ATL: EMILY - Remnants

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
theweatherwatch

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#1061 Postby theweatherwatch » Sat Jul 30, 2011 9:12 pm

amawea wrote:
theweatherwatch wrote:Updated my Blog again with some initial thoughts on what could become of future Emily's Future track based on a new concept I have been introduced to called TeleConnections. You can read the blog here - http://theweatherlookout.blogspot.com/


The teleconnection idea has been used by Joe Bastardi for several years. He has quoted the inventor of that idea but I can't remember who it was. I know when I subscribed to his Accuweather pro site a few years ago he used that method for some of his long range forecast. 8-)


I had never heard of it until Mark over at HurricaneTrack.com started talking about it in response to 91L. It's something I would like to research more about.
0 likes   

User avatar
Fego
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 767
Age: 65
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 7:58 pm
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#1062 Postby Fego » Sat Jul 30, 2011 9:13 pm

Florida1118 wrote:
StormClouds63 wrote:Structure is there, but convection lacking this evening.

Its D-Min, the convection loss is normal

Where can I get more info about D-Minus and D-Max? What it is and when it ocurrs.
0 likes   
Go Giants! Go Niners! Go Warriors!

User avatar
SouthDadeFish
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2835
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:54 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

#1063 Postby SouthDadeFish » Sat Jul 30, 2011 9:14 pm

Very little convergence going on according to latest CIMSS analysis. No convergence + dry air + diurnal minimum = minimal convection.
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthDadeFish
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2835
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:54 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#1064 Postby SouthDadeFish » Sat Jul 30, 2011 9:17 pm

Fego wrote:
Florida1118 wrote:
StormClouds63 wrote:Structure is there, but convection lacking this evening.

Its D-Min, the convection loss is normal

Where can I get more info about D-Minus and D-Max? What it is and when it ocurrs.


Dirunal minimum occurs at sunset when the atmosphere is at its hottest. As a result warm air evaporated from the ocean has a harder time rising, which limits thunderstorm activity. The opposite occurs at diurnal(nocturnal) maximum, which occurs right before sunrise where the atmosphere is at its coolest. This makes it easier for warm air from the ocean to rise and produce thunderstorms. 91L just went through diurnal minimum, which is at least part of the reason convection is limited at this time.
0 likes   

Florida1118

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#1065 Postby Florida1118 » Sat Jul 30, 2011 9:18 pm

Fego wrote:
Florida1118 wrote:
StormClouds63 wrote:Structure is there, but convection lacking this evening.

Its D-Min, the convection loss is normal

Where can I get more info about D-Minus and D-Max? What it is and when it ocurrs.

You actually asked this on August 10th last year lol

http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?f=42&t=108938
0 likes   

underthwx
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2360
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 2:14 pm
Location: Brazoria County Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#1066 Postby underthwx » Sat Jul 30, 2011 9:18 pm

.I was allowed to join this forum and Ive totally enjoyed it...Im an ametuer(also at spelling ametuer)....I have a ton of respect for what you post here....especially during hurricane days......Im almost afraid to post what I think or feel is going to evolve with a tropical system......but then again thats why I want in.....I love it....kinda feel I know what Im doing here....hope to learn alot from yall.....
Last edited by underthwx on Sat Jul 30, 2011 9:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthDadeFish
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2835
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:54 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

#1067 Postby SouthDadeFish » Sat Jul 30, 2011 9:19 pm

:uarrow: I'm impressed that you knew that lol!
0 likes   

Florida1118

Re:

#1068 Postby Florida1118 » Sat Jul 30, 2011 9:21 pm

SouthDadeFish wrote::uarrow: I'm impressed that you knew that lol!

Its the 3rd or 4th link on google when you look up D-min and D-max... :lol: Only person I'd expect to remember that is Hurakan...
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthDadeFish
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2835
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:54 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

#1069 Postby SouthDadeFish » Sat Jul 30, 2011 9:23 pm

Go ahead and speculate on model runs over 120+ hours out. You'll quickly learn how inaccurate they become. Keep in mind this isn't even a classified system yet.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22979
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion - 8 PM TWO=90%

#1070 Postby wxman57 » Sat Jul 30, 2011 9:27 pm

ROCK wrote:have they ever gone 100% chance before classifying a system...I dont recall...


Yes, but THEY'RE the ones making the call to upgrade. They're basically saying they plan to upgrade on the next advisory time when they go 100%. I would like to see a separate agency determine the classification, someone who's not making the development forecast. That would be interesting, but it'll never happen.

90% doesn't mean it'll be classified by 10pm CDT this evening, just by 10PM Monday evening. Wait for it to slow down tomorrow as it reaches the western periphery of the ridge. That's when convergence will increase and it'll take off.
0 likes   

User avatar
tailgater
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3339
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 9:13 pm
Location: St. Amant La.

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#1071 Postby tailgater » Sat Jul 30, 2011 9:27 pm

underthwx wrote:I think noone is wrong.....I was allowed to join this forum and Ive totally enjoyed it...Im an ametuer(also at spelling ametuer)....I have a ton of respect for what you post here....especially during hurricane days......Im almost afraid to post what I think or feel is going to evolve with a tropical system......but then again thats why I want in.....I love it....kinda feel I know what Im doing here....hope to learn alot from yall.....

Welcome and jump on in, the water is fine. Don't worry we've all eaten a little crow. :cheesy:
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Portastorm
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 9914
Age: 63
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:

Re: Re:

#1072 Postby Portastorm » Sat Jul 30, 2011 9:31 pm

TwisterFanatic wrote:
Weatherfreak000 wrote:I agree with Gatorcane. The models actually were furthest west around this time on yesterday. Since then we have learned two things:


1. A track out to sea is inevitable (Even if this track goes through the Caribbean it will still feel the weakness. Unfortunately that means the islands in that region are the target this time around.

2. This is not a U.S. threat. It is an Island threat.


For anyone in that area I would be deeply concerned. Future Emily has for real potential, IMHO.


I'm not a mod or anything, but it is WAAY to early for posts of certainty like this.


Well, I am a mod and yes ... I've seen a number of posts in this thread that need forecast disclaimers. To suggest that "we" know that 91L won't be a U.S. threat and a track to sea is inevitable is nothing more than one member's speculation. And really ... a forecast.

C'mon folks, for many of you this ain't your first rodeo during tropical season. You should know better by now.

I'm not singling out Weatherfreak000 but using the post as a point of reference.
0 likes   
Any forecasts under my name are to be taken with a grain of salt. Get your best forecasts from the National Weather Service and National Hurricane Center.

User avatar
abajan
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4234
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 5:10 am
Location: Barbados

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion - 8 PM TWO=90%

#1073 Postby abajan » Sat Jul 30, 2011 9:36 pm

wxman57 wrote:
ROCK wrote:have they ever gone 100% chance before classifying a system...I dont recall...


Yes, but THEY'RE the ones making the call to upgrade. They're basically saying they plan to upgrade on the next advisory time when they go 100%. I would like to see a separate agency determine the classification, someone who's not making the development forecast. That would be interesting, but it'll never happen.

90% doesn't mean it'll be classified by 10pm CDT this evening, just by 10PM Monday evening. Wait for it to slow down tomorrow as it reaches the western periphery of the ridge. That's when convergence will increase and it'll take off.

Just to be precise, they don't actually state 100% - but near 100% :)
0 likes   

User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 29113
Age: 73
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Cypress, TX
Contact:

Re: Re:

#1074 Postby vbhoutex » Sat Jul 30, 2011 9:37 pm

Portastorm wrote:
TwisterFanatic wrote:
Weatherfreak000 wrote:I agree with Gatorcane. The models actually were furthest west around this time on yesterday. Since then we have learned two things:


1. A track out to sea is inevitable (Even if this track goes through the Caribbean it will still feel the weakness. Unfortunately that means the islands in that region are the target this time around.

2. This is not a U.S. threat. It is an Island threat.


For anyone in that area I would be deeply concerned. Future Emily has for real potential, IMHO.


I'm not a mod or anything, but it is WAAY to early for posts of certainty like this.


Well, I am a mod and yes ... I've seen a number of posts in this thread that need forecast disclaimers. To suggest that "we" know that 91L won't be a U.S. threat and a track to sea is inevitable is nothing more than one member's speculation. And really ... a forecast.

C'mon folks, for many of you this ain't your first rodeo during tropical season. You should know better by now.

I'm not singling out Weahtherfreak000 but using the post as a point of reference.

As an admin here I back Portastorm 100%. Anyone that has been on this board for any amount of time knows there are no givens in tropical forecasting. Blanket statements and forecasts do need the S2K disclaimer. Please don't make staff do your job and add the disclaimer for you. If we have to continue that warnings and/or suspensions will follow. This board is getting quite busy and will get busier. Let's all work together to make it easy on everyone.
If you have any comments or concerns about this feel free to contact any of our staff by pm.
0 likes   
Skywarn, C.E.R.T.
Please click below to donate to STORM2K to help with the expenses of keeping the site going:
Image

User avatar
wzrgirl1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1325
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 6:44 am
Location: Pembroke Pines, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion - 8 PM TWO=90%

#1075 Postby wzrgirl1 » Sat Jul 30, 2011 9:37 pm

abajan wrote:
wxman57 wrote:
ROCK wrote:have they ever gone 100% chance before classifying a system...I dont recall...


Yes, but THEY'RE the ones making the call to upgrade. They're basically saying they plan to upgrade on the next advisory time when they go 100%. I would like to see a separate agency determine the classification, someone who's not making the development forecast. That would be interesting, but it'll never happen.

90% doesn't mean it'll be classified by 10pm CDT this evening, just by 10PM Monday evening. Wait for it to slow down tomorrow as it reaches the western periphery of the ridge. That's when convergence will increase and it'll take off.

Just to be precise, they don't actually state 100% - but near 100% :)


I guess nothing is 100% except death and taxes huh?
0 likes   

HurricaneWarning92
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 520
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 4:33 pm
Location: Pembroke Pines, S. Florida (Lat: 26.00N, Lon: 80.22W)

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#1076 Postby HurricaneWarning92 » Sat Jul 30, 2011 9:39 pm

wzrgirl1 wrote:http://www.stormpulse.com/hurricane-david-1979

Hmmmm.....


I feel like the models could shift farther west...
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
wzrgirl1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1325
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 6:44 am
Location: Pembroke Pines, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#1077 Postby wzrgirl1 » Sat Jul 30, 2011 9:44 pm

HurricaneWarning92 wrote:
wzrgirl1 wrote:http://www.stormpulse.com/hurricane-david-1979

Hmmmm.....


I feel like the models could shift farther west...


Could be a remote possibility based on the latest trends, or it could shift back east. I think realistically we will no more by Tuesday or Wednesday.


edit: That was "know" not "no"
0 likes   

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#1078 Postby ozonepete » Sat Jul 30, 2011 9:49 pm

Just want to be clear about DMIN and DMAX. I studied this at Penn State. The main reason for stronger thunderstorm intensity at night is that during the day incoming solar radiation heats the tops of the thunderstorms. That makes the difference in temperature between the surface and upper levels smaller - thus weaker thunderstorms. At night, especially late into the night, the lack of incoming solar radiation allows the thunderstorm tops to cool very nicely, and this makes a greater temp difference between the surface and the tops of thunderstorms, encouraging further upward growth in the convection.
Last edited by ozonepete on Sat Jul 30, 2011 9:53 pm, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

HurricaneWarning92
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 520
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 4:33 pm
Location: Pembroke Pines, S. Florida (Lat: 26.00N, Lon: 80.22W)

#1079 Postby HurricaneWarning92 » Sat Jul 30, 2011 9:50 pm

we are still like 5 days out until it would "feel" the weakness. its silly that right off the bat, we say this will not affect the U.S.
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145366
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#1080 Postby cycloneye » Sat Jul 30, 2011 9:51 pm

Can you imagine for a moment if 91L doesn't develop at all after all the hype of the models,having a well defined low,warm waters,not a lot of shear and not tons of dry air,how the forum would turn into? :)
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here


Return to “2011”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests