wxman57 wrote:Tireman4 wrote:From a Meteorologist whom I respect a ton. Greg Fischel at WRAL in Raleigh, North Carolina posted this on his Facebook page. Again, this is why I like him so much..
A colleague of mine, who I like and highly respect, posted a blog this morning suggesting that conveying levels of uncertainty in a weather forecast only muddies the water, and that when push comes to shove, the meteorologist has to make a call. I guess I have a different take. Why pretend to be certain when you're not? There are many forecast situations that are slam dunks with a very high level of confidence. But, there are some with a very low degree of confidence, and many times these are the situations that have the greatest potential impact. I would think that all of you would want to know how much confidence we have, and what the potential scenarios are. Now for government officials, in my mind, you ALWAYS plan for the worst. Even if there's only a 20% chance of something horrific happening, if you don't plan for it and it happens, you've got big trouble on your hands. What do you think? And you won't hurt my feelings if you disagree with me
I made a presentation at the National Hurricane Conference last year on dealing with uncertainty in the forecasts (with respect to hurricanes). It's important to understand the level of uncertainty but also to understand that actions must be taken regardless in many cases.
I know. That was not directed at you. It was more to some of the mets in your industry who are soooo sure of everything...I can name a few in the Houston area...
