Dean4Storms wrote:Still looks very tilted with height. The MLC is displaced NNE of what seems to be a suspect LLC but elongated still trying to form. Don't know if NHC can pull the trigger on this quite yet.
I agree.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Dean4Storms wrote:Still looks very tilted with height. The MLC is displaced NNE of what seems to be a suspect LLC but elongated still trying to form. Don't know if NHC can pull the trigger on this quite yet.
cycloneye wrote:12z Best Track:
AL, 97, 2016092812, , BEST, 0, 132N, 598W, 40, 1008, DB
GlennOBX wrote:cycloneye wrote:12z Best Track:
AL, 97, 2016092812, , BEST, 0, 132N, 598W, 40, 1008, DB
Can you "decode" this for the uninitiated? I get the lat and long, but other than that...
GlennOBX wrote:cycloneye wrote:12z Best Track:
AL, 97, 2016092812, , BEST, 0, 132N, 598W, 40, 1008, DB
Can you "decode" this for the uninitiated? I get the lat and long, but other than that...
GlennOBX wrote:cycloneye wrote:12z Best Track:
AL, 97, 2016092812, , BEST, 0, 132N, 598W, 40, 1008, DB
Can you "decode" this for the uninitiated? I get the lat and long, but other than that...
cycloneye wrote:GlennOBX wrote:cycloneye wrote:12z Best Track:
AL, 97, 2016092812, , BEST, 0, 132N, 598W, 40, 1008, DB
Can you "decode" this for the uninitiated? I get the lat and long, but other than that...
The 40 is winds at kts 1008 is the pressure and DB is disturbance.
cycloneye wrote:12z Best Track:
AL, 97, 2016092812, , BEST, 0, 132N, 598W, 40, 1008, DB
alienstorm wrote:Recon not finding any LLC broad and diffuse circulation. Strong winds but pressure still high and no LLC
GCANE wrote:OK, I take back my earlier comment that it is ramping up.
Convection is far removed from the wave axis.
I am going back with the idea that this slips underneath the forecasted Cut-Off Low's Trough.
I'll post something more technical on that idea later today on why I think it will likely miss the recurve and likely RI once it gets past the trough.
GCANE wrote:OK, I take back my earlier comment that it is ramping up.
Convection is far removed from the wave axis.
I am going back with the idea that this slips underneath the forecasted Cut-Off Low's Trough.
I'll post something more technical on that idea later today on why I think it will likely miss the recurve and likely RI once it gets past the trough.
cycloneye wrote:Yikes Peak 10-second Wind: 54 kt at 101°
NDG wrote:cycloneye wrote:Yikes Peak 10-second Wind: 54 kt at 101°
I'm 50/50 with an upgrade even though they have not found a well defined LLC, IMO.
In another words I wouldn't be surprised either way
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests