Iceresistance wrote:zzzh wrote:Looks like it just got named Karl. lol
It's still Invest 93L until the NHC puts out Advisory #1 for either TD 14 or TS Karl.
ATCF has it as Karl, so it's basically certain an advisory is coming
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Iceresistance wrote:zzzh wrote:Looks like it just got named Karl. lol
It's still Invest 93L until the NHC puts out Advisory #1 for either TD 14 or TS Karl.
NotSparta wrote:Iceresistance wrote:zzzh wrote:Looks like it just got named Karl. lol
It's still Invest 93L until the NHC puts out Advisory #1 for either TD 14 or TS Karl.
ATCF has it as Karl, so it's basically certain an advisory is coming
wxman57 wrote:Latest reports from the plane are less convincing that we have a TS in the BoC. Squalls may be producing TS winds to the north, but the well-defined LLC is questionable.
WiscoWx02 wrote:wxman57 wrote:Latest reports from the plane are less convincing that we have a TS in the BoC. Squalls may be producing TS winds to the north, but the well-defined LLC is questionable.
That honestly doesn't look like enough to be classified IMO, not defined enough, doubt they pull the trigger on it yet if at all.
Aric Dunn wrote:WiscoWx02 wrote:wxman57 wrote:Latest reports from the plane are less convincing that we have a TS in the BoC. Squalls may be producing TS winds to the north, but the well-defined LLC is questionable.
That honestly doesn't look like enough to be classified IMO, not defined enough, doubt they pull the trigger on it yet if at all.
it is more than enough and it is KArl.
wxman57 wrote:NotSparta wrote:Iceresistance wrote:
It's still Invest 93L until the NHC puts out Advisory #1 for either TD 14 or TS Karl.
ATCF has it as Karl, so it's basically certain an advisory is coming
What is the URL to that file?
Aric Dunn wrote:WiscoWx02 wrote:wxman57 wrote:Latest reports from the plane are less convincing that we have a TS in the BoC. Squalls may be producing TS winds to the north, but the well-defined LLC is questionable.
That honestly doesn't look like enough to be classified IMO, not defined enough, doubt they pull the trigger on it yet if at all.
it is more than enough and it is KArl.
tolakram wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:WiscoWx02 wrote:
That honestly doesn't look like enough to be classified IMO, not defined enough, doubt they pull the trigger on it yet if at all.
it is more than enough and it is KArl.
Where are you seeing the official name change? You sound pretty argumentative, people have different opinions and that's ok.
Aric Dunn wrote:tolakram wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:
it is more than enough and it is KArl.
Where are you seeing the official name change? You sound pretty argumentative, people have different opinions and that's ok.
https://www.fnmoc.navy.mil/tcweb/cgi-bi ... 99W.INVEST,
Aric Dunn wrote:tolakram wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:
it is more than enough and it is KArl.
Where are you seeing the official name change? You sound pretty argumentative, people have different opinions and that's ok.
https://www.fnmoc.navy.mil/tcweb/cgi-bi ... 99W.INVEST,
zzzh wrote:wxman57 wrote:NotSparta wrote:
ATCF has it as Karl, so it's basically certain an advisory is coming
What is the URL to that file?
FNMOC
https://www.fnmoc.navy.mil/tcweb/cgi-bin/tc_home.cgi
tolakram wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:WiscoWx02 wrote:
That honestly doesn't look like enough to be classified IMO, not defined enough, doubt they pull the trigger on it yet if at all.
it is more than enough and it is KArl.
Where are you seeing the official name change? You sound pretty argumentative, people have different opinions and that's ok.
tropicwatch wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:tolakram wrote:
Where are you seeing the official name change? You sound pretty argumentative, people have different opinions and that's ok.
https://www.fnmoc.navy.mil/tcweb/cgi-bi ... 99W.INVEST,
I like the Navy but they don't get a say in this
tolakram wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:tolakram wrote:
Where are you seeing the official name change? You sound pretty argumentative, people have different opinions and that's ok.
https://www.fnmoc.navy.mil/tcweb/cgi-bi ... 99W.INVEST,
That has been wrong twice this year so far, I assume it's automated.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests