
Wow - that's deep into it. hmmmmmm Does give me something to think about though. Wish I was a bit more politically savy than I am.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Stephanie wrote:It only looks to me like President Bush did what he had to do after the results of the election. I think that he's almost loyal to his advisors to a fault.
j wrote:correct me if I'm wrong. Rumsfeld resigned, Bush accepted it this time. Previous posts are making it sound like because of the election results Bush DID what he had to do.
vbhoutex wrote:Stephanie wrote:It only looks to me like President Bush did what he had to do after the results of the election. I think that he's almost loyal to his advisors to a fault.
For once you and I agree here. It will be interesting to see how this all works out. I think we need to "get the job done", but the road to the end of that job is not totally clear, nor will it be an easy one no matter how it is handled.
Regit wrote:For those who follow politics, this is a bizarre story. It's almost as if the GOP threw the election on purpose.
The more I think about it, the more I wonder if it's true. A solid Republican majority would have looked increasingly corrupt to the public. Additionally, a divided Washington could create the next best thing to Laissez-faire, which helps the economy in the short term (though not in the long term as we learned in the 1920's). A President and his party always get credit for a booming economy.
Is it a total coincidence that the day that the focus should be on the Democrats, the news switches back to something extremely positive coming out of the White House?
If the GOP had stayed in power, the Democrats could possibly have won the White House in 2008 even if they'd run Saddam.
Could the "blue tidal wave" be Karl Rove's ultimate genius play? Something to ponder.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests