ATL: HERMINE - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
wflamholtz
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 30
Age: 29
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2016 8:30 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Models

#701 Postby wflamholtz » Sat Aug 20, 2016 6:54 pm

A have a theory on why the GFS runs of the past were producing a different result from the EURO for 99L, and I think it lies in 850 mb vorticity. The GFS of the past had a much healthier 850 vorticity maximum 24-36 hours before interacting with the Greater Antilles, while the EURO has a less healthy, but becoming more consolidated, around the same time frame.

Now this matters when the interaction with land occurs, because a healthier, more consolidated vorticity maximum allows a source for self sufficiency for ascent of air as the system exits into the Bahamas. The GFS still had a decently healthy vorticity maximum, while the EURO does not (obviously). But I think there's a piece missing that people haven't mentioned, and it's evident to me in today's 18z GFS run.

Once the vorticity associated with 99L is in the Bahamas, it starts to interact and get stretched by the vorticity associated with he ghost of Fiona. It is not able to consolidate over the favorable environment near the Bahamas. So the think to watch as 99L approaches the PR, we need to see how organizes it gets, which remains to be seen. The strongest performing models say "not much" but we'll have to wait. A stronger vort maximum on the other side of the land interaction will result in resiliency from the ghost of Fiona.
0 likes   

User avatar
AJC3
Admin
Admin
Posts: 3999
Age: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Ballston Spa, New York
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Models

#702 Postby AJC3 » Sat Aug 20, 2016 6:56 pm

Alyono wrote:
Blown Away wrote:NHC has bigger tool box than Storm2k... They had 12z Euro run prior to the 2pm update and they still increased 5 day to 60%... Gotta think if they are considering the Euro showing very little and potential future 90L blowing up affecting 99L they would begin lowering 99L's percentages at the 8pm update...


um... NHC does not have the EC prior to their 18Z TDO. The EC arrives at the same time for those who PAY for it. It starts coming in maybe 10 minutes prior to 18Z


Moreover, the centers get the data before the WFO's. In fact, the WFO's actually get model data into AWIPS about 5-10 minutes AFTER paying customers.
0 likes   

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Models

#703 Postby Bocadude85 » Sat Aug 20, 2016 7:08 pm

18Z HWRF now showing a significant hurricane at 126 hours....much stronger then the past few runs.

http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/?model=hwrf&region=99L&pkg=mslp_wind&runtime=2016082018&fh=126&xpos=0&ypos=527
1 likes   

User avatar
Kazmit
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2124
Age: 22
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2016 8:49 am
Location: Williamsburg, VA / Bermuda

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Models

#704 Postby Kazmit » Sat Aug 20, 2016 7:21 pm

Bocadude85 wrote:18Z HWRF now showing a significant hurricane at 126 hours....much stronger then the past few runs.

http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/?model=hwrf&region=99L&pkg=mslp_wind&runtime=2016082018&fh=126&xpos=0&ypos=527

All of these runs have been very uncertain, from no development at all, to a raging Cat 5.
0 likes   
Igor 2010, Sandy 2012, Fay 2014, Gonzalo 2014, Joaquin 2015, Nicole 2016, Humberto 2019

I am only a tropical weather enthusiast. My predictions are not official and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5849
Age: 41
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Models

#705 Postby Hammy » Sat Aug 20, 2016 7:26 pm

GFS seems to have finally woken up to the poor environment and dropped development.
0 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Models

#706 Postby Bocadude85 » Sat Aug 20, 2016 7:31 pm

Hammy wrote:GFS seems to have finally woken up to the poor environment and dropped development.


I'm still not ready to jump on the no development bandwagon.
1 likes   

AutoPenalti
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4030
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Models

#707 Postby AutoPenalti » Sat Aug 20, 2016 7:33 pm

Hammy wrote:GFS seems to have finally woken up to the poor environment and dropped development.

No model since 4 days ago are correct if there's not even a centerpoint to start at.
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.


Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)

TCVN
is a weighted averaged

User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15981
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Models

#708 Postby Kingarabian » Sat Aug 20, 2016 7:47 pm

When the GFS and the Euro show no development... then there will likely be no development.
2 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Models

#709 Postby Stormcenter » Sat Aug 20, 2016 7:50 pm

None of the models saw Katrina becoming what she diid this far out,just saying.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5849
Age: 41
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Models

#710 Postby Hammy » Sat Aug 20, 2016 7:51 pm

Stormcenter wrote:None of the models saw Katrina becoming what she diid this far out,just saying.


I would hope the models have vastly improved in eleven years.
3 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

hurricanehunter69
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 343
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 5:21 pm
Location: New Orleans

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Models

#711 Postby hurricanehunter69 » Sat Aug 20, 2016 8:07 pm

Check out the impressive and "improving " signature on (mimic-TPW ). Looking at this, I am not at all surprised with the NHC increasing development chances. As for the GFS backing off....I would chalk that up to too much land interaction. http://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/real-time/m ... /main.html
1 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145336
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Models

#712 Postby cycloneye » Sat Aug 20, 2016 8:11 pm

Very tight.

Image
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Models

#713 Postby gatorcane » Sat Aug 20, 2016 8:16 pm

00Z intensity guidance:
Image
Last edited by gatorcane on Sat Aug 20, 2016 8:18 pm, edited 3 times in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
blp
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2840
Age: 46
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:51 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Models

#714 Postby blp » Sat Aug 20, 2016 8:17 pm

hurricanehunter69 wrote:Check out the impressive and "improving " signature on (mimic-TPW ). Looking at this, I am not at all surprised with the NHC increasing development chances. As for the GFS backing off....I would chalk that up to too much land interaction. http://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/real-time/m ... /main.html


That MIMIC signature is very impressive. I saw that yesterday and it is much better today. You can almost see it trying to absorb Fiona pulling moisture in.
1 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Hurrilurker
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 719
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 3:32 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Models

#715 Postby Hurrilurker » Sat Aug 20, 2016 8:18 pm

Looking very much like yet another storm that will get ripped apart by Hispaniola just as it starts to get its act together.
0 likes   

User avatar
PTrackerLA
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5277
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
Location: Lafayette, LA

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Models

#716 Postby PTrackerLA » Sat Aug 20, 2016 8:25 pm

Very impressive signature on the MMIC TPW. Fiona is downright tiny compared to 99L's moisture envelope. This seems to be well represented in the precipitable water output of the GFS so I would assume the models see what we see as well 8-) .

It's also somewhat strange the HWRF shows such a tiny compact system given this large envelope.
1 likes   

User avatar
Kazmit
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2124
Age: 22
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2016 8:49 am
Location: Williamsburg, VA / Bermuda

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Models

#717 Postby Kazmit » Sat Aug 20, 2016 8:31 pm

gatorcane wrote:00Z intensity guidance:
Image

Intensity going back up again...
0 likes   
Igor 2010, Sandy 2012, Fay 2014, Gonzalo 2014, Joaquin 2015, Nicole 2016, Humberto 2019

I am only a tropical weather enthusiast. My predictions are not official and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

WeatherEmperor
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4806
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:54 pm
Location: South Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Models

#718 Postby WeatherEmperor » Sat Aug 20, 2016 8:32 pm

18z Navgem weaker than before. Low/Td above north coast of Hispanola moving WNW
0 likes   

User avatar
blp
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2840
Age: 46
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:51 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Models

#719 Postby blp » Sat Aug 20, 2016 8:34 pm

PTrackerLA wrote:Very impressive signature on the MMIC TPW. Fiona is downright tiny compared to 99L's moisture envelope. This seems to be well represented in the precipitable water output of the GFS so I would assume the models see what we see as well 8-) .

It's also somewhat strange the HWRF shows such a tiny compact system given this large envelope.


You bring up a great point about the size. The models keep the vorticity very small. Don't know why the disconnect here something has to give.
1 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Models

#720 Postby Bocadude85 » Sat Aug 20, 2016 9:09 pm

I was just going through Hurricane Earls model thread and interestingly enough the models showed development for a few days and then dropped development for a few days only to start showing development again, a lot of the same people who are writing 99L off had written 97L off also. Another thing of interest I saw was that the ensembles continued to show development even when the deterministic models had dropped development....just food for thought.
1 likes   


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests