ATL: EARL - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Iceresistance
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8910
Age: 20
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2020 9:45 am
Location: Tecumseh, OK/Norman, OK

Re: ATL: EARL - Hurricane - Discussion

#821 Postby Iceresistance » Thu Sep 08, 2022 10:26 am

0 likes   
Bill 2015 & Beta 2020

Winter 2020-2021 :cold:

All observations are in Tecumseh, OK unless otherwise noted.

Winter posts are focused mainly for Oklahoma & Texas.

Take any of my forecasts with a grain of salt, refer to the NWS, SPC, and NHC for official information

Never say Never with weather! Because ANYTHING is possible!

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5528
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: ATL: EARL - Hurricane - Discussion

#822 Postby cheezyWXguy » Thu Sep 08, 2022 10:27 am

wxman57 wrote:As I suspected, NHC went with 90 kts. They never like to indicate weakening prior to landfall or a close-approach, no matter what recon says.

If the next plane in fails to find winds that justify 90kt, I’ll side with you, but for now it looks to me like they happened to cross during an interval where the strongest quadrant was dry slotted. If it was just a short period where winds were down, it doesn’t bug me that they retained 90kt.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22480
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: EARL - Hurricane - Discussion

#823 Postby wxman57 » Thu Sep 08, 2022 10:42 am

cheezyWXguy wrote:
wxman57 wrote:As I suspected, NHC went with 90 kts. They never like to indicate weakening prior to landfall or a close-approach, no matter what recon says.

If the next plane in fails to find winds that justify 90kt, I’ll side with you, but for now it looks to me like they happened to cross during an interval where the strongest quadrant was dry slotted. If it was just a short period where winds were down, it doesn’t bug me that they retained 90kt.


Yeah, I agree, the plane happened to make all of its passes when there were no 90 kt winds anywhere to be found, even at flight level. I also agree that winds should be higher later when the eye contracts. I've been watching NHC forecasts for 40+ years. They do not ever like to indicate weakening for a storm making landfall or approaching land. Their job is to keep the public safe. If they say "Earl's weakening", then the public may not pay as much attention.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22480
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: EARL - Hurricane - Discussion

#824 Postby wxman57 » Thu Sep 08, 2022 10:53 am

Speaking of the next recon, it's looking like the plane had an issue and is returning to St. Croix.
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5528
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: ATL: EARL - Hurricane - Discussion

#825 Postby cheezyWXguy » Thu Sep 08, 2022 11:18 am

wxman57 wrote:
cheezyWXguy wrote:
wxman57 wrote:As I suspected, NHC went with 90 kts. They never like to indicate weakening prior to landfall or a close-approach, no matter what recon says.

If the next plane in fails to find winds that justify 90kt, I’ll side with you, but for now it looks to me like they happened to cross during an interval where the strongest quadrant was dry slotted. If it was just a short period where winds were down, it doesn’t bug me that they retained 90kt.


Yeah, I agree, the plane happened to make all of its passes when there were no 90 kt winds anywhere to be found, even at flight level. I also agree that winds should be higher later when the eye contracts. I've been watching NHC forecasts for 40+ years. They do not ever like to indicate weakening for a storm making landfall or approaching land. Their job is to keep the public safe. If they say "Earl's weakening", then the public may not pay as much attention.

Can’t tell if that first line sarcasm or not, but they found 93kt FL winds in the last mission. Correct me if I’m wrong, but if a hurricane’s max winds were 90kt, wouldn’t they be restricted to a small portion of the strongest quadrant and nowhere else? If I’m looking at the map right, they only made one pass through the east quad where those winds would be expected to be found.
1 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8056
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: EARL - Hurricane - Discussion

#826 Postby aspen » Thu Sep 08, 2022 11:23 am

wxman57 wrote:Speaking of the next recon, it's looking like the plane had an issue and is returning to St. Croix.

Another one is on the pad now. This recon delay could give Earl enough time to work out the dry air, and maybe this flight will support Cat 2 intensity.
0 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139025
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: EARL - Hurricane - Discussion

#827 Postby cycloneye » Thu Sep 08, 2022 12:06 pm

Plane is flying now.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

Hurricane Mike
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 562
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2018 7:44 am

Re: ATL: EARL - Hurricane - Discussion

#828 Postby Hurricane Mike » Thu Sep 08, 2022 12:14 pm

New video update on Hurricane Earl
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hG8LHYWK2Aw
0 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8056
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: EARL - Hurricane - Discussion

#829 Postby aspen » Thu Sep 08, 2022 12:17 pm

The dry slot is still very evident on satellite imagery. You’d think Earl’s dry air problems would be done now that shear has dropped to below 10 kt.
1 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
Iceresistance
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8910
Age: 20
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2020 9:45 am
Location: Tecumseh, OK/Norman, OK

Re: ATL: EARL - Hurricane - Discussion

#830 Postby Iceresistance » Thu Sep 08, 2022 12:33 pm

Starting to do the east turn as the NHC expected

Image
https://s4.gifyu.com/images/94999267.gif
0 likes   
Bill 2015 & Beta 2020

Winter 2020-2021 :cold:

All observations are in Tecumseh, OK unless otherwise noted.

Winter posts are focused mainly for Oklahoma & Texas.

Take any of my forecasts with a grain of salt, refer to the NWS, SPC, and NHC for official information

Never say Never with weather! Because ANYTHING is possible!

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22480
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: EARL - Hurricane - Discussion

#831 Postby wxman57 » Thu Sep 08, 2022 12:46 pm

cheezyWXguy wrote:
wxman57 wrote:
cheezyWXguy wrote:If the next plane in fails to find winds that justify 90kt, I’ll side with you, but for now it looks to me like they happened to cross during an interval where the strongest quadrant was dry slotted. If it was just a short period where winds were down, it doesn’t bug me that they retained 90kt.


