Man Ordered to Remove 'Jesus Is Lord' Sign

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
southerngale
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 27418
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)

Man Ordered to Remove 'Jesus Is Lord' Sign

#1 Postby southerngale » Wed May 28, 2003 1:37 pm

I continue to be amazed at some people...and very disappointed. Can't those idiot officials find something worthwhile to complain about? I mean, Come on!

What is this world coming to????? :o

-------------------------------------------------------

BEDFORD, Pa. — A large neon sign that reads "Jesus is Lord" is catching heat from the managers of this historic borough.

Officials are threatening businessman Bob Foor with 30 days in jail if he refuses to remove the 3 1/2-feet-tall and nearly 100-feet-wide flashing red sign from a massive old building he owns in the heart of the borough's historic district.

Foor, who spent $10,000 on the sign, says it's his constitutional right.

"I feel they're violating my freedom of speech and my freedom to express my religion," Foor said.

The row began a year ago when Foor sought permission from the borough's historical review board to put up the sign. The board denied the request because of the size of the sign and the use of neon, both of which failed to comply with the district's historic appearance.

Earlier this year, Foor found out no permit was necessary to put a sign on windows, so he had the sign installed on the building windows.

"There's nothing wrong with putting beer signs on the windows, so what's wrong with this?" Foor said.

Officials, who gave Foor 10 days' notice to remove the sign, say it violates the historic district's regulations, the sign ordinance and the zoning law. Borough Manager John Montgomery added signs must be inside the window.

Letters Foor received from borough Solicitor Dean Crabtree said failure to comply could bring fines of $1,000 per day and up to 30 days in jail.
0 likes   
Please support Storm2k by making a donation today. It is greatly appreciated! Click here: Image

Image my Cowboys Image my RocketsImage my Astros

User avatar
therock1811
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5163
Age: 39
Joined: Thu May 15, 2003 2:15 pm
Location: Kentucky
Contact:

#2 Postby therock1811 » Wed May 28, 2003 1:43 pm

What IS this world coming to???....sheesh!
0 likes   

User avatar
mf_dolphin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 17758
Age: 68
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 2:05 pm
Location: St Petersburg, FL
Contact:

#3 Postby mf_dolphin » Wed May 28, 2003 2:36 pm

But remember folks..."Give unto Ceasar what is Ceasar..." My read on the post is that he is in clear violation of the zoning ordinance. Freedon of speech does not give you the right to break a law doing it. I happen to agree with his sign but it should be done in accordance with local laws. :-) If he complies with the law, or gets the law ruled unconstitutional, then more power to him :-)
0 likes   

chadtm80

#4 Postby chadtm80 » Wed May 28, 2003 2:41 pm

Agree mf... If he is breaking the law, then it dosent matter what the sign says... If the law says its to big - get a smaller one... If its Ilegal to have a neon, then get white lights... Now in just this article alone it is not very clear on if he is out of compliance for sure... but if he is, then he is in the wrong.. We will have to see if anything else develops
0 likes   

Rainband

#5 Postby Rainband » Wed May 28, 2003 2:45 pm

Yes folks..I think this is more about the sign itself..than it's message!!! If it was because of what the sign said..then I would be pissed!!!!!! :wink:
0 likes   

User avatar
southerngale
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 27418
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)

#6 Postby southerngale » Wed May 28, 2003 2:56 pm

From my understanding, he wanted to put it somewhere besides the window and that failed to comply with the district's historic appearance. So earlier this year he found out no permit was necessary to put a sign on windows, so he had the sign installed on the building windows. I don't see how that is breaking the law. I could be wrong, but it seems to me somebody doesn't like the message.
0 likes   
Please support Storm2k by making a donation today. It is greatly appreciated! Click here: Image

Image my Cowboys Image my RocketsImage my Astros

chadtm80

#7 Postby chadtm80 » Wed May 28, 2003 2:59 pm

Right... The article is not clear enough... We would need to know what the local laws are...
0 likes   

User avatar
mf_dolphin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 17758
Age: 68
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 2:05 pm
Location: St Petersburg, FL
Contact:

#8 Postby mf_dolphin » Wed May 28, 2003 3:11 pm

It's not clear, but it this line "Borough Manager John Montgomery added signs must be inside the window. " implies that the sign was outside the window. :-)
0 likes   

Rainband

#9 Postby Rainband » Wed May 28, 2003 3:47 pm

That explains the problem..unless they just don't like what it says!!! I think it's just a code violation and nothing more..I hope anyway!! :wink:
0 likes   

User avatar
coriolis
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 8314
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 10:58 pm
Location: Muncy, PA

#10 Postby coriolis » Wed May 28, 2003 10:51 pm

Holy Cow! That's my home town. I think I went to high school with that guy. If it's the same person, he's changed a lot! God works in great ways. I'll have to email my folks to get the latest on this. Bedford is a rather small town (5 stoplights, total) and that's got to be very hard to miss.
0 likes   
This space for rent.


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests