ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION TWO - DISCUSSION

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Ikester
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 361
Age: 39
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:00 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#41 Postby Ikester » Sun Jul 04, 2010 11:00 am

While 96L may track like Alex, the overall pattern is what is worrisome. That high is not going to park itself there all summer long. When August and September roll around and the high begins to break down and push east, southeast Texas could be in for some real humdingers!
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#42 Postby HURAKAN » Sun Jul 04, 2010 11:02 am

Buoys in the WCAR show east winds, which indicates that at the moment, there is no LLC
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

#43 Postby ConvergenceZone » Sun Jul 04, 2010 11:05 am

wxman57, you may be right about it not developing until it gets in the BOC. Maybe that's why they are only giving it a 20% shot of developing in the next 48 hours. Although things can change.
0 likes   

Nederlander
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1248
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 4:28 pm
Location: Conroe, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#44 Postby Nederlander » Sun Jul 04, 2010 12:25 pm

clfenwi wrote: 92L was the wave that looked good deep in the tropics, only to ultimately die in the Caribbean. 93L, which became Alex, was designated an invest when it was in the eastern Caribbean (see beginning of Alex thread and 92L thread.)


Technically Alex was the wave behind 93L.. 93L dissipated as the wave behind it caught up. The NHC just left it as 93L to make it less confusing..
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#45 Postby KWT » Sun Jul 04, 2010 12:30 pm

Looks like it has the same dual convection pattern that Alex had when it first tried to develop.

Therefore I think its fair to say this one is a little bit behind Alex at the moment. I wouldn't be surprised to see a short lived TS in the BoC.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

Weatherfreak000

Re:

#46 Postby Weatherfreak000 » Sun Jul 04, 2010 12:32 pm

KWT wrote:Looks like it has the same dual convection pattern that Alex had when it first tried to develop.

Therefore I think its fair to say this one is a little bit behind Alex at the moment. I wouldn't be surprised to see a short lived TS in the BoC.


Untrue, 96L is consolidating slightly more North and East of Alex. Models are not slamming this invest into the BoC, they are sending it through the Yucatan channel.
0 likes   

User avatar
southerngale
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 27418
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#47 Postby southerngale » Sun Jul 04, 2010 12:36 pm

Up to 30% chance - Orange


Image

ZCZC MIATWOAT ALL
TTAA00 KNHC DDHHMM
TROPICAL WEATHER OUTLOOK
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
200 PM EDT SUN JUL 4 2010

FOR THE NORTH ATLANTIC...CARIBBEAN SEA AND THE GULF OF MEXICO...

1. THERE HAS BEEN LITTLE CHANGE WITH A SMALL NON-TROPICAL AREA OF LOW
PRESSURE LOCATED ABOUT 115 MILES SOUTH-SOUTHWEST OF THE MOUTH OF
THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER. THIS LOW IS EXPECTED TO MOVE GENERALLY NORTH
OR NORTHWESTWARD AT 5 TO 10 MPH OVER THE NEXT COUPLE OF DAYS.
ENVIRONMENT CONDITIONS ARE NOT CONDUCIVE FOR DEVELOPMENT...AND
THERE IS A LOW CHANCE...10 PERCENT...OF THIS SYSTEM BECOMING A
TROPICAL CYCLONE BEFORE IT MOVES INLAND ON MONDAY.

2. SHOWERS AND THUNDERSTORMS ASSOCIATED WITH A TROPICAL WAVE OVER THE
NORTHWESTERN CARIBBEAN SEA HAVE BECOME A LITTLE BETTER ORGANIZED
AND SURFACE PRESSURES ARE BEGINNING TO FALL IN THE AREA.
CONDITIONS APPEAR FAVORABLE FOR SOME DEVELOPMENT OF THIS SYSTEM AS
IT MOVES GENERALLY WEST-NORTHWESTWARD AT ABOUT 15 MPH OVER THE NEXT
COUPLE OF DAYS. THERE IS A MEDIUM CHANCE...30 PERCENT...OF THIS
SYSTEM BECOMING A TROPICAL CYCLONE DURING THE NEXT 48 HOURS.


ELSEWHERE...TROPICAL CYCLONE FORMATION IS NOT EXPECTED DURING THE
NEXT 48 HOURS.

$$
FORECASTER BLAKE/KIMBERLAIN
NNNN
0 likes   
Please support Storm2k by making a donation today. It is greatly appreciated! Click here: Image

Image my Cowboys Image my RocketsImage my Astros

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: Re:

#48 Postby KWT » Sun Jul 04, 2010 1:05 pm

Weatherfreak000 wrote:
Untrue, 96L is consolidating slightly more North and East of Alex. Models are not slamming this invest into the BoC, they are sending it through the Yucatan channel.


Take a look at Wxman57's post where he has stated the models intilization is dead on and then compare where Alex was and you'll see they are pretty much in the same place...

The only way it goes through the Yucatan channel is if it relocates east into the eastern convection, which is possible but thats not really knowable. If it stays where it is, then its going to have to go due north from now which isn't likely.

I don't see many differences synoptically to Alex, the wildcard is 95L, if that develops and heads northwards then it will open up a weakness and draw the system from the Yucatan/CA region upto the SW Gulf but once again that is uncertain.

Still lots to wait and see over, I think this one does develop.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

rockyman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1967
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 12:24 pm
Location: Dauphin Island, AL

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#49 Postby rockyman » Sun Jul 04, 2010 1:09 pm

The orange circle is centered to the NE of the model center
0 likes   

americanre1

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#50 Postby americanre1 » Sun Jul 04, 2010 1:13 pm

Why isn't the GOES floaters over both 95L and 96L?
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#51 Postby KWT » Sun Jul 04, 2010 1:24 pm

rockyman wrote:The orange circle is centered to the NE of the model center


Probably covering the bases as its right inbetween the two lobes of convection, they did something similar with pre-Alex as well FWIW.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
Evil Jeremy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5463
Age: 31
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#52 Postby Evil Jeremy » Sun Jul 04, 2010 1:32 pm

Doc, you sent me back to the wrong week! Wait, this isn't Alex? Great Scott!

Happy July 4th everyone, and happy 25th anniversary to BTTF! Anyways, is it me, or is the NHC (although with good reason) investing systems sooner than they have done in past years? I remember last season when a system as invested at code orange. Now, even systems at 10% are getting the label.
0 likes   
Frances 04 / Jeanne 04 / Katrina 05 / Wilma 05 / Fay 08 / Debby 12 / Andrea 13 / Colin 16 / Hermine 16 / Matthew 16 / Irma 17

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 143867
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#53 Postby cycloneye » Sun Jul 04, 2010 1:33 pm

18z Best Track

Pressure down one millibar,and winds up to 30kts.

AL, 96, 2010070418, , BEST, 0, 167N, 835W, 30, 1009, DB
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#54 Postby HURAKAN » Sun Jul 04, 2010 1:37 pm

Luis, not surprised. There's a buoy reporting winds up to 27 knots.

Station 42057 - Western Caribbean
16.834 N 81.501 W

Conditions at 42057 as of
(1:50 pm EDT)
1750 GMT on 07/04/2010:

Wind Direction (WDIR): ESE ( 120 deg true )
Wind Speed (WSPD): 27.2 kts
ind Gust (GST): 33.0 kts
Wave Height (WVHT): 8.2 ft
Dominant Wave Period (DPD): 7 sec
Average Period (APD): 5.2 sec
Atmospheric Pressure (PRES): 29.86 in
Pressure Tendency (PTDY): -0.03 in ( Falling )
Water Temperature (WTMP): 84.4 �F
Dew Point (DEWP): 75.6 �F
Heat Index (HEAT): 87.4 �F
0 likes   

User avatar
wx247
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 14279
Age: 41
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 10:35 pm
Location: Monett, Missouri
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#55 Postby wx247 » Sun Jul 04, 2010 1:37 pm

americanre1 wrote:Why isn't the GOES floaters over both 95L and 96L?


Because dixiebreeze hasn't done her magic. :lol:
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#56 Postby ConvergenceZone » Sun Jul 04, 2010 1:41 pm

wow, I didn't expect a jump up to 30% to quickly...If it jumps up to 40%, then I think we are in business....
0 likes   

User avatar
Cainer
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 188
Age: 34
Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 3:26 pm
Location: Yarmouth, Nova Scotia

#57 Postby Cainer » Sun Jul 04, 2010 1:44 pm

I have a question for the pro-mets or anyone else who's knowledgeable: I've noticed that with pre-Alex and 96L the pressures of the initial disturbances were abnormally low, and I know that lower pressures increase the chances of cyclogenesis. So, do the lower ambient pressures that we're seeing across the MDR make it more likely that these disturbances develop? Or does it have more to do with the whole pressure gradient thing?
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#58 Postby KWT » Sun Jul 04, 2010 1:46 pm

I think this one certainly has a good shot at developing. I think much depends with 95L with this one though but I'd expect recon to fly into the system tomorrow providing it stays over water till then.

Current 'track' of any developing system is an interesting NW...
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#59 Postby HURAKAN » Sun Jul 04, 2010 1:49 pm

Image
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re:

#60 Postby RL3AO » Sun Jul 04, 2010 1:51 pm

Cainer wrote:I have a question for the pro-mets or anyone else who's knowledgeable: I've noticed that with pre-Alex and 96L the pressures of the initial disturbances were abnormally low, and I know that lower pressures increase the chances of cyclogenesis. So, do the lower ambient pressures that we're seeing across the MDR make it more likely that these disturbances develop? Or does it have more to do with the whole pressure gradient thing?


Lower pressures over the tropical Atlantic increases the likely hood a busy season. I'm not sure about individual storms but over an entire season it will help more systems develop because lower pressure is associated with rising air.
0 likes   


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests