underthwx wrote:Iceresistance wrote:aspen wrote:Emerging off of Cuba with an excellent structure.
https://i.imgur.com/SQI6uRc.jpg
I'm now very concerned about RI until landfall. I thought it was highly unlikely, but now that Ian's track has shifted further east and it didn't take much of a hit from its Cuba landfall, it has become a very real possibility. It might not get nearly as much shear with this track as it would've if it went north of Tampa towards the panhandle. Also, SSTs/MPI are nuclear in Ian's path. Let's hope that shear kicks in sooner than later.
https://i.imgur.com/zJ4AjEr.png
https://i.imgur.com/4TrraX2.png
This unfortunately does not appear to be the case because the wind shear appears to be favorable directionally.
Unless I'm mistaken, Wxman57 discussed the shear that will affect Ian, and weaken it somewhat upon its approach to land...this is an excerpt from the 5am NHC discussion..."By 24
to 36 hours, increasing southwesterly vertical wind shear and drier
mid-level air are likely to result in some gradual weakening." By favorable wind shear, do you mean favorable because it will weaken Ian somewhat?....Just to be clear Ice, thanks!
The direction of the wind shear is currently favorable for more intensification because the storm is moving in the same direction as the shear, but the direction will eventually change in the next 48-72 hours to unfavorable direction combined with dry air behind this cold front.