ATL: CRISTOBAL - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
hurricanehunter69
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 342
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 5:21 pm
Location: New Orleans

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#281 Postby hurricanehunter69 » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:59 pm

ROCK wrote::uarrow: anti-cyclone aloft....couldnt be any better IMO

good to be back!!

Well I be damned...was wonderin where you were at!
0 likes   

User avatar
CaneCurious
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 160
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: Kenner, LA

#282 Postby CaneCurious » Wed Aug 20, 2014 11:01 pm

Does anyone know when Levi Cowan will post another video update?
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 143881
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re:

#283 Postby cycloneye » Wed Aug 20, 2014 11:02 pm

CaneCurious wrote:Does anyone know when Levi Cowan will post another video update?


He did this video on Wednesday afternoon.

http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/blog/201 ... erception/
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
CaneCurious
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 160
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: Kenner, LA

Re: Re:

#284 Postby CaneCurious » Wed Aug 20, 2014 11:09 pm

cycloneye wrote:
CaneCurious wrote:Does anyone know when Levi Cowan will post another video update?


He did this video on Wednesday afternoon.


Thanks Cycloneye!
0 likes   

User avatar
somethingfunny
ChatStaff
ChatStaff
Posts: 3926
Age: 36
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 10:30 pm
Location: McKinney, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#285 Postby somethingfunny » Wed Aug 20, 2014 11:12 pm

Until now we've had two main camps of models regarding this cyclogenesis - the GFS, UKMET, and ECMWF (among others) were developing 96L very slowly and letting it move westward to the south of the large Caribbean islands until it potentially coalesces as it enters the Gulf, and the CMC, FIM, and HWRF (among others) were developing 96L very quickly and introducing an almost immediate north/northwest motion toward Puerto Rico and Dominican Republic with a strengthening storm which allows for eventual recurvature or a Florida/EastCoast threat.

I've been of the opinion that slow development of 96L was more likely and we'd see most of the other models shifting southwestward towards a Central America or Gulf of Mexico threat, because this sort of elongated monsoon trough in the ITCZ usually takes a while to become focused on one tight circulation center. Levi Cowan's video from yesterday explained this scenario in which the trailing wave catches up to and then slowly merges with the leading wave as the whole disorganized mess slowly develops while crawling westward. Here's a 850mb vorticity analysis from yesterday which shows these two waves - I'm going to post a current vorticity analysis in a moment.

Image

Image

^ Today the satellite trends indicate that we're getting a quick development and northward motion after all, however I'm still not convinced that it's occurring like that and I'm writing a hypothetical analysis just to throw this idea at the wall and see if you guys think it could stick.

What we have here is the wave to the east, the one with the 10/20 NHC probabilities yesterday, is moving west faster than the southwestern lobe and is almost directly north of it now. Weak cyclonic turning in the southern portion may have helped to get the northern lobe spinning more quickly, but this should get the southern portion spinning as well and we could end up with an elongated circulation or perhaps competing circulations. This elongation is reflected in the ASCAT image despite what at first looks like a tight circulation on satellite, and the current vorticity analysis still shows equal vorticity along the entire axis of this now-combined wave.

Image

Image

Once the northern, seemingly dominant portion of this wave moves off to the northwest of the southern portion, what happens? Does it just break free of the ITCZ and leave behind whatever vorticity it didn't absorb? Or does the southern (at that point southeastern) lobe act like a stretched out rubber band and pull that tighter circulation back in towards it? Although it seems like 96L is developing rapidly, it could be about to unravel as it works out where this circulation is actually going to become focused. If that happens, we'll have a broad, messy circulation slowly organizing as it pushes westward, and the computer models would shift toward the Gulf and limit development (if any) until it reaches that area.

Obviously I'm no expert on the dynamical physics of all this, but I'm a little bit suspicious of this developing so quickly, even despite today's model runs mostly agreeing that this is exactly how it's going to happen. This might be my last chance to throw this opinion out there, since 96L might prove me irrevocably wrong by tomorrow. :lol:
0 likes   
I am not a meteorologist, and any posts made by me are not official forecasts or to be interpreted as being intelligent. These posts are just my opinions and are probably silly opinions.

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15446
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

#286 Postby NDG » Wed Aug 20, 2014 11:17 pm

Is starting to get that look of an organizing tropical cyclone.

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthDadeFish
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2835
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:54 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

#287 Postby SouthDadeFish » Wed Aug 20, 2014 11:31 pm

Latest ASCAT pass shows a LLC starting to form:

Image

However, current IR imagery shows cloud tops starting to warm a bit...
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 143881
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#288 Postby cycloneye » Wed Aug 20, 2014 11:32 pm

:uarrow: Still a bit broad.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

floridasun78
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3755
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 10:16 pm
Location: miami fl

#289 Postby floridasun78 » Wed Aug 20, 2014 11:36 pm

hope islands got time get ready look like getting stronger per hour The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
0 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15446
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

#290 Postby NDG » Wed Aug 20, 2014 11:37 pm

:uarrow: But getting better compared to earlier.
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthDadeFish
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2835
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:54 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#291 Postby SouthDadeFish » Wed Aug 20, 2014 11:39 pm

cycloneye wrote::uarrow: Still a bit broad.


Yes, but the pass is missing some data, and that is still a marked improvement from the pass an hour earlier. Starting to see outflow improving in all quadrants on satellite. I think one more convective burst can put this over the top and become a TC.

My forecast: If we get another strong convective burst before sunrise, recon will probably find a TC tomorrow afternoon. If not, then who knows 8-)

To be honest, conditions seem favorable. Not quite sure why the models aren't eager to develop this before it crashes into some mountains...
0 likes   

floridasun78
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3755
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 10:16 pm
Location: miami fl

#292 Postby floridasun78 » Wed Aug 20, 2014 11:39 pm

i bet nhc thinking issue avd at 5am for area could be td by that time
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7349
Age: 44
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#293 Postby Hurricaneman » Wed Aug 20, 2014 11:42 pm

SouthDadeFish wrote:
cycloneye wrote::uarrow: Still a bit broad.


Yes, but the pass is missing some data, and that is still a marked improvement from the pass an hour earlier. Starting to see outflow improving in all quadrants on satellite. I think one more convective burst can put this over the top and become a TC.

My forecast: If we get another strong convective burst before sunrise, recon will probably find a TC tomorrow afternoon. If not, then who knows 8-)

To be honest, conditions seem favorable. Not quite sure why the models aren't eager to develop this before it crashes into some mountains...


could be a case of the models not having a clear cut circulation center to work with yet and could still be working a 2 vort deal which would be almost completely wrong

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10140
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#294 Postby Blown Away » Wed Aug 20, 2014 11:44 pm

Great satellite presentation ATM... But it's hard to discount the GFS/Euro showing very little/if any development for days... Will we see a decline in 96L to be in line with the globals???
0 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05... EYE COMING MY WAY IN 2024…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

User avatar
xtyphooncyclonex
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3857
Age: 23
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:07 am
Location: Cebu City
Contact:

#295 Postby xtyphooncyclonex » Wed Aug 20, 2014 11:52 pm

Impressive. It's FINALLY cranking up. :ggreen: Not surprised to see a hurricane later in the week, and that this would bring the ACE above average (again) as it traverses boiling hot SSTs and unusually high TCHP. And since when has a hurricane made landfall over the area that this may hit?
0 likes   
REMINDER: My opinions that I, or any other NON Pro-Met in this forum, are unofficial. Please do not take my opinions as an official forecast and warning. I am NOT a meteorologist. Following my forecasts blindly may lead to false alarm, danger and risk if official forecasts from agencies are ignored.

User avatar
xtyphooncyclonex
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3857
Age: 23
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:07 am
Location: Cebu City
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#296 Postby xtyphooncyclonex » Wed Aug 20, 2014 11:58 pm

Although, it may trek over some dry air to its east or northeast.
0 likes   
REMINDER: My opinions that I, or any other NON Pro-Met in this forum, are unofficial. Please do not take my opinions as an official forecast and warning. I am NOT a meteorologist. Following my forecasts blindly may lead to false alarm, danger and risk if official forecasts from agencies are ignored.

User avatar
meriland23
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1239
Age: 37
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:29 pm

#297 Postby meriland23 » Wed Aug 20, 2014 11:58 pm

I am curious. Would a stronger storm bring this more westward or does the strength of the storm have little to do with the path of this specific storm?
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
xtyphooncyclonex
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3857
Age: 23
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:07 am
Location: Cebu City
Contact:

Re:

#298 Postby xtyphooncyclonex » Thu Aug 21, 2014 12:01 am

meriland23 wrote:I am curious. Would a stronger storm bring this more westward or does the strength of the storm have little to do with the path of this specific storm?

A met said before that the stronger it is, the more westward it goes. A weaker storm would move faster and move in another direction.
0 likes   
REMINDER: My opinions that I, or any other NON Pro-Met in this forum, are unofficial. Please do not take my opinions as an official forecast and warning. I am NOT a meteorologist. Following my forecasts blindly may lead to false alarm, danger and risk if official forecasts from agencies are ignored.

User avatar
Yellow Evan
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 16058
Age: 26
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
Contact:

Re: Re:

#299 Postby Yellow Evan » Thu Aug 21, 2014 12:03 am

xtyphooncyclonex wrote:
meriland23 wrote:I am curious. Would a stronger storm bring this more westward or does the strength of the storm have little to do with the path of this specific storm?

A met said before that the stronger it is, the more westward it goes. A weaker storm would move faster and move in another direction.


That doesn't make sense to me. The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
0 likes   

User avatar
xtyphooncyclonex
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3857
Age: 23
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:07 am
Location: Cebu City
Contact:

#300 Postby xtyphooncyclonex » Thu Aug 21, 2014 12:14 am

:uarrow: Well, in some cases, like in Hurricane Irene, it doesn't matter. Despite its strength, it had tracked more northward and struck the Northeast US.

But...

Hurricane Hugo in 1989 was a category 5 which moved Westward or WEST-NW, but as it weakened it shifted its course towards the Carolinas. Which that may be a proof that the statement of the pro met was right.
Last edited by xtyphooncyclonex on Thu Aug 21, 2014 12:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
REMINDER: My opinions that I, or any other NON Pro-Met in this forum, are unofficial. Please do not take my opinions as an official forecast and warning. I am NOT a meteorologist. Following my forecasts blindly may lead to false alarm, danger and risk if official forecasts from agencies are ignored.


Return to “2014”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 51 guests