Comanche wrote:Anyone care to tackle this?
Regardless of heat content, this is at May levels, way below climo and from what I gather, is an impeding factor for this.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1 ... 4/abstractExcerpt- "it would appear difficult for cyclones or anticyclones of any reasonable size to develop significantly in low latitudes, with the exception of cyclones in a vertically unstable atmosphere."
Comanche, I was asking about this yesterday, got an identical response.
I am not in any form or fashion an expert on this, or even a buff, but it would seem to me that if you cant get a parcel of air to sufficiently rise, everything else is for not.
I would very much appreciate hearing from those who understand these things far better than I. But I believe there's a reason that 95L continues to look like it does, i.e., not materializing, despite continued suggestions that it's "looking good".
Appreciate you bringing this up as well.