Could Rita STILL be strengthening???
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
Coredesat
- MGC
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 5937
- Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 9:05 pm
- Location: Pass Christian MS, or what is left.
Rita's 23 mile wide eye is hampering the winds. If say Rita had a pinhole eye of say 8-10 miles across than with a 897mb central pressure winds would be up around 185mph easy. The pressure gradient across the storm is the determining factor. I still think Rita could drop a few more mb before the night is over. If the eye starts to contract than watch out Gilbert......MGC
0 likes
- AL Chili Pepper
- Category 3

- Posts: 873
- Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 1:15 pm
- Location: Mobile, AL
MGC wrote:Rita's 23 mile wide eye is hampering the winds. If say Rita had a pinhole eye of say 8-10 miles across than with a 897mb central pressure winds would be up around 185mph easy. The pressure gradient across the storm is the determining factor. I still think Rita could drop a few more mb before the night is over. If the eye starts to contract than watch out Gilbert......MGC
I was watching TWC a little while ago and they did comment that the eye might be contracting a little.
0 likes
- Pebbles
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 1994
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 1:42 pm
- Location: New Lenox, IL (SW of Chicago)
Mattie wrote:MGC - I have been watching TV all evening and I think I saw something on a news report that the eye was 70 miles in diameter and unprecedented. . .
I know I didn't dream it, but "ye of so little knowledge" here
M
LOL NHC is say the diameter of the eye is 20nm
edit: BUT... Hurricane force winds go OUT 70miles from the center. That's wehre the 70 probably came from
Last edited by Pebbles on Wed Sep 21, 2005 10:46 pm, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes
-
fasterdisaster
- Category 5

- Posts: 1868
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:41 pm
- Location: Miami, Florida
soonertwister wrote:It's just pathetic how NHC has thus far treated this historic weather event. The numbers easily supported 160 knots / 185 mph, and they chose to downplay the storm.
They used the crutch of no further recon flights for hours as the comfort cushion they needed to whitewash the danger. They are so afraid of their shadows right now, don't drop a pin in the same room, or you might see an unanticipated negative event.
You know, like a hurricane named Rita.
I understand the tension and nervousness that surround those in danger from this storm but I think the comments are out of line and unfounded.
How can you say the NHC is whitewashing the danger.
Can it be any clearer?
I have not seen the NHC downplay the extreme danger of this storm or of Katrina.
And as Brent says there is a recon on its way.
But if there wasn;t what difference does it make if the storm is at 175, 185 or 200?
Setting records is hardly important at this point...
It is still unspeakably dangerous and if it is a Cat 4 or 5, the consequences are dire for wherever she strikes.
I don't really know what y'all are looking for
0 likes
-
yhbrooklyn
- Tropical Wave

- Posts: 1
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2005 1:20 pm
-
Brent
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 38264
- Age: 37
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
- Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
- Contact:
Mattie wrote:Well, instead if the "OH CRAP" preset standard, if the 70 miles holds true, that deserves at least a OMG/GEEZ/That's big!!/that would entail quite a bit of area comment!
My personal favorite is "I didn't really hear that did I?"
It's not 70 miles wide... if it was, you would know by looking at satellite.
0 likes
#neversummer
-
InimanaChoogamaga
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 267 guests


