Scorpion wrote:That model run is good news.... means a more northern landfall point.
Not necessarily. This is the set up I and others owuld fear for a Tampa Bay landfall
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Bgator wrote:That doesnt look right can i have link!? and model should be out till 2am earliest!
caneman wrote:Scorpion wrote:That model run is good news.... means a more northern landfall point.
Not necessarily. This is the set up I and others owuld fear for a Tampa Bay landfall
caneman wrote:Scorpion wrote:That model run is good news.... means a more northern landfall point.
Not necessarily. This is the set up I and others owuld fear for a Tampa Bay landfall
jkt21787 wrote:NOGAPS btw was also the model consistently taking it into the Yucatan and Central America and is generally not great. And again lets not predict the outcome based on one image...
floridahurricaneguy wrote:caneman wrote:Scorpion wrote:That model run is good news.... means a more northern landfall point.
Not necessarily. This is the set up I and others owuld fear for a Tampa Bay landfall
Nhc's wording in 11pm made them seem not real uncomfortable with current path. Also new data for 00z for my synoptic set up or whatever its called.
Matt
floridahurricaneguy wrote:caneman wrote:Scorpion wrote:That model run is good news.... means a more northern landfall point.
Not necessarily. This is the set up I and others owuld fear for a Tampa Bay landfall
Nhc's wording in 11pm made them seem not real uncomfortable with current path. Also new data for 00z for my synoptic set up or whatever its called.
Matt
ericinmia wrote:Ok... the upper air data has to have screwed up the model and given it a bias.
The 0z GFS is doing the same thing as the NOGAPS it appears. Albeit beginning to curve it...
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... loop.shtml
A lot of times the upper air data if flawed or tainted or if not complete can give a huge bias to the runs... i will need to see the 18z do the same as this for me to agree with it.
-Eric
ericinmia wrote:Bgator wrote:That doesnt look right can i have link!? and model should be out till 2am earliest!
This rapid update site gets it MUCH sooner than anywhere else. It is the source.
It is a little hard to use for the novice though... and you can't direct link to most things. But its nice.
https://www.fnmoc.navy.mil/mywxmap/logi ... name=guest
Bgator wrote:ericinmia wrote:Bgator wrote:That doesnt look right can i have link!? and model should be out till 2am earliest!
This rapid update site gets it MUCH sooner than anywhere else. It is the source.
It is a little hard to use for the novice though... and you can't direct link to most things. But its nice.
https://www.fnmoc.navy.mil/mywxmap/logi ... name=guest
That one begins to curve it atleast i would like to wait one mor emodel run to see what happens =(18z)... They look like they are slowing the trof!
DESTRUCTION5 wrote:Bgator wrote:ericinmia wrote:Bgator wrote:That doesnt look right can i have link!? and model should be out till 2am earliest!
This rapid update site gets it MUCH sooner than anywhere else. It is the source.
It is a little hard to use for the novice though... and you can't direct link to most things. But its nice.
https://www.fnmoc.navy.mil/mywxmap/logi ... name=guest
That one begins to curve it atleast i would like to wait one mor emodel run to see what happens =(18z)... They look like they are slowing the trof!
Not to me...Looks like a Brutal Oct trough to say the least...
MortisFL wrote:The 00z GFS is slower this run...just emerging from the Yucatan passage into the GOM in 102 hrs.
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... _102.shtml
MortisFL wrote:The 00z GFS is slower this run...just emerging from the Yucatan passage into the GOM in 102 hrs.
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... _102.shtml
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests