Tropical Depression HUMBERTO Discussion & Images

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
PTrackerLA
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5277
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
Location: Lafayette, LA

Re: T.S.HUMBERTO (GOM): Discussion & Images:7 PM CDT page 36

#961 Postby PTrackerLA » Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:29 pm

I'm becoming more concerned about this thing making landfall as far east as Cameron Parish and then grazing through south Louisiana tomorrow. It has clearly shifted more east and it looks looks almost ENE on Lake Charles radar loop: http://radar.weather.gov/radar.php?prod ... h&loop=yes


I don't know what to think! Oh and the "eye" has completely cleared out per LCH radar.
0 likes   

User avatar
Downdraft
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 906
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 8:45 pm
Location: Sanford, Florida
Contact:

Re: T.S.HUMBERTO (GOM): Discussion & Images:7 PM CDT page 36

#962 Postby Downdraft » Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:30 pm

You can kiss any thoughts of intensification good-bye. Dry air intrusion is eating the western side of the system for lunch. As for the question is that an eye on radar, not by the classic concept of a true tropical system eye. It is the closed loop LLC of the system. You usually don't see a real eye till a cyclone reaches CAT II although strong CAT I's have produced a similar feature.
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: T.S.HUMBERTO (GOM): Discussion & Images:7 PM CDT page 36

#963 Postby Stormcenter » Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:31 pm

As of now I 'm looking at a TX/LA. border possible landfall.

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/loop-avn.html
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#964 Postby RL3AO » Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:34 pm

A hurricane watch is starting to seem more and more necessary for NE TX/SW LA.
0 likes   

User avatar
windstorm99
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1578
Age: 47
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 8:10 am
Location: Miami, Florida
Contact:

Re: T.S.HUMBERTO (GOM): Discussion & Images:7 PM CDT page 36

#965 Postby windstorm99 » Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:34 pm

Image
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#966 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:34 pm

I've seen true eyes in tropical storms. They tend to start forming at 50KT, though they do not show up on sat imagery until about 75-80KT

This is what i would call a poorly defined eye. It looks like an eyewall has formed, but it is very open and barely meets the 50 percent threshold, and the eye has not yet cleared out completely
0 likes   

User avatar
Weatherfreak14
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1383
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2005 3:40 pm
Location: Beaufort, SC
Contact:

Re: T.S.HUMBERTO (GOM): Discussion & Images:7 PM CDT page 36

#967 Postby Weatherfreak14 » Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:35 pm

IMO it looks actually rather good on radar, no matter how it looks though this is not good for saturated areas in TX and LA, i wish this whould of made landfall in AL or MS where they need it.
0 likes   

isobar5
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 11:26 am

Re: T.S.HUMBERTO (GOM): Discussion & Images:7 PM CDT page 36

#968 Postby isobar5 » Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:36 pm

Derek, is there any chance this thing just hugs the coast and keeps east?
0 likes   

User avatar
Downdraft
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 906
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 8:45 pm
Location: Sanford, Florida
Contact:

Re:

#969 Postby Downdraft » Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:37 pm

RL3AO wrote:A hurricane watch is starting to seem more and more necessary for NE TX/SW LA.


Based on what??? There is no data that supports a hurricane watch in anything I'm seeing here. What are you basing that on?
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: Re:

#970 Postby RL3AO » Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:38 pm

Downdraft wrote:
RL3AO wrote:A hurricane watch is starting to seem more and more necessary for NE TX/SW LA.


Based on what??? There is no data that supports a hurricane watch in anything I'm seeing here. What are you basing that on?


If it goes further east that expected, than it will have more time over water.

I guess it doesn't matter though.
0 likes   

User avatar
PTrackerLA
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5277
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
Location: Lafayette, LA

Re: T.S.HUMBERTO (GOM): Discussion & Images:7 PM CDT page 36

#971 Postby PTrackerLA » Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:39 pm

Weatherfreak14 wrote:IMO it looks actually rather good on radar, no matter how it looks though this is not good for saturated areas in TX and LA, i wish this whould of made landfall in AL or MS where they need it.


Well LA hasn't been nearly as wet as Texas. In fact, even with the rain we received today, we're officially .57" below normal for the year in Lafayette. We can handle it, just not 10 inches :lol: .
0 likes   

User avatar
swampdude
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 72
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 9:11 pm
Location: Southeast Texas

Re: T.S.HUMBERTO (GOM): Discussion & Images:7 PM CDT page 36

#972 Postby swampdude » Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:40 pm

We here on the Tx/La border do not need more rain, but I must say that it is a bit more comfortable to be in the cross-hairs of Humberto than the feeling we experienced looking down the barrel at Rita! :eek:

http://www.wunderground.com/weatherstat ... =KTXBRIDG4
0 likes   

User avatar
Tampa Bay Hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5597
Age: 37
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

Re: T.S.HUMBERTO (GOM): Discussion & Images:7 PM CDT page 36

#973 Postby Tampa Bay Hurricane » Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:46 pm

Judging by an WSW-ENE orientation of the front
axis, a ENE movement is possible.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22979
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: T.S.HUMBERTO (GOM): Discussion & Images:7 PM CDT page 36

#974 Postby wxman57 » Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:46 pm

I think predicting a LA landfall is quite a bit of a stretch. More like eastern Bolivar Peninsula (just east of Galveston Bay) early tomorrow morning. No significant change in strength prior to landfall, except maybe a little weaker with the dry air entrainment.
0 likes   

User avatar
PTrackerLA
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5277
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
Location: Lafayette, LA

Re: T.S.HUMBERTO (GOM): Discussion & Images:7 PM CDT page 36

#975 Postby PTrackerLA » Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:47 pm

Looks like on the latest radar frames the center has pulled up north a little. Hard to tell exactly as it has become a little more ragged in appearance.
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: T.S.HUMBERTO (GOM): Discussion & Images:7 PM CDT page 36

#976 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:50 pm

Kludge wrote:
wxman57 wrote:Doesn't look like much for Houston as far as I can see, either. I notice the eastward shift and dry air intrusion. Humberto and I will be passing each other as I drive to work tomorrow morning at 5:30 on I-45. Probably just some light rain from I-45 west. Would have been interesting to see at least 20-30 mph wind blowing through the trees.


The rules of this forum will not allow me to "question" the forecasts of a pro met. But looking back on your calls from yesterday, versus what this turned into by mid day today is.... interesting.

So I'll just say that...uh...it turned out that your forecast for Houston was... ummm... genius. :wink: Nice job!



Well, maybe Joe Bastardi's prediction yesterday morning of sustained TS winds in Texas might also be wrong, if the center can hang a little further East.

Although after moving NE, looks like maybe a wobble closer to due North. Tricky, because on HGX radar something sort of weird looking happening near the center.
0 likes   

User avatar
Weatherfreak14
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1383
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2005 3:40 pm
Location: Beaufort, SC
Contact:

Re: T.S.HUMBERTO (GOM): Discussion & Images:7 PM CDT page 36

#977 Postby Weatherfreak14 » Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:53 pm

Is it just me or has it really taken a wooble to the north or NNW on GRX radar.
Last edited by Weatherfreak14 on Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Sean in New Orleans
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1794
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 7:26 pm
Location: New Orleans, LA 30.0N 90.0W
Contact:

#978 Postby Sean in New Orleans » Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:53 pm

It's not very impressive, at all. Just a little tropical storm, but, it needs to do some jogging N. if it is going to hit Texas (which it may be doing), but, either way, all of the weather is going to be to the East, so no matter where the center really falls, it's obvious 90% of all weather associated with the system will be in Louisiana....which is fine. This isn't going to hurt anybody or anything, IMO.
0 likes   

User avatar
BigA
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1317
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 10:56 pm

Re: T.S.HUMBERTO (GOM): Discussion & Images:7 PM CDT page 36

#979 Postby BigA » Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:53 pm

Interesting how convection can be building on the western side on infrared, but the rain shield being eroded on the western side. I dont exactly understand.
0 likes   

User avatar
Weatherfreak14
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1383
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2005 3:40 pm
Location: Beaufort, SC
Contact:

Re: T.S.HUMBERTO (GOM): Discussion & Images:7 PM CDT page 36

#980 Postby Weatherfreak14 » Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:55 pm

BigA wrote:Interesting how convection can be building on the western side on infrared, but the rain shield being eroded on the western side. I dont exactly understand.


The storm must be fickled... :lol: But it does seem to be turning back almost due north and a jog to the NNW?
0 likes   


Return to “2007”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests