclone?


Deep convection and for it to sustain itself for a decent period of time is generally what hurricane trackers look at before determining whether a system is indeed a TC or if it is still a wave or PTC. Now exactly what given criteria must be met, that's something I leave up to the pros who would understand these phenomena much better than I do. I will say that ASCAT is also a pretty reliable and efficient tool that all of us can easily follow and understand
0 likes   
Unless explicitly stated, all information covered in my posts is based on my opinions and observations. Please refer to a professional meteorologist or an accredited weather research agency otherwise, especially if serious decisions must be made in the event of a potentially life-threatening tropical storm or hurricane.

psyclone
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4487
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:04 pm
Location: palm harbor fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#20 Postby psyclone » Sat Aug 07, 2021 4:04 pm

Very impressive vorticity with this one. that is a large circulation. Just lacking deep convection for now but this looks like a good bet for an eventual number and name.
0 likes   


Return to “2021”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 71 guests