Yeah, I agree, the plane happened to make all of its passes when there were no 90 kt winds anywhere to be found, even at flight level. I also agree that winds should be higher later when the eye contracts. I've been watching NHC forecasts for 40+ years. They do not ever like to indicate weakening for a storm making landfall or approaching land. Their job is to keep the public safe. If they say "Earl's weakening", then the public may not pay as much attention.

Can’t tell if that first line sarcasm or not, but they found 93kt FL winds in the last mission. Correct me if I’m wrong, but if a hurricane’s max winds were 90kt, wouldn’t they be restricted to a small portion of the strongest quadrant and nowhere else? If I’m looking at the map right, they only made one pass through the east quad where those winds would be expected to be found.


First line was semi-sarcastic. Sometimes a storms max winds are located over only a few square miles and then they may only be transient, rotating around the storm. It's very difficult to sample hundreds of square miles using a single recon plane. However, if Earl was producing sustained surface winds of 90 kts, the plane should have found higher winds at flight level. It's only very rarely that a plane might hit the max sustained wind area. And then, that area is rotating around the storm and fluctuating in intensity.
1 likes   

User avatar
ElectricStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4523
Age: 23
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK

Re: ATL: EARL - Hurricane - Discussion

#832 Postby ElectricStorm » Thu Sep 08, 2022 1:06 pm

I'm thinking recon finds similar winds/pressure to the previous mission, although it does look like Earl is trying to rebuild the eyewall. Still needs deeper convection on the east side, and it needs to finish mixing out the dry air for it to really take off.

I'm a bit skeptical this reaches Cat 4 but it would be neat to see one that far north. I think slow strengthening to a 100-105kt peak might be a bit more likely, but we'll see.
1 likes   
I am in no way a professional. Take what I say with a grain of salt as I could be totally wrong. Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.

Boomer Sooner!

User avatar
kevin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1767
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:35 am

Re: ATL: EARL - Hurricane - Discussion

#833 Postby kevin » Thu Sep 08, 2022 1:12 pm

The eyewall (of a smaller eye) now fully connects again on IR, even though there's still a dry slot it has to get rid of. Will probably do so soon, but I agree that I doubt whether it'll happen fast enough for this recon plane to find significantly stronger winds. It does look beautiful on VIS though imo, something about this ragged look (kinda reminiscent of Epilson 2020) is really nice to look at.

3 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8056
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: EARL - Hurricane - Discussion

#834 Postby aspen » Thu Sep 08, 2022 1:46 pm

Maybe this dry air intrusion has resulted in the eye drastically shrinking. It doesn’t seem like Earl’s eye is going to be as big anymore once it fully clears out, and one of the bands that might’ve belonged to the old eyewall is just getting further and further from the core. Recon is getting close to its first center pass and should give us some clear answers on how the core has evolved.
0 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22480
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: EARL - Hurricane - Discussion

#835 Postby wxman57 » Thu Sep 08, 2022 2:08 pm

Might be a small area of hurricane-force wind in the SW quadrant (60-65 kts), according to recon.
0 likes   

User avatar
Iceresistance
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8910
Age: 20
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2020 9:45 am
Location: Tecumseh, OK/Norman, OK

Re: ATL: EARL - Hurricane - Discussion

#836 Postby Iceresistance » Thu Sep 08, 2022 2:11 pm

Earl is still deepening, 960.8 MB extrapolated at the lowest.
0 likes   
Bill 2015 & Beta 2020

Winter 2020-2021 :cold:

All observations are in Tecumseh, OK unless otherwise noted.

Winter posts are focused mainly for Oklahoma & Texas.

Take any of my forecasts with a grain of salt, refer to the NWS, SPC, and NHC for official information

Never say Never with weather! Because ANYTHING is possible!

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5594
Age: 40
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: EARL - Hurricane - Discussion

#837 Postby Hammy » Thu Sep 08, 2022 2:14 pm

Looking less likely this reaches major hurricane, it really only has about 24h to do so before extratropical transition process begins. Pressure drop is being countered by the expanding wind field
4 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
skyline385
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2444
Age: 33
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:15 pm
Location: Palm Beach County FL

Re: ATL: EARL - Hurricane - Discussion

#838 Postby skyline385 » Thu Sep 08, 2022 2:17 pm

With a pressure gradient looking like this, i doubt it gets to a major anytime soon

Image


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
3 likes   

User avatar
WiscoWx02
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 340
Age: 21
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2021 8:09 pm
Location: Minnesota

Re: ATL: EARL - Hurricane - Discussion

#839 Postby WiscoWx02 » Thu Sep 08, 2022 2:27 pm

skyline385 wrote:With a pressure gradient looking like this, i doubt it gets to a major anytime soon

https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20220908/a9a9251ca9fe10539869480a29d31c76.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



I agree…I’m not expecting Earl to reach category 3 intensity much less category 4…the structure is too ragged and the wind field is too big.
2 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22480
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: EARL - Hurricane - Discussion

#840 Postby wxman57 » Thu Sep 08, 2022 2:29 pm

skyline385 wrote:With a pressure gradient looking like this, i doubt it gets to a major anytime soon

https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20220908/a9a9251ca9fe10539869480a29d31c76.jpg


Right, it's all about the pressure gradient, not the pressure itself. Looks like Earl just has a weak pressure gradient. Plane found a 90kt FL wind in the NE eyewall, but surface SFMR only 65 kts. As Earl moves over cooler water, that FL wind will not make it down to the surface as well.
1 likes   


Return to “2022”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests