NATL: MELISSA - Aftermath - Discussion: Josh Morgerman video of Melissa is up

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Jr0d
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1471
Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2019 10:52 am
Location: Cayo Hueso

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2941 Postby Jr0d » Thu Oct 30, 2025 3:24 pm

Its been a long week and still Melissa has yet to hit Bermuda as her finale.

I was in shock when I saw the pressure and winds Tuesday. Maybe in the future with atorms like this we can have a separate thread dedicated to documenting the storm destruction and recovery efforts.

I have seen evidence of trees being debarked already with relatively limited pictures from "ground zero". I imagine this will be widespread. In the past with extreme hurricanes this only happens over a small area. Andrew and Michael are storms where this was documented but over a relatively small area.
4 likes   

Nuno
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 621
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2019 8:35 am
Location: Coral Gables, FL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2942 Postby Nuno » Thu Oct 30, 2025 5:21 pm

tolakram wrote:
Kazmit wrote:Definitely a MH again- don't know why the NHC didn't upgrade it at 8am.


Email them and ask.


Who would be best to reach out and ask? 8-)
0 likes   
Andrew (1992), Irene (1999), Frances (2004), Katrina (2005), Wilma (2005), Fay (2008), Irma (2017), Eta (2020), Ian (2022)

User avatar
Kazmit
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2258
Age: 22
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2016 8:49 am
Location: Bermuda

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2943 Postby Kazmit » Thu Oct 30, 2025 5:24 pm

A shame the Bermuda radar is down.
2 likes   
Igor 2010, Sandy 2012, Fay 2014, Gonzalo 2014, Joaquin 2015, Nicole 2016, Humberto 2019, Imelda 2025

I am only a tropical weather enthusiast. My predictions are not official and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Nuno
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 621
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2019 8:35 am
Location: Coral Gables, FL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2944 Postby Nuno » Thu Oct 30, 2025 5:30 pm

Kazmit wrote:A shame the Bermuda radar is down.


Really unfortunate timing.
0 likes   
Andrew (1992), Irene (1999), Frances (2004), Katrina (2005), Wilma (2005), Fay (2008), Irma (2017), Eta (2020), Ian (2022)

MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 502
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2020 1:43 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2945 Postby MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS » Thu Oct 30, 2025 5:39 pm

Nuno wrote:
Kazmit wrote:A shame the Bermuda radar is down.


Really unfortunate timing.


Been about a year.
1 likes   
Emily '87, Felix '95, Gert '99, Fabian '03, Humberto '19, Paulette '20, Teddy '20, Fiona '22, Lee '23, Ernesto '24, Humberto/Imelda '25

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20167
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2946 Postby tolakram » Thu Oct 30, 2025 6:12 pm

Nuno wrote:
tolakram wrote:
Kazmit wrote:Definitely a MH again- don't know why the NHC didn't upgrade it at 8am.


Email them and ask.


Who would be best to reach out and ask? 8-)


https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/contact.shtml
2 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
storm_in_a_teacup
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 493
Age: 33
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2017 5:01 pm
Location: Huntsville, Alabama (originally from Houston)
Contact:

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2947 Postby storm_in_a_teacup » Thu Oct 30, 2025 6:40 pm

Teban54 wrote:Ironically, Melissa's appearance started degrading immediately after the advisory.

https://i.imgur.com/cYOJnxz.gif


Wow she's just like, freaking dying
1 likes   
I know I can't straddle the atmosphere...just a tiny storm in your teacup, girl.

Sciencerocks
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10180
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2948 Postby Sciencerocks » Thu Oct 30, 2025 7:45 pm

Image
1 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34308
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2949 Postby CrazyC83 » Thu Oct 30, 2025 8:18 pm

My guess is there was a secondary peak around 1200Z, and since then it has been weakening pretty quickly. Probably becomes ET sometime tomorrow.
5 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 148593
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2950 Postby cycloneye » Thu Oct 30, 2025 8:43 pm

Very interesting. CrazyC83, what do you think about this?

 https://x.com/AndyHazelton/status/1984013949323329983

0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 502
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2020 1:43 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2951 Postby MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS » Thu Oct 30, 2025 9:18 pm

Getting windy. Wish the radar was working.
0 likes   
Emily '87, Felix '95, Gert '99, Fabian '03, Humberto '19, Paulette '20, Teddy '20, Fiona '22, Lee '23, Ernesto '24, Humberto/Imelda '25

MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 502
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2020 1:43 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2952 Postby MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS » Thu Oct 30, 2025 9:22 pm

Sustained winds of about 36 knots: https://www.weather.bm/tools/graphics.a ... SITE&user=

(NMB site is at elevation, maybe 20-30 meters, but the airport ones are more like 6-8 meters)
0 likes   
Emily '87, Felix '95, Gert '99, Fabian '03, Humberto '19, Paulette '20, Teddy '20, Fiona '22, Lee '23, Ernesto '24, Humberto/Imelda '25

MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 502
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2020 1:43 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2953 Postby MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS » Thu Oct 30, 2025 9:24 pm

This page has complete obs (wind, pressure, etc) from the airport over the last 24 hours. Pressure falling quickly now.

https://www.weather.bm/tools/graphics.a ... 24HR&user=
0 likes   
Emily '87, Felix '95, Gert '99, Fabian '03, Humberto '19, Paulette '20, Teddy '20, Fiona '22, Lee '23, Ernesto '24, Humberto/Imelda '25

Hurricane Mike
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 675
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2018 7:44 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2954 Postby Hurricane Mike » Thu Oct 30, 2025 10:03 pm

1 likes   

HurricaneRyan
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 842
Age: 31
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2010 3:05 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2955 Postby HurricaneRyan » Thu Oct 30, 2025 10:43 pm

Looks like Melissa is ready to make her exit and join her Mom and grandma in retirement.
10 likes   
Kay '22 Hilary '23

ncforecaster89
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 263
Age: 55
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2018 12:32 pm
Contact:

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2956 Postby ncforecaster89 » Fri Oct 31, 2025 3:59 am

CrazyC83 wrote:This is UNOFFICIAL, but here is how - up to now - I would update the BT for Melissa, adding the post-Jamaica track. A full explanation will come after becoming ET. That said, two landfalls in the Bahamas have been added on Long Island and San Salvador Island.

AL132025, MELISSA, xx,
20251020, 1200, , LO, 13.5N, 66.5W, 30, 1008,
20251020, 1800, , LO, 13.7N, 67.7W, 35, 1006,
20251021, 0000, , LO, 13.9N, 68.9W, 35, 1005,
20251021, 0600, , LO, 14.1N, 70.1W, 40, 1004,
20251021, 1200, , LO, 14.1N, 71.3W, 40, 1003,
20251021, 1800, , LO, 14.1N, 72.5W, 40, 1002,
20251022, 0000, , TS, 14.1N, 73.2W, 45, 1002,
20251022, 0600, , TS, 14.2N, 73.4W, 45, 1001,
20251022, 1200, , TS, 14.3N, 73.6W, 45, 1000,
20251022, 1800, , TS, 14.4N, 73.9W, 40, 1002,
20251023, 0000, , TS, 14.6N, 74.3W, 40, 1004,
20251023, 0600, , TS, 14.8N, 74.6W, 35, 1005,
20251023, 1200, , TS, 15.2N, 75.0W, 35, 1005,
20251023, 1800, , TS, 15.5N, 75.3W, 40, 1002,
20251024, 0000, , TS, 15.7N, 75.6W, 40, 1001,
20251024, 0600, , TS, 16.0N, 75.3W, 40, 1001,
20251024, 1200, , TS, 15.8N, 74.9W, 45, 1000,
20251024, 1800, , TS, 15.8N, 74.5W, 50, 996,
20251025, 0000, , TS, 16.1N, 74.7W, 55, 993,
20251025, 0600, , TS, 16.3N, 74.9W, 60, 986,
20251025, 1200, , HU, 16.4N, 75.1W, 65, 983,
20251025, 1800, , HU, 16.5N, 75.3W, 70, 977,
20251026, 0000, , HU, 16.4N, 75.7W, 85, 970,
20251026, 0600, , HU, 16.3N, 76.0W, 100, 957,
20251026, 1200, , HU, 16.4N, 76.4W, 110, 952,
20251026, 1800, , HU, 16.4N, 76.9W, 120, 944,
20251027, 0000, , HU, 16.4N, 77.3W, 130, 932,
20251027, 0600, , HU, 16.3N, 77.7W, 135, 922,
20251027, 1200, , HU, 16.4N, 78.0W, 145, 913,
20251027, 1800, , HU, 16.4N, 78.3W, 155, 906,
20251028, 0000, , HU, 16.5N, 78.6W, 155, 905,
20251028, 0600, , HU, 16.9N, 78.4W, 155, 900,
20251028, 1200, , HU, 17.5N, 78.1W, 165, 894,
20251028, 1400, I, HU, 17.7N, 78.0W, 170, 892,
20251028, 1700, L, HU, 18.1N, 78.0W, 160, 897,
20251028, 1800, , HU, 18.2N, 77.9W, 140, 910,
20251028, 2200, R, HU, 18.7N, 77.4W, 95, 955,
20251029, 0000, , HU, 18.9N, 77.2W, 100, 954,
20251029, 0600, , HU, 19.8N, 76.3W, 105, 951,
20251029, 0715, L, HU, 20.0N, 76.1W, 105, 950,
20251029, 1200, , HU, 20.9N, 75.8W, 75, 972,
20251029, 1800, , HU, 22.1N, 75.3W, 80, 974,
20251029, 2130, L, HU, 22.5N, 75.0W, 85, 971,
20251030, 0000, , HU, 23.5N, 74.8W, 90, 969,
20251030, 0200, L, HU, 24.0N, 74.5W, 90, 967,


Hi Crazy, I’m in complete agreement that there was likely a 10 kt differential between its peak around 1330-1400z and landfall at 1700z. The only difference is that I’d set the aforementioned peak intensity at 165 kt/892 mb and landfall intensity at 155 kt/899 mb.

The meteorological reasoning:

Reconnaissance aircraft released a dropsonde that recorded a lowest central pressure of 892 mb at 1302z. The next (and last) pass through the eye found that the pressure was up 2 mb to 894 mb, but measured the peak 700 mb FLW of 172 kt at 1346z. These in-situ observations coincided with Melissa’s most impressive satellite presentation and this was reflected on the various satellite intensity estimates. The CIMSS-ADT analyzed the peak at 1410z, for one such example.

From that point, there was a significant and obvious warming of cloud tops within the CDO…which was most pronounced in the eyewall convection…that occurred during those remaining 3 hours from Melissa’s peak through landfall of the center at 1700z. Furthermore, the eye was certainly filling and losing definition/symmetry and was already beginning to close prior to that time. As we’ve seen in numerous cases, these high-end category five hurricanes typically weaken much more quickly than one that has a larger starting RMW. The CIMSS-ADT analyzed a 7 mb filling from 1400z to landfall and it’s conceivable it may have risen a little further than that.

Assessing the Intensity:

The 172 kt FLWs equate to 155 kt at the surface using the standard 90% conversion factor.

The 188 kt WL150 wind obs equate to 156 kt after applying the typical 83% conversion rate.

These data show, as would be expected, that there was a very efficient mixing rate of FLWs to the surface. As such, and given the possibility that there may have been stronger winds in the NE portion of the eyewall, I’d increase the MSW peak intensity from the current operational estimate of 160 kt to 165 kt. One important thing to note, we’re assuming RECON would’ve potentially measured higher FLWs in the unsampled NE quadrant but there’s no way to know if that would’ve been true. In many prior case, where an intensifying high-end hurricane was moving in a general NE’erly direction, the maximum wind speeds were actually located in the SE quadrant of the eyewall. Even so, and taking all the available data into consideration, I feel 165 kt/892 mb is the most accurate estimation of this historic hurricane’s extraordinary peak strength.

Landfall:

Unfortunately, and understandably, there was no additional direct sampling of Melissa’s eye or eyewall (by RECON) after 1350z for obvious safety reasons. Consequently, we’re left with a far more subjective interpretation of how much weakening may have transpired between 1400z and 1700z.

As noted above, CIMSS-ADT analyzed a 7 mb rise in the central pressure over that span. However, If the aforementioned 2 mb differential in pressure between the last two RECON observations (45 minutes apart) is more accurate, from 1302z onwards, that’d equate to about 901 mb at landfall. And, it’s also possible that the filling rate may have increased given the notable satellite degradation from its peak.

Taking all the aforementioned into account, I’d set the landfall intensity at a somewhat uncertain 155 kt/899 mb. I’ll conclude by saying that no matter what one may determine, themselves, it’s virtually impossible to argue that Melissa retained its peak strength through landfall and/or it was actually still intensifying at that time.
4 likes   

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 12072
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2957 Postby GCANE » Fri Oct 31, 2025 4:44 am

0 likes   

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 12072
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2958 Postby GCANE » Fri Oct 31, 2025 4:48 am

0 likes   

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 12072
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2959 Postby GCANE » Fri Oct 31, 2025 4:52 am

0 likes   

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 12072
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2960 Postby GCANE » Fri Oct 31, 2025 4:55 am

0 likes   


Return to “2025”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests