ATL: MARIA - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
sikkar
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 326
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 1:44 am
Location: Florida

Re: ATL: MARIA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2121 Postby sikkar » Wed Sep 20, 2017 1:16 am

So do we consider this to be a classic EWRC?
1 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
1900hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6059
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 12:04 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: MARIA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2122 Postby 1900hurricane » Wed Sep 20, 2017 1:21 am

sikkar wrote:So do we consider this to be a classic EWRC?

I would.
0 likes   
Contract Meteorologist. TAMU & MSST. Fiercely authentic, one of a kind. We are all given free will, so choose a life meant to be lived. We are the Masters of our own Stories.
Opinions expressed are mine alone.

Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/

User avatar
Hurrilurker
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 719
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 3:32 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA

Re: ATL: MARIA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2123 Postby Hurrilurker » Wed Sep 20, 2017 1:26 am

That's it, inner eye definitely looks to be collapsing. If this had happened 6 hours ago it would be terrible news for PR, but now, it might be "good".
0 likes   

otowntiger
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1921
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:06 pm

Re: ATL: MARIA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2124 Postby otowntiger » Wed Sep 20, 2017 1:28 am

Aric Dunn wrote:
cheezyWXguy wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:watching some long radar loops.. not much structually has changed in the last 2 hours which is good.. ERC is taking time... good news.


It's taking time, but it's definitely progressing. Seeing more wobbles on radar as it begins to revolve around the outer eye. Also seeing on radar that velocities in the outer, at least aloft, are now higher than the inner in both the NE and SW quadrants. It may not be able to finish the ERC completely by landfall, but it is going to be too close for comfort...not that there's any comfort in a cat4+ hurricane approaching that has just significantly expanded in size


yeah, luckily it really does not look like it will have time to finish and deepen. the inner eyewall needs to collapse before the outer eyewal l can contract anymore. and thus deepen back to cat 5.
unfortunately it won't make much difference at this point. What is about to hit PR will be very bad regardless if it is a strong cat 4 or low end cat 5. It really could just about be the worst case scenario for them at this point.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: MARIA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2125 Postby Aric Dunn » Wed Sep 20, 2017 1:30 am

yeah, the time left for the ERC to complete is over thankfully !

130 to 140 mph right now .. not really enough time to deepen even it the ERC ended right now..

still going to terrible.. but at least its not 175 mph.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

aperson
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 336
Age: 37
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2005 10:56 pm

Re: ATL: MARIA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2126 Postby aperson » Wed Sep 20, 2017 1:31 am

otowntiger wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:
cheezyWXguy wrote:
It's taking time, but it's definitely progressing. Seeing more wobbles on radar as it begins to revolve around the outer eye. Also seeing on radar that velocities in the outer, at least aloft, are now higher than the inner in both the NE and SW quadrants. It may not be able to finish the ERC completely by landfall, but it is going to be too close for comfort...not that there's any comfort in a cat4+ hurricane approaching that has just significantly expanded in size


yeah, luckily it really does not look like it will have time to finish and deepen. the inner eyewall needs to collapse before the outer eyewal l can contract anymore. and thus deepen back to cat 5.
unfortunately it won't make much difference at this point. What is about to hit PR will be very bad regardless if it is a strong cat 4 or low end cat 5. It really could just about be the worst case scenario for them at this point.


It definitely makes a huge difference. NOAA calculates wind speed increase as having an 8th power relationship with monetary damage estimates (source: http://www.srh.noaa.gov/jetstream/tropi ... _wheel.pdf). Structural damage is absolutely not a linear thing.
1 likes   

User avatar
1900hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6059
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 12:04 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: MARIA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2127 Postby 1900hurricane » Wed Sep 20, 2017 1:32 am

Looks like 914 mb (915 mb/16 kt).
1 likes   
Contract Meteorologist. TAMU & MSST. Fiercely authentic, one of a kind. We are all given free will, so choose a life meant to be lived. We are the Masters of our own Stories.
Opinions expressed are mine alone.

Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/

User avatar
1900hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6059
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 12:04 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: MARIA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2128 Postby 1900hurricane » Wed Sep 20, 2017 1:35 am

06Z best track is 140 kt/913 mb.

15L MARIA 170920 0600 17.6N 65.1W ATL 140 913
0 likes   
Contract Meteorologist. TAMU & MSST. Fiercely authentic, one of a kind. We are all given free will, so choose a life meant to be lived. We are the Masters of our own Stories.
Opinions expressed are mine alone.

Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: MARIA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2129 Postby Aric Dunn » Wed Sep 20, 2017 1:36 am

icyclone josh is going to miss the center and maybe brush the eyewall on current course.. he rarely misses.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: MARIA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2130 Postby Aric Dunn » Wed Sep 20, 2017 1:37 am

1900hurricane wrote:06Z best track is 140 kt/913 mb.

15L MARIA 170920 0600 17.6N 65.1W ATL 140 913


recon showing barely 140 mph..
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
Hurrilurker
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 719
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 3:32 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA

Re: ATL: MARIA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2131 Postby Hurrilurker » Wed Sep 20, 2017 1:40 am

Jeez, after beginning to fold inwards on itself, this inner eyewall is stubbornly reforming and holding on. Barely. It's thin and unstable, but it's not dead just yet.
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6108
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: ATL: MARIA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2132 Postby cheezyWXguy » Wed Sep 20, 2017 1:40 am

Aric Dunn wrote:yeah, the time left for the ERC to complete is over thankfully !

130 to 140 mph right now .. not really enough time to deepen even it the ERC ended right now..

still going to terrible.. but at least its not 175 mph.


Curious though: given that Puerto Rico has areas of elevation a couple thousand feet above sea level, portions of the island could experience what is generally considered winds "aloft" which are likely still at cat5 strength, as opposed to the typical surface winds. Could this factor into what NHC will consider Maria's official landfall intensity?
1 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: MARIA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2133 Postby Aric Dunn » Wed Sep 20, 2017 1:41 am

Also a weakeining/ERC landfall has less mixing down of the higher winds normally... not down playing it.. it is still going to be destructive regardless. but at least concrete structures wont blow over.. if well built..
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

shah83
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 302
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2016 4:55 pm

Re: ATL: MARIA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2134 Postby shah83 » Wed Sep 20, 2017 1:42 am

I think this is going to make more of a restrengthening than Odile did before Cabo...
0 likes   

hurricaneCW
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1794
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:20 am
Location: Toms River, NJ

Re: ATL: MARIA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2135 Postby hurricaneCW » Wed Sep 20, 2017 1:44 am

Aric Dunn wrote:Also a weakeining/ERC landfall has less mixing down of the higher winds normally... not down playing it.. it is still going to be destructive regardless. but at least concrete structures wont blow over.. if well built..


This is great news, I think Puerto Rico is going to be just fine and there's still plenty of time for her to weaken further, maybe even to a low-mid Cat 3.
0 likes   

User avatar
Blinhart
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2081
Age: 48
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Crowley, La.

Re: ATL: MARIA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2136 Postby Blinhart » Wed Sep 20, 2017 1:46 am

hurricaneCW wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:Also a weakeining/ERC landfall has less mixing down of the higher winds normally... not down playing it.. it is still going to be destructive regardless. but at least concrete structures wont blow over.. if well built..


This is great news, I think Puerto Rico is going to be just fine and there's still plenty of time for her to weaken further, maybe even to a low-mid Cat 3.


No way will she weaken to a mid Cat 3, she still has about 6 hours to strengthen back up to a Cat 5 if she even weakens down to a Cat 4.

On a major side note, wish I could afford to fly to all these areas that hurricanes are forecast to make landfall to be a chaser, but since I am not a true met or someone that has the actual experience I would probably get myself killed in one of my first tries.
Last edited by Blinhart on Wed Sep 20, 2017 1:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: MARIA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2137 Postby Aric Dunn » Wed Sep 20, 2017 1:46 am

hurricaneCW wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:Also a weakeining/ERC landfall has less mixing down of the higher winds normally... not down playing it.. it is still going to be destructive regardless. but at least concrete structures wont blow over.. if well built..


This is great news, I think Puerto Rico is going to be just fine and there's still plenty of time for her to weaken further, maybe even to a low-mid Cat 3.


no the weakening is done.. its in a steady state really .. if that inner eye collapses it will start to deepen but dont think there is enough time. only a few hours left.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

shawn67
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 143
Age: 58
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 3:03 pm
Location: Fresno, CA

Re: ATL: MARIA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2138 Postby shawn67 » Wed Sep 20, 2017 1:47 am

hurricaneCW wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:Also a weakeining/ERC landfall has less mixing down of the higher winds normally... not down playing it.. it is still going to be destructive regardless. but at least concrete structures wont blow over.. if well built..


This is great news, I think Puerto Rico is going to be just fine and there's still plenty of time for her to weaken further, maybe even to a low-mid Cat 3.

My stomach flips when people make broad declaratory posts like this... :(
2 likes   

hurricaneCW
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1794
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:20 am
Location: Toms River, NJ

Re: ATL: MARIA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2139 Postby hurricaneCW » Wed Sep 20, 2017 1:53 am

shawn67 wrote:
hurricaneCW wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:Also a weakeining/ERC landfall has less mixing down of the higher winds normally... not down playing it.. it is still going to be destructive regardless. but at least concrete structures wont blow over.. if well built..


This is great news, I think Puerto Rico is going to be just fine and there's still plenty of time for her to weaken further, maybe even to a low-mid Cat 3.

My stomach flips when people make broad declaratory posts like this... :(


I think it's important to be optimistic and given recon found winds near 140, it could definitely get down to a 3 if the trend continues. San Juan should see lower winds than at landfall too.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: MARIA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2140 Postby Aric Dunn » Wed Sep 20, 2017 1:53 am

crazy thing is the NHC wont be able to adjust intensity before landfall even though it is no longer a cat 5. post season possibly.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 3 guests