xtyphooncyclonex wrote:Wonder why it isn't called (super) typhoon. Anyways, 145 kts is forecast and winds are 140 kts!
Lol, you're right, they dropped the "super" in this advisory, it was a STY 6 hours ago.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
xtyphooncyclonex wrote:Wonder why it isn't called (super) typhoon. Anyways, 145 kts is forecast and winds are 140 kts!
Extratropical94 wrote:xtyphooncyclonex wrote:Wonder why it isn't called (super) typhoon. Anyways, 145 kts is forecast and winds are 140 kts!
Lol, you're right, they dropped the "super" in this advisory, it was a STY 6 hours ago.
SouthDadeFish wrote:I would like to point out that Francisco has been getting at least a 7.0 from ADT for over 24 continuous hours. That is very impressive.
CrazyC83 wrote:So how high is the real actual intensity? That ADT analysis supports an intensity of 150 kt.
euro6208 wrote:CrazyC83 wrote:So how high is the real actual intensity? That ADT analysis supports an intensity of 150 kt.
Those are estimates...If recon were to go in, they would probrably find winds of 155 knots and a central pressure of 880mb as pressure in the area is the lowest globally...
Real intensity always lead the satellite estimates in very strong tropical cyclones especially cat'5s...
GCANE wrote:7C core temp - a monster
mrbagyo wrote:still a "violent" cat 5 whilst undergoing eyewall replacement cycle...wow
ozonepete wrote:GCANE wrote:7C core temp - a monster
Wow! You won't see that very often, for sure.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests