ATL: MATTHEW - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Michele B
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1114
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2016 8:08 am
Location: SWFL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#9081 Postby Michele B » Thu Oct 06, 2016 4:57 pm

tarheelprogrammer wrote:
davidiowx wrote:What in the world is this guy doing.


https://twitter.com/Deathbymartymar/status/784122375424004096/video/1


Hopefully he is scaring some sense into the ones who are trying to stay. Makes sense to me.


"And your kids will die."

We watched it ! It was a great line, hoping to get people's attention.

It also sounded a little like he was suffering some PTSD from his Katrina reporting....

js
2 likes   
Cleo - 1964, Betsy - 1965, David - 1979, Andrew - 1992, Charlie (Francis, Ivan, Jeanne) - 2004, Irma - 2017, Ian - 2022

ZX12R
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 82
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2016 8:09 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#9082 Postby ZX12R » Thu Oct 06, 2016 4:57 pm

ZX12R wrote:
Madpoodle wrote:
ZX12R wrote:
I contributed late last night while I was drinking. I hope I didn't contribute thousands of dollars.


You did...

  Help support Storm2K!
Help Support Storm2K


Wonderful. At least it wasn't wasted.


By the way. Where is my "S2K Supporter" moniker?
2 likes   

User avatar
1900hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6059
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 12:04 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#9083 Postby 1900hurricane » Thu Oct 06, 2016 4:57 pm

I don't think the inner eyewall is going anywhere within the next twelve hours at least. If anything, it looks like the outer eyewall has lost a little bit of definition while trying to unevenly contract.

Image

Image

Image
0 likes   
Contract Meteorologist. TAMU & MSST. Fiercely authentic, one of a kind. We are all given free will, so choose a life meant to be lived. We are the Masters of our own Stories.
Opinions expressed are mine alone.

Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/

swampgator92

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#9084 Postby swampgator92 » Thu Oct 06, 2016 4:59 pm

I don't think the inner eyewall is going anywhere within the next twelve hours at least. If anything, it looks like the outer eyewall has lost a little bit of definition while trying to unevenly contract.


So do you think the inner eyewall will "win"? The outer eyewall will just contract and fill in the gaps?
0 likes   

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#9085 Postby ozonepete » Thu Oct 06, 2016 4:59 pm

WilmingtonSandbar wrote:So, someone earlier may have brought this up and if so, I apologize. The other day when Nicole formed, it was stated quite vehemently that she was not strong enough to effect the ridging ahead of Matthew. Now that she is a hurricane, is she strong enough?


It's not just strength. It's size. Nicole is a lot smaller than Matthew. So it's no surprise that no models show Nicole "pumping up the ridge." And btw, "pumping up the ridge" is way overblown on this site. It is a fairly rare effect of very strong hurricanes, usually when they came from Cape Verde and are recurving around the western edge of the ridge.
2 likes   

SapphireSea
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 430
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 12:13 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#9086 Postby SapphireSea » Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:00 pm

AutoPenalti wrote:Looks like people in SFL are pissed off and have become completely complacent.

Comments like "I did all this for nothing", "I bought all his food" "news always hypes up storms" "I will never believe another news channel again" "next hurricane will be a cat 5 and they will hype it up again and then it gets close and steers away"


And this is the effect that I did not want when they started hyping this up, and I have been vehemently against such language being used. Especially for the zones where it was NOT expected to directly to impact. (Miami-Dade Chances were < 5%). Squalls and bands and tornadic activity can be dangerous, but the expectation should have been set lower with more "precotionary" tones. Staying off the road and getting non-perishable in case of power outage was appropriate. Boarding up and creating a bunker in Dade/Broward was inappropriate and the response is now coming in kind.

That being said, the expected zone for landfall/closest approach should still take it seriously.
0 likes   

KC7NEC
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 162
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2016 12:01 am

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#9087 Postby KC7NEC » Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:00 pm

scogor wrote:Friends, I need some advice here. My mother-in-law (almost 90 years old) lives by herself in a home near (but not on) the St. Johns River in Jacksonville. It's a brick home but built well before the Andrew standards. She has refused our pleas to evacuate but now is at the point where she admits that she doesn't want to "inconvenience" us. We live in Sarasota and it takes between 4 and 5 hours to drive to her home. We can leave tonight and pick her up and be back in Sarasota before dawn tomorrow. Will I be able to get gas on the way back and will the weather deteriorate too badly for us to do this?


Areas along the St. Johns are expected to get 9'-11' not INCHES FEET of Storm Surge. You would have to look on the inundation maps to see how close her home is but I would say get her out of there. Even if her house is fine she may be alone in the dark for days or weeks
1 likes   
// Opinions are my own, I am not a Meteorologist. Consult the NHC or Local NWS and Emergency Management for current information in your area. //

ZX12R
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 82
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2016 8:09 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#9088 Postby ZX12R » Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:01 pm

Michele B wrote:
tarheelprogrammer wrote:
davidiowx wrote:What in the world is this guy doing.


https://twitter.com/Deathbymartymar/status/784122375424004096/video/1


Hopefully he is scaring some sense into the ones who are trying to stay. Makes sense to me.


"And your kids will die."

We watched it ! It was a great line, hoping to get people's attention.

It also sounded a little like he was suffering some PTSD from his Katrina reporting....

js


Shep is not right in the head.
1 likes   

bob rulz
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1704
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#9089 Postby bob rulz » Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:02 pm

I was going to say, that inner eyewall still looks strong and healthy to me. I'm not sure what people have been looking at to say otherwise.
1 likes   

WilmingtonSandbar
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 505
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:11 pm
Location: Southport, NC

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#9090 Postby WilmingtonSandbar » Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:03 pm

Has anyone else noted that the 18z GFS run has Matthew staying off the coast until about Georgetown SC, and making the turn farther north than the earlier runs?
0 likes   
Diana X2 (look it up), Bertha, Fran, Bonnie, Floyd, Dennis, Charley, Ophelia, Ernesto, Irene, Matthew, And Florence

User avatar
dhweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Heath, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#9091 Postby dhweather » Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:03 pm

Image

If you extrapolate the last 40 minutes of movement, West Palm Beach would be in the cross hairs. NOT SAYING THIS WILL HAPPEN.

But as the current wobble shows, these things in fact wobble and it is impossible to exactly pinpoint the path or landfall.
2 likes   
The above post and any post by dhweather is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to NWS products.

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20009
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#9092 Postby tolakram » Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:05 pm

saved loop

Image
1 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

SapphireSea
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 430
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 12:13 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#9093 Postby SapphireSea » Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:06 pm

ozonepete wrote:
WilmingtonSandbar wrote:So, someone earlier may have brought this up and if so, I apologize. The other day when Nicole formed, it was stated quite vehemently that she was not strong enough to effect the ridging ahead of Matthew. Now that she is a hurricane, is she strong enough?


It's not just strength. It's size. Nicole is a lot smaller than Matthew. So it's no surprise that no models show Nicole "pumping up the ridge." And btw, "pumping up the ridge" is way overblown on this site. It is a fairly rare effect of very strong hurricanes, usually when they came from Cape Verde and are recurving around the western edge of the ridge.


Thanks for the further clarification on that ozonepete. I believe that most storms can raise 300mb+ heights from what I obserevd. But only the most intense storm's steering is influenced by the change of heights of that layer? I suppose if 850mb-500mb continues to have a trough, a storm would still be influenced by it despite upper ridging becoming better pronunced?
1 likes   

swampgator92

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#9094 Postby swampgator92 » Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:06 pm

Something is clearly happening and FAST the last hour on the radar.

All the "gaps" are filling in and lots of new bands developing.

http://radar.weather.gov/radar.php?rid= ... 1&loop=yes
2 likes   

ZX12R
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 82
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2016 8:09 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#9095 Postby ZX12R » Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:07 pm

bob rulz wrote:I was going to say, that inner eyewall still looks strong and healthy to me. I'm not sure what people have been looking at to say otherwise.


Earlier, at least on radar, the inner wall migrated out close to the secondary, but now seems to be trying to re-establish itself. So, I'm lost now.
0 likes   

User avatar
loon
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 655
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 4:50 pm
Location: Downtown Houston

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#9096 Postby loon » Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:07 pm

wow, the outer eye is contracting so fast on radar.. what is going on?

also, landfall prediction is Melbourne.

-loon
1 likes   

Digital-TC-Chaser

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#9097 Postby Digital-TC-Chaser » Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:08 pm

Image
presentation looks a gnarly cat4ish.
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#9098 Postby Sanibel » Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:08 pm

Lining-up for one well-defined intensification eye over the Gulf Stream prior to landfall?
0 likes   

Michele B
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1114
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2016 8:08 am
Location: SWFL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#9099 Postby Michele B » Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:09 pm

AutoPenalti wrote:WSVN saying Broward has dodge a HUGE bullet.


They have! this thing is as bad as Andrew was....and it tracked far enough north that Broward won't have to experience the eye or anything near it.
1 likes   
Cleo - 1964, Betsy - 1965, David - 1979, Andrew - 1992, Charlie (Francis, Ivan, Jeanne) - 2004, Irma - 2017, Ian - 2022

User avatar
blp
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2840
Age: 46
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:51 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#9100 Postby blp » Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:09 pm

swampgator92 wrote:Something is clearly happening and FAST the last hour on the radar.

All the "gaps" are filling in and lots of new bands developing.

http://radar.weather.gov/radar.php?rid= ... 1&loop=yes


It looks to be bouncing inside the outer eyewall. Just like it went N to NNW earlier it is bouncing the other way now. The outer eyewall is contracting while the inner eye wall is expanding. I think the replacement cycle is underway.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests