MarioProtVI wrote:Now that Ian has made landfall the impacts are going to be catastrophic since this is literally Charley supersized (landfall location, strength and pressure). I think there’s a strong chance we see a post season upgrade in the vein of Michael since recon, radar and satellite data all supported a C5 peak of 140 kt around 12-13z this morning. It’s weakened since then but still.
Also if it does happen it’ll be extremely cursed for the strongest storm this season since Fiona was 932 mb but only was 115 kt. 130/932 vs 160/937 would be beyond cursed lol. Unless the Caribbean spits out something even stronger then both of them in October which is not impossible (particularly the second have of the month where conditions look better)
I’d put Ian’s peak at 140 kt and 935 mbar earlier this morning. 140 kt is a blend of those 160 kt FL winds (90% conversion yields ~145 kt) and a couple of valid borderline Cat 4/5 SFMR readings from both planes. The extrapolated pressure from both planes was a little lower than the eye drops, so maybe the actual pressure did get a little below the operational 937 mbar. Landfall intensity looks good. It clearly wasn’t a Cat 5…which still doesn’t make things any better for the landfall zone.