Wx_Warrior wrote:Yes..southern on this one
Will probably see a shift south of the GFDL...interesting to note the system is looking very sheared right now, maybe the models were right not to go overboard in terms of strengthening.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Wx_Warrior wrote:Yes..southern on this one
texbosoxfan wrote:Portastorm wrote:TexasF6 wrote:The entire Texas coastline is in play with this slow movement....everyone should at least be getting preparations made....preparedness not panic I say...my personal thoughts are landfall as a large Cat 4 between Corpus and Galeveston....
This statement has not been endorsed by any meteorological service and is simply my opinion!!!
Wow ... bold prediction to say the least!
No offense fellow Austinite ... but I hope your prediction is incorrect.
bold, and a bit irresponsible.
KWT wrote:Wx_Warrior wrote:Yes..southern on this one
Will probably see a shift south of the GFDL...interesting to note the system is looking very sheared right now, maybe the models were right not to go overboard in terms of strengthening.
Poor GFS. It finally woke up!Wx_Warrior wrote:edit: dulplicate
Looks like the GFS is now on board with a southern venture.
TexasF6 wrote:@texboxsox- (not porta)-Irresponsible? A prediction is just that a prediction. Its my half a shilling. Take it or leave it. I even said I hope I am wrong. As someone who is not a pro-met but has a few met classes at the college level under his belt, along with the knowledge that GOM storms are highly unpredictbale given history, Katrina, Claudette, Ike, Wilma, OPAL, Beluah, Carla, my point is anything is possible when these conditions favor the storm. Slow movement in th GOM is dangerous.....Right now he looks a mess. Later he won't.
KWT wrote:I'd be surprised if it got to major, conditions aloft may well become good enough though for a strengthening landfalling system though IMO, most of the models though aren't keen on going much above 65-70kts, I can only imagine the shear doesn't ease off enough to go much above that, which makes sense.
txagwxman wrote:ECMWF/UKMET will be the same too.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests