ATL: NATE - Remnants - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Rockin4NOLA
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 42
Age: 35
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 9:44 pm
Location: New Orleans, LA

Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#461 Postby Rockin4NOLA » Wed Sep 07, 2011 11:07 pm

:uarrow: Somone correct me if I am wrong but on that image do I see two small..for lack of better wording..."areas of circulation" behind TS Maria coming off of Africa? Or is that just normal sea/tidal movement? Sorry I'm not great shakes at photoshop so I can't really point to where I'm looking but maybe someone knows what I mean...
0 likes   
Proud to call New Orleans home. NOLA forever.

User avatar
Ixolib
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2741
Age: 68
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 8:55 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

Re: ATL: NATE - Models

#462 Postby Ixolib » Wed Sep 07, 2011 11:07 pm

Radiogirltx wrote:
LaBreeze wrote:Just curious - what areas are considered NE GOM, Central (North) GOM, and NW GOM? Is there a particular dividing line that most people use on here? I was just wondering - thanks in advance.


I'd like to know too. I posed the same question during the Irene thread, but never noticed a response.


My opinion would be:
NE GOM = Pensacola to Big Bend
EASTERN GOM = Big Bend southward to Key West
CENTRAL GOM = Mississippi and Louisiana
NW GOM = Sabine Pass to Matagorda Bay (maybe Corpus???)
WESTERN GOM = Matagorda Bay southward to Brownsville
SW GOM = Brownsville southward to Veracruz

I suppose one could also use the NHC breakpoints as a point of reference...
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/breakpoints/images/bp_gulf_11.jpg

Of course, we all know what they say about opinions... :lol:
0 likes   
Betsy '65, Camille '69, Frederic '79, Elena '85, Georges '98, Isidore '02, Katrina '05, Isaac '12, Nate '17

clfenwi
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3331
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:54 pm

Re: ATL: NATE - Models

#463 Postby clfenwi » Wed Sep 07, 2011 11:10 pm

00Z GFS 72h

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4225
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: NATE - Models

#464 Postby South Texas Storms » Wed Sep 07, 2011 11:10 pm

Ixolib wrote:
Radiogirltx wrote:
LaBreeze wrote:Just curious - what areas are considered NE GOM, Central (North) GOM, and NW GOM? Is there a particular dividing line that most people use on here? I was just wondering - thanks in advance.


I'd like to know too. I posed the same question during the Irene thread, but never noticed a response.


My opinion would be:
NE GOM = Pensacola to Big Bend
EASTERN GOM = Big Bend southward to Key West
CENTRAL GOM = Mississippi and Louisiana
NW GOM = Sabine Pass to Matagorda Bay (maybe Corpus???)
WESTERN GOM = Matagorda Bay southward to Brownsville
SW GOM = Brownsville southward to Veracruz

I suppose one could also use the NHC breakpoints as a point of reference...
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/breakpoints/images/bp_gulf_11.jpg

Of course, we all know what they say about opinions... :lol:


That sounds about right.
0 likes   

User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4225
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: NATE - Models

#465 Postby South Texas Storms » Wed Sep 07, 2011 11:12 pm

0z GFS is more north than 18z through 75 hours so far. Maybe the Euro and GFS will come together and meet in northern MX on tonight's 0z runs...
0 likes   

clfenwi
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3331
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:54 pm

Re: ATL: NATE - Models

#466 Postby clfenwi » Wed Sep 07, 2011 11:16 pm

00Z GFS 96h

Image
0 likes   

clfenwi
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3331
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:54 pm

Re: ATL: NATE - Models

#467 Postby clfenwi » Wed Sep 07, 2011 11:24 pm

120h

Image
0 likes   

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL: NATE - Models

#468 Postby Wx_Warrior » Wed Sep 07, 2011 11:24 pm

123H

Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
0 likes   

SunnyThoughts
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2263
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 12:42 pm
Location: Pensacola, Florida

#469 Postby SunnyThoughts » Wed Sep 07, 2011 11:25 pm

96 hours and still sitting there spinning and strengthening it looks like.
0 likes   

User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4225
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: NATE - Models

#470 Postby South Texas Storms » Wed Sep 07, 2011 11:25 pm

Big shift north tonight on the 0z GFS. Moved about 100 miles further north than the past few runs.
At 132 hours, looks like it stalled just offshore, near Tampico, MX... TX ridge please break down soon so our good friend Nate can pay us a visit. :wink:
0 likes   

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL: NATE - Models

#471 Postby Wx_Warrior » Wed Sep 07, 2011 11:29 pm

Not enough to get me excited.

132H

Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
0 likes   

User avatar
Rgv20
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2466
Age: 38
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 5:42 pm
Location: Edinburg/McAllen Tx

#472 Postby Rgv20 » Wed Sep 07, 2011 11:29 pm

Looking at the 500mb Pattern it looks like the ECMWF and GFS have been rather consisting on strengthening the Texas Ridge starting around Sunday evening and that should cause Nate to make a left turn..
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

clfenwi
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3331
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:54 pm

Re: ATL: NATE - Models

#473 Postby clfenwi » Wed Sep 07, 2011 11:30 pm

144h and still not inland

Image
0 likes   

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL: NATE - Models

#474 Postby Wx_Warrior » Wed Sep 07, 2011 11:30 pm

144H

Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
0 likes   

User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4225
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: NATE - Models

#475 Postby South Texas Storms » Wed Sep 07, 2011 11:31 pm

If Nate sits out there long enough, is there any signs of the TX ridge weakening in about 7 days?
0 likes   

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL: NATE - Models

#476 Postby Wx_Warrior » Wed Sep 07, 2011 11:32 pm

Ridge holding strong. -removed- should cease. :lol:

150H. inland

Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
0 likes   

User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4225
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: NATE - Models

#477 Postby South Texas Storms » Wed Sep 07, 2011 11:34 pm

Warrior, I'm so freakin desperate for some hope. Please give me some. :(
0 likes   

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL: NATE - Models

#478 Postby Wx_Warrior » Wed Sep 07, 2011 11:37 pm

0z NAM is more helpful for you than 0z GFS
0 likes   

User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4225
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: NATE - Models

#479 Postby South Texas Storms » Wed Sep 07, 2011 11:39 pm

Yep I saw that. 0z Euro better not make my day start awful when I wake up tomorrow morning and look at it...
0 likes   

psyclone
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4762
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:04 pm
Location: palm harbor fl

#480 Postby psyclone » Wed Sep 07, 2011 11:48 pm

it's not at all uncommon for storms approaching this part of the coast to actually lose latitude upon final approach. i wouldn't be surprised if that happened in this case. it is quite rare for systems in this region to make much headway north. the models seem to generally agree that this system will likely maintain that historical precedent. this gfs run seems most reasonable to me as does the official nhc track.
0 likes   


Return to “2011”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests