ATL: MATTHEW - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
meriland23
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1239
Age: 37
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:29 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1481 Postby meriland23 » Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:31 pm

sma10 wrote:
meriland23 wrote:
sma10 wrote:Okay. Regarding the 18Z GFS...I don't even know where to begin. Prior to it slamming into NYC at 933mb, it spends 3.5 days lumbering up the coast from the Bahamas at 915-925mb, basically 3 days of Cat 4/5 strength. The storm surge would be unimaginable, the destruction beyond catastrophic.

Will this happen? Not a chance.

But it would make a HELL of a great film.


I am curious as to what makes you so sure it wont happen? Like I would like to know why without a doubt you 'know' it wont.


Well, I may have overstated my case with "not a chance". Obviously, there is no one in the world who knows what will happen with 97L, myself included. Like many on this board, I have seen literally hundreds of modeled catastrophes over the years from 200+ hours out, and they just do not play out as modeled. But this particular one made me chuckle because it is perhaps THE VERY WORST case scenario I have ever personally seen in a model. In fact, it's so outrageous, that it looks like a Hollywood script for the worst disaster ever.

Hey, who knows - maybe this is the one. I suppose there will come a day that NYC will be hit directly by a Category 4 behemoth, that has been driving Category 5 whipped waves for 3 days ahead of it. I would just wait another 5-6 days yet before committing to this solution.



I don't know if it looks like the worst possible disaster in modern history, but doesn't it strike you as a little scary that this is the worst outcome you've ever seen a model produce, out of all the modeled scenarios you've said you ever seen?
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1482 Postby CrazyC83 » Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:31 pm

We're all in play. From San Jose (Costa Rica) to St. John's (Newfoundland).
1 likes   

User avatar
SouthFloridawx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8346
Age: 46
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1483 Postby SouthFloridawx » Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:32 pm

What's the low near the Carolina's?

gatorcane wrote:GFS ensembles continue to trend toward the ECMWF with even more turning WNW into Florida in the Bahamas:

0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1484 Postby gatorcane » Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:33 pm

Animation of the 18Z GFS ensembles from hours 126 to 252, not a trend we want to see here in Florida given what the ECMWF and ensembles are showing.

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1485 Postby ConvergenceZone » Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:37 pm

While I agree with others that this GFS is a one and done model run never to be seen again, it is scary to see the runs inching closer to Florida and the East Coast.
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFLTropics
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4236
Age: 50
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:04 am
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1486 Postby SouthFLTropics » Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:37 pm

FWIW the HWRF is just a 1/2 degree farther north at 96 hours.
0 likes   
Fourth Generation Florida Native

Personal Storm History: David 79, Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22, Milton 24

User avatar
CalmBeforeStorm
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 600
Age: 71
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 7:55 pm
Location: Stuart, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1487 Postby CalmBeforeStorm » Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:38 pm

gatorcane wrote:Animation of the 18Z GFS ensembles from hours 126 to 252, not a trend we want to see here in Florida given what the ECMWF and ensembles are showing.

Image

Interesting that the ensemble models hitting Floridas east coast do so in the same time frame, 240 hours, as the 12z Euro.
0 likes   

sma10
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1710
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 1:13 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1488 Postby sma10 » Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:38 pm

I don't know if it looks like the worst possible disaster in modern history, but doesn't it strike you as a little scary that this is the worst outcome you've ever seen a model produce, out of all the modeled scenarios you've said you ever seen?


Oh, no - make no mistake: this would be the worst disaster in modern history (certainly from a monetary perspective). You couldn't put enough zeroes in the cost. But it's too early to worry.

I live near Miami. Today's Euro put Matthew as a 933mb storm right off the SFl coast. Not worried.

Yet.
0 likes   

User avatar
meriland23
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1239
Age: 37
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:29 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1489 Postby meriland23 » Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:39 pm

Am I the only one that thinks this run is not a fluke?
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
p1nheadlarry
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 672
Age: 33
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2014 2:42 pm
Location: SR County FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1490 Postby p1nheadlarry » Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:40 pm

gatorcane wrote:Animation of the 18Z GFS ensembles from hours 126 to 252, not a trend we want to see here in Florida given what the ECMWF and ensembles are showing.

Image


I'm in favor of a blend of the two models, but I can see this thing going more west. Will have to wait and see where it goes and how much it strengthens I suppose.
0 likes   
--;->#GoNoles--;->.

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1491 Postby CrazyC83 » Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:41 pm

meriland23 wrote:Am I the only one that thinks this run is not a fluke?


If timed as such, it is very reasonable. However, timing will be important at several steps along the way. Also the strength of the initial low will be key (otherwise it gets bogged down in Central America like, say, Ida 2009).

It seems 65°W and 85°W are the goalposts right now.
0 likes   

User avatar
La Sirena
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 307
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 4:02 pm
Location: Formerly of the Keys, back home in East TN

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1492 Postby La Sirena » Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:42 pm

meriland23 wrote:Am I the only one that thinks this run is not a fluke?

I think it is at this time....we're still too far out. The models just don't give us an accurate forecast this far out. If it were 5 days out from that scenario I would worry.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.

User avatar
CalmBeforeStorm
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 600
Age: 71
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 7:55 pm
Location: Stuart, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1493 Postby CalmBeforeStorm » Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:42 pm

meriland23 wrote:Am I the only one that thinks this run is not a fluke?

I see every run as a possibility. It's just that as you go further out in the model time frame the possibilities expand exponentially making each scenario a longer shot of verifying.
0 likes   

User avatar
meriland23
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1239
Age: 37
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:29 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1494 Postby meriland23 » Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:43 pm

Well, I tell ya, I will be here to post updated pictures of the 00z run cause I am intensely curious how the trend will course
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1495 Postby CrazyC83 » Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:44 pm

I do think that if it is to go out to sea, it has to do so by October 5 or so, before the ridge rebuilds and then the trough captures it on October 7 or so.
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFLTropics
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4236
Age: 50
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:04 am
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1496 Postby SouthFLTropics » Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:45 pm

HWRF landfall on Tiburon Peninsula, 2nd run in a row...this time at 114 hours. On a NNW heading.
Last edited by SouthFLTropics on Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
Fourth Generation Florida Native

Personal Storm History: David 79, Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22, Milton 24

User avatar
cjrciadt
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1616
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 1:11 pm
Location: Kissimmee, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1497 Postby cjrciadt » Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:46 pm

meriland23 wrote:Am I the only one that thinks this run is not a fluke?

I hope so too, but I dont want to imagine what Staten Island would endure... If this occurred
0 likes   

User avatar
p1nheadlarry
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 672
Age: 33
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2014 2:42 pm
Location: SR County FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1498 Postby p1nheadlarry » Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:48 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:
meriland23 wrote:Am I the only one that thinks this run is not a fluke?


If timed as such, it is very reasonable. However, timing will be important at several steps along the way. Also the strength of the initial low will be key (otherwise it gets bogged down in Central America like, say, Ida 2009).

It seems 65°W and 85°W are the goalposts right now.


Pretty big net. Net's too big in soccer anyway.
0 likes   
--;->#GoNoles--;->.

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1499 Postby gatorcane » Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:50 pm

18Z GFDL with a CAT 5 SW of Jamaica (Jamaica is upper-right side of screen) turning NW/N. Looks like a buzzsaw :eek:

Image
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1500 Postby CrazyC83 » Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:52 pm

That's at 850mb but would still be a borderline Cat 4/5 probably (130-140 kt).
0 likes   


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests