ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23689
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#21 Postby gatorcane » Sun Sep 08, 2024 11:06 am

12Z GFS with no development again, two runs in a row.
0 likes   

User avatar
tiger_deF
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 468
Age: 24
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2016 11:47 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#22 Postby tiger_deF » Sun Sep 08, 2024 11:07 am

Best looking wave in the MDR since quite a while. Even for Debby and Ernesto their waves were in rough shape. Lots of convection, could be a big ACE generator
2 likes   

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3168
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#23 Postby Teban54 » Sun Sep 08, 2024 11:24 am

This does look like something trying to become a TC, regardless of what models are showing.

Image

Image
Last edited by Teban54 on Sun Sep 08, 2024 11:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
7 likes   

User avatar
wzrgirl1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1323
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 6:44 am
Location: Pembroke Pines, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#24 Postby wzrgirl1 » Sun Sep 08, 2024 11:28 am

Well it's at 60% in the long term so I guess the NHC sees something.
0 likes   

PDKlikatino
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 20
Age: 18
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2024 5:16 pm
Location: Tampa, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#25 Postby PDKlikatino » Sun Sep 08, 2024 1:08 pm

Yikes, this little guy popped up out of nowhere! NHC has it at 60% in the short term and 70% in the next five days now. I wonder what changed from being a low chance just a couple days ago?
4 likes   
My posts are not official forecasts, just guesses. For accurate information, visit the NHC or NWS websites instead.

Sciencerocks
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8903
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#26 Postby Sciencerocks » Sun Sep 08, 2024 2:08 pm

Image

Looks like a depression if not a storm! Almost better then 91L but I'd say both are currently deserving.
3 likes   

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3168
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#27 Postby Teban54 » Sun Sep 08, 2024 2:20 pm

I wasn't expecting a cherry update honestly. NHC is clearly going with real-time trends rather than model hugging; big props if this does end up verifying.

Convection has waned a bit in recent frames, but it's Dmin.
3 likes   

Cachondo23
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed May 25, 2022 5:56 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#28 Postby Cachondo23 » Sun Sep 08, 2024 2:57 pm

cycloneye wrote:
AL, 92, 2024090812, , BEST, 0, 132N, 424W, 25, 1010, LO


https://i.imgur.com/3CFcDSD.png

Very weird track
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10140
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#29 Postby Blown Away » Sun Sep 08, 2024 5:28 pm

Are the days a W moving TW and/or Hurricane making it past 70W over???
1 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05... EYE COMING MY WAY IN 2024…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

User avatar
boca
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6365
Age: 60
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 8:49 am
Location: Boca Raton,FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#30 Postby boca » Sun Sep 08, 2024 5:34 pm

Blown Away wrote:Are the days a W moving TW and/or Hurricane making it past 70W over???


That’s because the Bermuda high has been nonexistent this season past Beryl
0 likes   

User avatar
Ubuntwo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1401
Age: 31
Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2017 10:41 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#31 Postby Ubuntwo » Sun Sep 08, 2024 6:37 pm

boca wrote:
Blown Away wrote:Are the days a W moving TW and/or Hurricane making it past 70W over???


That’s because the Bermuda high has been nonexistent this season past Beryl

That’s not entirely true as pre-91L had a very anomalously strong Bermuda high overhead as it was crossing the Caribbean. Unlikely to hold for this system, but that’s climatology as fewer than 10% of CV systems successfully make the trek and that rate is even lower this time of year.
1 likes   
Kendall -> SLO -> PBC

Memorable Storms: Katrina (for its Florida landfall...) Wilma Matthew Irma

User avatar
abajan
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4229
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 5:10 am
Location: Barbados

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#32 Postby abajan » Sun Sep 08, 2024 6:43 pm

8 PM:

Central Tropical Atlantic (AL92):
Showers and thunderstorms associated with an area of low pressure
over the central tropical Atlantic have changed little in
organization since earlier today. Environmental conditions appear
conducive for additional development during the next couple of days,
and a tropical depression is likely to form during that time while
the system meanders over the central tropical Atlantic. By the
middle of the week, the system should begin moving more westward at
around 10 mph.
* Formation chance through 48 hours...medium...60 percent.
* Formation chance through 7 days...high...70 percent.
1 likes   

