ATL : TROPICAL DEPRESSION ALEX - MODELS
Moderator: S2k Moderators
- somethingfunny
- ChatStaff
- Posts: 3926
- Age: 37
- Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 10:30 pm
- Location: McKinney, Texas
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 2718
- Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
- Location: Beaumont, TX
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 38090
- Age: 36
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
- Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
- Contact:
Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS
ROCK wrote:and I stayed up for this.....NO more I tell you...
LOL!
0 likes
#neversummer
Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS
The spread will probably shift more towards the right and away from mexico. we've been through this time and time again...EURO is a west outlier... HWRF is a right outlier. What's NOGAPS say?
0 likes
- South Texas Storms
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 4226
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
- Location: Houston, TX
Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS
the models are driving me crazy! i just want to know where this thing is going already! dont yall feel the same?
0 likes
- southerngale
- Retired Staff
- Posts: 27418
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
- Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)
Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS
ROCK wrote:and I stayed up for this.....NO more I tell you...
Yeah, right. See you tomorrow night. Same time, same place.

0 likes
Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS
Ivanhater wrote:Well...the spread in the models continues
I blame you Ivan...

Peace out
0 likes
- Ivanhater
- Storm2k Moderator
- Posts: 11161
- Age: 38
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
- Location: Pensacola
Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS
southerngale wrote:South Texas Storms wrote:so the spread now is anywhere from mexico to new orleans it appears...
that sure is a big spread
Mexico to Florida! Crazy.
Yep, Euro is furthest south with Mexico...HWRF furthers east around Destin, Florida....glad we got it narrowed down tonight.
0 likes
Michael
- South Texas Storms
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 4226
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
- Location: Houston, TX
Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS
Weatherfreak000 wrote:The spread will probably shift more towards the right and away from mexico. we've been through this time and time again...EURO is a west outlier... HWRF is a right outlier. What's NOGAPS say?
the nogaps is actually my favorite model presently. it has a weak tropical system moving wnw into south texas!
0 likes
- southerngale
- Retired Staff
- Posts: 27418
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
- Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)
Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS
South Texas Storms wrote:the models are driving me crazy! i just want to know where this thing is going already! dont yall feel the same?
If you're going to track tropical systems, particularly something that hasn't even developed yet, you're going to have to learn some patience, or you'll drive yourself and the rest of us crazy.
0 likes
- South Texas Storms
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 4226
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
- Location: Houston, TX
Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS
southerngale wrote:South Texas Storms wrote:the models are driving me crazy! i just want to know where this thing is going already! dont yall feel the same?
If you're going to track tropical systems, particularly something that hasn't even developed yet, you're going to have to learn some patience, or you'll drive yourself and the rest of us crazy.
haha yeah i know. this helps me to get up in the morning though!
0 likes
Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS
0 likes
- South Texas Storms
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 4226
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
- Location: Houston, TX
Very interesting ECM run, looks like it hits somewhere close to where Bret/Stan made landfall in 2005. ECM looks way too slow to landfall, will probably be inland in 48hrs or so...also makes something of the leftovers behind 93L as well...
Anyway year there is a lot of spread, I feel the westerly models are more likely given the models that recurve are showing one hell of a trough which I think is overdone.
Anyway year there is a lot of spread, I feel the westerly models are more likely given the models that recurve are showing one hell of a trough which I think is overdone.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
- AJC3
- Admin
- Posts: 3999
- Age: 61
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
- Location: Ballston Spa, New York
- Contact:
Re:
KWT wrote:Very interesting ECM run, looks like it hits somewhere close to where Bret/Stan made landfall in 2005. ECM looks way too slow to landfall, will probably be inland in 48hrs or so...also makes something of the leftovers behind 93L as well...
Anyway year there is a lot of spread, I feel the westerly models are more likely given the models that recurve are showing one hell of a trough which I think is overdone.
The 24/00Z ECM actually brings 93L inland near Veracruz, MX Tuesday morning. The system that it brings up to near Brownsville on 3 July is actually the leftovers that you mention. The model spins up the second low between 150 and 180 hours out as it crosses from east of the Yucatan to the Bay of Campeche.
0 likes
Oh I know, I mean the ECM is way to slow on the first landfall, this will probably be nearly on the other side of the Yucatan by 72hrs, yet alone not even on land for its first hit, the rate its going at now it'll be inland by 48-60hrs...small differences but might make all the difference to this system.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS
What I don't understand is why the HWRF has consistently shown hurricane type pressures (below 990 mb) yet only tropical storm force winds - any explaination from the METs would be helpful.
http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/hwrftc2.cgi?time=2010062400-invest93l&field=Sea+Level+Pressure&hour=Animation
http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/hwrftc2.cgi?time=2010062400-invest93l&field=Sea+Level+Pressure&hour=Animation
0 likes
Ah the HWRF has a very poor pressure-wind relationship because the way it is created, I wouldb't use the HWRF for the pressure but for the wind speeds.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
- gatorcane
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 23691
- Age: 47
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
- Location: Boca Raton, FL
It looks like the ECMWF and GFS are now both showing a wave that heads west through the Yucatan and into the BOC. The ECMWF develops a weak TS in the BOC and pushes it into Mexico. The GFS just pushes the wave into Mexico. At this point I like the consistency I am seeing with the global models and the solution from these models has been the one I have gone with for 93L since the beginning.
Looking through the posts, I am not sure why so many put down the GFS when it appears the ECMWF has veered towards the GFS solution? I do like the ECMWF as well but it's hard to believe it when one run it shows a major hurricane in the GOM and another completely drops that solution. The GFS has been consistent run after run with 93L.
Looking through the posts, I am not sure why so many put down the GFS when it appears the ECMWF has veered towards the GFS solution? I do like the ECMWF as well but it's hard to believe it when one run it shows a major hurricane in the GOM and another completely drops that solution. The GFS has been consistent run after run with 93L.
Last edited by gatorcane on Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
Yeah I agree at least with the track idea, but as Wxman57 said its because the models are showing a different wave now trying to develop, the lead wave that is 93L is not the one that is needed to be watched but the one to its east.
That explains the sudden shift well southwards again of the ECM because a system further east doesn't get scooped up by the weakness that is impinged.
That explains the sudden shift well southwards again of the ECM because a system further east doesn't get scooped up by the weakness that is impinged.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests