ATL : TROPICAL DEPRESSION ERIKA (06L)
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Re: ATL : INVEST 94L - Computer Models
SEASON_CANCELED wrote:Models are worthless at this point. There still is no storm, or storm center. All they do is show a general track which doesnt answer the question of wether it will impact the CONUS or not.
for the trillionth time
YOU DO NOT NEED A CENTER FOR A DYNAMICAL MODEL TO BE OF VALUE. IT IS ABLE TO FORM A CENTER ON ITS OWN. PLEASE STOP SPREADING THIS MYTH. ONLY A MODEL WITH A MOVING NEST NEEDS A CENTER DUE TO THE WAY THE FORTRAN PROGRAMS ARE WRITTEN
0 likes
- wxman57
- Moderator-Pro Met
- Posts: 22987
- Age: 67
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
- Location: Houston, TX (southwest)
Re: ATL : INVEST 94L
Here's a new surface plot/satellite. Crosshairs represent where the NHC put the "center" on the latest model initialization. I might put it a bit west of there, but there really is no center yet. Definitely not getting better organized this morning. WV loop does indicate the upper low to its west may be lifting out to the north and/or weakening, though.


0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 6684
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
- Location: Houston, TX
-
- Tropical Low
- Posts: 41
- Age: 52
- Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 2:24 pm
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Re: ATL : INVEST 94L
Quick question - outflow boundaries on Plains thunderstorms are often indicators of a collapsing storm. How do they feature in the organization of a developing TD?
I.e. is this a signature of increasing or decreasing organization of 94L?
I.e. is this a signature of increasing or decreasing organization of 94L?
0 likes
- Gustywind
- Category 5
- Posts: 12334
- Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 7:29 am
- Location: Baie-Mahault, GUADELOUPE
Re: Re:
Stormcenter wrote:I guess this is a joke right?Gustywind wrote:Latest
Why,? Explain your thought please


0 likes
Re: ATL : INVEST 94L - Computer Models
Derek Ortt wrote:SEASON_CANCELED wrote:Models are worthless at this point. There still is no storm, or storm center. All they do is show a general track which doesnt answer the question of wether it will impact the CONUS or not.
for the trillionth time
YOU DO NOT NEED A CENTER FOR A DYNAMICAL MODEL TO BE OF VALUE. IT IS ABLE TO FORM A CENTER ON ITS OWN. PLEASE STOP SPREADING THIS MYTH. ONLY A MODEL WITH A MOVING NEST NEEDS A CENTER DUE TO THE WAY THE FORTRAN PROGRAMS ARE WRITTEN
Derek, need more coffee this morning?

Plese explain it gently to us amateurs, my ears hurt this early in the morning!

0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 2263
- Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 12:42 pm
- Location: Pensacola, Florida
Allan Huffman's (RaleighWeather) take on 94L this morning for those who are interested. http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-4053-Raleigh-Weather-Examiner~y2009m9d1-Invest-94-has-plenty-of-question-marks
0 likes
Re: ATL : INVEST 94L
17n 55w area, this could be where the LLC is forming.
anyway, back to work.
anyway, back to work.
0 likes
-
- Military Met
- Posts: 4372
- Age: 56
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
- Location: Roan Mountain, TN
Re: ATL : INVEST 94L
Evil Jeremy wrote: I see what he is seeing, but I don't think it is an LLC.
I see it too...nice little vort center but its difficult to tell if there are any west winds south of it. My guess is no. Looks like some really good SW winds near 15.5 N...but this is above the sfc so who knows what is going on at the sfc. My guess is we have a very sharp cusp tilted back to the NE.
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1740
- Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2003 10:53 am
- Location: Nags Head, NC
- Contact:
I finally understand now why tpc hasn't called this. After Danny they want to be sure this is truly tropical. The future Ericka's structure still isn't there. The llc still appears to not be centered below the cdo. The cdo is far more symmetrical than Danny so it appears more organized. I don't think they will call until recon finds a center. I do feel that in this case the llc will locate itself under the cdo which Danny never did. Because this has slowed I do feel that it will cause headaches early next week. Hoping for another fish, but no sure yet.
Anyway, I do think that we will have to deal with a nor'easter from the OBX to maybe Delaware before it heads ne this weekend. I think that the wave in front of 94l will combine with one of the lows that are coming off the ec trough.
One personal note. It can stop raining now. August was one of the wettest on record here
Anyway, I do think that we will have to deal with a nor'easter from the OBX to maybe Delaware before it heads ne this weekend. I think that the wave in front of 94l will combine with one of the lows that are coming off the ec trough.
One personal note. It can stop raining now. August was one of the wettest on record here

0 likes
- lrak
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1770
- Age: 58
- Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 2:48 pm
- Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Re: ATL : INVEST 94L - Computer Models
Derek Ortt wrote:SEASON_CANCELED wrote:Models are worthless at this point. There still is no storm, or storm center. All they do is show a general track which doesnt answer the question of wether it will impact the CONUS or not.
for the trillionth time
YOU DO NOT NEED A CENTER FOR A DYNAMICAL MODEL TO BE OF VALUE. IT IS ABLE TO FORM A CENTER ON ITS OWN. PLEASE STOP SPREADING THIS MYTH. ONLY A MODEL WITH A MOVING NEST NEEDS A CENTER DUE TO THE WAY THE FORTRAN PROGRAMS ARE WRITTEN


Does anyone NOT understand?
0 likes
- jasons2k
- Storm2k Executive
- Posts: 8245
- Age: 51
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
- Location: The Woodlands, TX
Re: ATL : INVEST 94L
otowntiger wrote:jasons wrote:curtadams wrote:That Quickscat shows a really bizarre windfield. This is a weird one.
Looks like a classic open wave, which it probably is based on that center fix provided by WxMan57.
I don't think there's anything classic about this system. It is an odd one no doubt. But I do agree there is no closed circulation at this time, and it may not ever have one if Derek's observations about the effects of the trough continue to pan out.
It's an open wave that has been struggling to consolidate and can't. Quickscat and surface obs confirm that. What's so odd about that?
0 likes
Re:
SunnyThoughts wrote:Allan Huffman's (RaleighWeather) take on 94L this morning for those who are interested. http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-4053-Raleigh-Weather-Examiner~y2009m9d1-Invest-94-has-plenty-of-question-marks
I read that earlier and thought it was well thought out and presented so us amateurs could understand the dynamics of what is going on.
0 likes
Re: ATL : INVEST 94L - Computer Models
Derek Ortt wrote:SEASON_CANCELED wrote:Models are worthless at this point. There still is no storm, or storm center. All they do is show a general track which doesnt answer the question of wether it will impact the CONUS or not.
for the trillionth time
YOU DO NOT NEED A CENTER FOR A DYNAMICAL MODEL TO BE OF VALUE. IT IS ABLE TO FORM A CENTER ON ITS OWN. PLEASE STOP SPREADING THIS MYTH. ONLY A MODEL WITH A MOVING NEST NEEDS A CENTER DUE TO THE WAY THE FORTRAN PROGRAMS ARE WRITTEN
Can a mod resize this text. It hurts my eyes to read such large text + it is slightly demeaning to the poster.
0 likes
Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

Coffee all around this morning! Hope this helps!
Please be gentle everyone. This system is going to teach us all alot about patience, I am afraid, both with it and one another.
Reading the link above from SunnyThoughts explains it fairly well why.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests