What storms should be retired vs. what names will be retired

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
Aqua Teen Hunger Force

What storms should be retired vs. what names will be retired

#1 Postby Aqua Teen Hunger Force » Sat Oct 08, 2005 3:40 pm

So in another thread we hear about 1,100 dead from a mudslide caused by Stan. If this happened in America, Stan would be automatically retired. But since this happened in Mexico, it's anyone's guess. That's sad.

Are there any other casses like this in 2005?
0 likes   

mtm4319
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1537
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 2:47 am
Location: Mobile, AL

#2 Postby mtm4319 » Sat Oct 08, 2005 3:53 pm

I think it's a clear-cut case for Dennis, Emily, Katrina, Rita, and probably Stan, but none of the other ones have any more than the slimmest shot (aka Ophelia).
0 likes   

User avatar
gilbert88
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 367
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 12:57 pm

Re: What storms should be retired vs. what names will be ret

#3 Postby gilbert88 » Sat Oct 08, 2005 3:55 pm

Aqua Teen Hunger Force wrote:So in another thread we hear about 1,100 dead from a mudslide caused by Stan. If this happened in America, Stan would be automatically retired. But since this happened in Mexico, it's anyone's guess. That's sad.

Are there any other casses like this in 2005?


Stan is pretty much retired now. Some people seem to think it shouldn't because it wasn't a Cat. 5, but it will be retired.

Isidore killed 3 and was retired... why shouldn't Stan, it's already proven deadlier and costlier.
0 likes   

mtm4319
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1537
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 2:47 am
Location: Mobile, AL

Re: What storms should be retired vs. what names will be ret

#4 Postby mtm4319 » Sat Oct 08, 2005 3:58 pm

gilbert88 wrote:
Aqua Teen Hunger Force wrote:So in another thread we hear about 1,100 dead from a mudslide caused by Stan. If this happened in America, Stan would be automatically retired. But since this happened in Mexico, it's anyone's guess. That's sad.

Are there any other casses like this in 2005?


Stan is pretty much retired now. Some people seem to think it shouldn't because it wasn't a Cat. 5, but it will be retired.

Isidore killed 3 and was retired... why shouldn't Stan, it's already proven deadlier and costlier.


If Isidore killed 3 people, then it was retired for some other reason.
0 likes   

aerojad
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 199
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 9:26 pm
Location: Detroit, MI
Contact:

#5 Postby aerojad » Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:12 pm

Now that Stan has killed thousands, I toss my hat into the "retire Stan" pool.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#6 Postby Derek Ortt » Sat Oct 08, 2005 5:32 pm

Isidore was retired because it made landfall as a 110KT cat 3 hurricane and flattened the entire north coast of the Yucatan, including a large portion of Merida
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#7 Postby wxmann_91 » Sat Oct 08, 2005 6:17 pm

Saddest case is Gordon 1994. Killed thousands in Haiti but we will see it again next year. :roll:
0 likes   

User avatar
Aslkahuna
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4550
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 5:00 pm
Location: Tucson, AZ
Contact:

#8 Postby Aslkahuna » Sat Oct 08, 2005 6:38 pm

If Gordon wasn't retired it would be because either Haiti didn't request it or because they are not a member of the WMO and thus can't make the request. Mexico will probably ask for Stan to be retired-after all, they've gotten other storm names retired including a couple of EPAC ones.

Steve
0 likes   

User avatar
Dr. Jonah Rainwater
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 569
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 2:45 pm
Location: Frisco, Texas
Contact:

#9 Postby Dr. Jonah Rainwater » Sun Oct 09, 2005 2:13 am

Cesar of 1996 was a Category One that killed about 50 people in Nicuragua, and it was retired. Diana killed around 50 people as well, just in Mexico, and was retired.

A tragedy is a tragedy is a tragedy. And this is a big tragedy. The death toll is higher than Katrina's.
0 likes   

User avatar
Dr. Jonah Rainwater
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 569
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 2:45 pm
Location: Frisco, Texas
Contact:

#10 Postby Dr. Jonah Rainwater » Sun Oct 09, 2005 2:17 am

Although honestly, I personally don't think Emily should be retired. I know she was extremely strong, and extremely unusual, but she weakened before she hit a relatively low-populated region of the Yucatan, and then became one of 4 hurricanes to strengthen into major hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico this year, before hitting another sparsely-populated area of Mexico. The death toll for the entire system, including traffic accidents, was 8. I think Tropical Storm Gert had a comparable death toll. And the tourist areas around Cancun, and the economic centers around Tampico and Veracruz were virtually left alone.

Of course, when you put together this Emily, and the Emily of 1993 in North Carolina, and the Emily of 1987 in the Dominican Republic...there are probably enough sheer memories attatched to this name to get it retired.
0 likes   

HurricaneBill
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA

#11 Postby HurricaneBill » Sun Oct 09, 2005 3:53 am

Emily made two major landfalls on Mexico. Emily was very damaging on the second landfall.

Remember, Hurricane Anita in 1977 made landfall in a very sparsely populated area of Mexico as an upper-end Category 4.
10 people were killed and forests were pretty much flattened.

Although a pretty much forgotten storm nowadays, Hurricane Anita was extremely vital in regards to hurricane research. I'm sure Derek probably knows the importance of Anita in hurricane research.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#12 Postby Derek Ortt » Sun Oct 09, 2005 4:13 am

Anita is one storm I have not looked at or am very familiar with


That said, I do know its history quite well

As for Emily, the NE Mexican coast is as bad off, if not worse than Cameron and Mississippi. I saw damage photos there on a spanish TV station in Miami and let me tell you, what occurred there was far worse than the Tsunami from last year. That area received the worst destruction of any area in the 2005 hurricane season. Nearly every house was removed from its foundation
0 likes   

User avatar
Dr. Jonah Rainwater
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 569
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 2:45 pm
Location: Frisco, Texas
Contact:

#13 Postby Dr. Jonah Rainwater » Mon Oct 10, 2005 12:36 am

Oh...I had no idea. I wonder why the US Media gave it such lousy coverage? I guess it missed Cancun and Brownsville and that was all they really cared about. I've noticed that, since the worldwide attention and outpouring from Katrina, we seem to be alot more aware of disasters in other countries, like Stan and the earthquake in Pakistan. That's good, I guess.
0 likes   

User avatar
Buck
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1199
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 12:04 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

#14 Postby Buck » Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:10 am

I think all 5 of the "big ones" will be retired.
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

#15 Postby senorpepr » Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:32 am

Dr. Jonah Rainwater wrote:Oh...I had no idea. I wonder why the US Media gave it such lousy coverage? I guess it missed Cancun and Brownsville and that was all they really cared about. I've noticed that, since the worldwide attention and outpouring from Katrina, we seem to be alot more aware of disasters in other countries, like Stan and the earthquake in Pakistan. That's good, I guess.


Unfortunately, global coverage of tropical cyclones has been very limited until around Katrina when the media started picking up on the abnormal amount of cyclones this season. Now the media will jump on anything tropical cyclone-related. Honestly, I'm surprised I haven't heard much about TD 21W in the WPAC.

It's kind of like the shark attacks a few years ago. Although nothing was abnormal about it, it was being publicized more. The media jumped all over it and before we knew it, every single shark attack became the top story. Well... until September 11th happened and then the shark "quit" attacking.
0 likes   

User avatar
ohiostorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1582
Age: 40
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 2:51 pm
Location: Orlando, FL
Contact:

#16 Postby ohiostorm » Mon Oct 10, 2005 10:18 am

Is 5 the most number to get retired in one season? Or is it 4?
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

#17 Postby senorpepr » Mon Oct 10, 2005 10:31 am

ohiostorm wrote:Is 5 the most number to get retired in one season? Or is it 4?


Four is the record, set in 1995 and 2004.
0 likes   

User avatar
Buck
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1199
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 12:04 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

#18 Postby Buck » Mon Oct 10, 2005 2:26 pm

senorpepr wrote:
ohiostorm wrote:Is 5 the most number to get retired in one season? Or is it 4?


Four is the record, set in 1995 and 2004.


Don't forget 1955.
0 likes   

Anonymous

#19 Postby Anonymous » Mon Oct 10, 2005 3:09 pm

I think the following should have been retired:::

Alberto 1994
Gordon 1994
Bertha 1996
Bonnie 1998
0 likes   

User avatar
Buck
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1199
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 12:04 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

#20 Postby Buck » Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:25 pm

~Floydbuster wrote:I think the following should have been retired:::

Alberto 1994
Gordon 1994
Bertha 1996
Bonnie 1998


I agree... at least with Alberto and Gordon for sure. Bertha and Bonnie... I think that they could've been retired, but to me its not as big a deal as Alberto and Gordon.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: chaser1, StormWeather, Team Ghost, Wein and 314 guests