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3168
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#33 Postby Teban54 » Mon Sep 09, 2024 2:00 am

Remains at 60/70, even though the vigorous convection earlier has waned and been replaced by two towers (albeit a pretty big one)
1. Central Tropical Atlantic (AL92):
An area of low pressure is producing disorganized showers and
thunderstorms over the central tropical Atlantic. Environmental
conditions appear generally conducive for development during the
next few days, and a tropical depression is expected to form while
the system meanders over the central tropical Atlantic. By the
middle of the week, the system should begin move
westward-northwestward at around 10 mph.
* Formation chance through 48 hours...medium...60 percent.
* Formation chance through 7 days...high...70 percent.
0 likes   

WeatherBoy2000
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 280
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2023 9:29 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#34 Postby WeatherBoy2000 » Mon Sep 09, 2024 7:08 am

It's now back down to an orange, not looking so healthy today.
0 likes   

User avatar
Category5Kaiju
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4051
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2020 12:45 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#35 Postby Category5Kaiju » Mon Sep 09, 2024 7:09 am

WeatherBoy2000 wrote:It's now back down to an orange, not looking so healthy today.


Looks like the area behind it will be the victor after all. Gotta give credit to the models (like the Euro) that weren't very optimistic about this particular disturbance.
1 likes   
Unless explicitly stated, all info in my posts is based on my own opinions and observations. Tropical storms and hurricanes can be extremely dangerous. Do not think you can beat Mother Nature. Refer to an accredited weather research agency or meteorologist if you need to make serious decisions regarding an approaching storm.

ChrisH-UK
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 611
Joined: Sat May 29, 2021 8:22 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#36 Postby ChrisH-UK » Mon Sep 09, 2024 8:24 am

The problem is with 92L is that it is a 3 or even 4 bodied problem. The models have it emerging for these waves and another wave coming off the coast of Africa it's this that is causing a problem with the models and the on off nature of them, there figuring out which one has the dominance to form in to a storm or two.

Image
1 likes   

User avatar
Ubuntwo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1401
Age: 31
Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2017 10:41 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#37 Postby Ubuntwo » Mon Sep 09, 2024 8:27 am

NHC is saying maybe a depression or weak storm in the short term, which there is still model support for.
0 likes   
Kendall -> SLO -> PBC

Memorable Storms: Katrina (for its Florida landfall...) Wilma Matthew Irma

User avatar
Blinhart
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2079
Age: 48
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Crowley, La.

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#38 Postby Blinhart » Mon Sep 09, 2024 9:43 am

ChrisH-UK wrote:The problem is with 92L is that it is a 3 or even 4 bodied problem. The models have it emerging for these waves and another wave coming off the coast of Africa it's this that is causing a problem with the models and the on off nature of them, there figuring out which one has the dominance to form in to a storm or two.

[url]https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img924/1919/TYwQDa.gif [/url]



I could see 2 or 3 different systems to come out of this mess.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5407
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#39 Postby chaser1 » Mon Sep 09, 2024 9:55 am

Blinhart wrote:
ChrisH-UK wrote:The problem is with 92L is that it is a 3 or even 4 bodied problem. The models have it emerging for these waves and another wave coming off the coast of Africa it's this that is causing a problem with the models and the on off nature of them, there figuring out which one has the dominance to form in to a storm or two.

[url]https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img924/1919/TYwQDa.gif [/url]



I could see 2 or 3 different systems to come out of this mess.


Perhaps. In any other year I'd say probable. In fact, while all the chatter is over 92L and the wave further east.... I'm more focused on the ITCZ disturbance at 12N and 52W! I see some level of rotation to it right now.
1 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3168
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#40 Postby Teban54 » Mon Sep 09, 2024 11:50 am

ASCAT pass in the morning shows an elongated circulation (which may have been there earlier, I didn't check), and that contributed to 92L looking decent on visible satellite. However, the main problem right now is that 92L has failed to sustain convection. Perhaps because too many competing vorts are around?

Image

Image
1 likes   


Return to “2024”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests