ATL: ALBERTO - Post-Tropical

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
tropicwatch
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3386
Age: 61
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:01 am
Location: Panama City Florida
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#721 Postby tropicwatch » Thu May 24, 2018 2:16 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:
gatorcane wrote:Looks like the LLC might be getting a slight tug to the east (as forecasted by a couple of models)? Shear really ripping into this as the moment:

http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis ... display=12


There are multiple vorts. there is one just offshore moving north.. the one you mentioned is moving S.. there is another north of there moving west. extrapolate to the center of the gyre and its just inland. for now. though the vort right near the coast isnow building convection with it. so it may take over. who knows .. though with the shear more likely is that it will get spit out as well later.


The 850mb vorticity appears to be right where you are talking about and it is not as elongated as it was this morning.

Image
1 likes   
Tropicwatch


Agnes 72', Eloise 75, Elena 85', Kate 85', Charley 86', Florence 88', Beryl 94', Dean 95', Erin 95', Opal 95', Earl 98', Georges 98', Ivan 2004', Arlene 2005', Dennis 2005', Ida 2009' Debby 2012' Irma 2017' Michael 2018'

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Models

#722 Postby Dean4Storms » Thu May 24, 2018 2:18 pm

Crap..... ECM with 80-90mph wind gusts from Gulf Shores to P’Cola.
1 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20009
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Models

#723 Postby tolakram » Thu May 24, 2018 2:21 pm

The NHC has a complete overview of last year, how models performed on track and intensity, and how they performed.

2017 verification report: https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/verification/pdfs/Verification_2017.pdf

So as of the 12Z runs the Euro and GFS have almost exactly the same landfall location with the Euro being a little slower (96 offshore, 120 inland). The euro might be a tad east of the GFS now.

Image

Image
2 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

Ian2401
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 307
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2017 5:55 pm
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#724 Postby Ian2401 » Thu May 24, 2018 2:21 pm

PSUHiker31 wrote:Is anyone else having trouble with satellite loops on NHC site?


Not working for me either
0 likes   
B.S. Meteorology from Florida State '24 // Current M.S. Meteorology student at Florida State

Research Interests: Rapid Intensification, TC Climatology, TC Modeling

Consult the NHC for official information

User avatar
robbielyn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1298
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 9:45 am
Location: brooksville, fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Models

#725 Postby robbielyn » Thu May 24, 2018 2:27 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:
stormlover2013 wrote:Crazy,you think that could happen ?


It's very possible. If the ridge rebuilds, it can't go north. It would either be forced west (and not very fast!) or stall out near the coast or offshore. The ECMWF weakens the ridge just enough to keep it moving inland slowly, but other models largely stall it out in southern LA/MS. A stronger ridge would keep it offshore entirely.

Not too many storms in the Gulf fail to make landfall. But all it would take is a quick burst of shear, since it would be upwelling like crazy if it stalls out. It needs to keep moving to intensify.

That would be the best case scenario. I never witnessed that before.
0 likes   
Robbielyn McCrary
I know just about enough to sound like I know what I'm talking about sometimes. But for your safety please follow the nhc for truly professional forecasting. :D

User avatar
SouthFloridawx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8346
Age: 46
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Models

#726 Postby SouthFloridawx » Thu May 24, 2018 2:29 pm

Wait till later and tomorrow. They will change.
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFloridawx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8346
Age: 46
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#727 Postby SouthFloridawx » Thu May 24, 2018 2:30 pm

This is what I use. I can refresh it as well. It allow up to 50 frames.

https://weather.msfc.nasa.gov/GOES/

Ian2401 wrote:
PSUHiker31 wrote:Is anyone else having trouble with satellite loops on NHC site?

Not working for me either
0 likes   

stormlover2013

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Models

#728 Postby stormlover2013 » Thu May 24, 2018 2:31 pm

well only change i see is more west, the ridge looks mighty strong
1 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Models

#729 Postby gatorcane » Thu May 24, 2018 2:35 pm

12Z UKMET track is the eastern outlier:

Image
0 likes   

BobHarlem
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2109
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:11 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#730 Postby BobHarlem » Thu May 24, 2018 2:38 pm

The decommissioning of the old goes-13 satellite sites has wrecked havoc on a lot of the old standby floaters, etc, NHC and tropical tidbits included.
2 likes   

User avatar
MetroMike
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 952
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 8:13 pm
Location: Tampa Bay
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#731 Postby MetroMike » Thu May 24, 2018 2:40 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:
gatorcane wrote:Looks like the LLC might be getting a slight tug to the east (as forecasted by a couple of models)? Shear really ripping into this as the moment:

http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis ... display=12


There are multiple vorts. there is one just offshore moving north.. the one you mentioned is moving S.. there is another north of there moving west. extrapolate to the center of the gyre and its just inland. for now. though the vort right near the coast isnow building convection with it. so it may take over. who knows .. though with the shear more likely is that it will get spit out as well later.


Yes, we don't even have a main center now. Everyone should know that models do not do verify well until there Is a defined CoC.
1 likes   

LarryWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6306
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 2:04 pm
Location: GA

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#732 Postby LarryWx » Thu May 24, 2018 2:49 pm

I've seen enough. In agreement with the NHC and also based on satellite/model trends, I'm now expecting a TS to form in the GOM along with a TS threat to the US GOM coast early next week from the FL Panhandle westward. I now think there's even a 5% chance for a H hit. If a TS+ landfalls in AL or westward by 5/29, it would become the earliest TS to hit in that part of the US on record back to 1851!
2 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#733 Postby CrazyC83 » Thu May 24, 2018 2:52 pm

LarryWx wrote:I've seen enough. In agreement with the NHC and also based on satellite/model trends, I'm now expecting a TS to form in the GOM along with a TS threat to the US GOM coast early next week from the FL Panhandle westward. I now think there's even a 5% chance for a H hit. If a TS+ landfalls in AL or westward by 5/29, it would become the earliest TS to hit in that part of the US on record back to 1851!


I think reanalysis found an earlier storm to hit in 1957 (more than a month before Audrey in the same area)?
0 likes   

User avatar
SoupBone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3111
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 5:24 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Models

#734 Postby SoupBone » Thu May 24, 2018 2:55 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:
stormlover2013 wrote:Crazy,you think that could happen ?


It's very possible. If the ridge rebuilds, it can't go north. It would either be forced west (and not very fast!) or stall out near the coast or offshore. The ECMWF weakens the ridge just enough to keep it moving inland slowly, but other models largely stall it out in southern LA/MS. A stronger ridge would keep it offshore entirely.

Not too many storms in the Gulf fail to make landfall. But all it would take is a quick burst of shear, since it would be upwelling like crazy if it stalls out. It needs to keep moving to intensify.



I'm not sure this belongs here, and mods, please free to move it, but I'd like to see if you're willing to assign percentages to this possibility? This would be a very interesting discussion, and would be pretty interesting if it unfolded.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

LarryWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6306
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 2:04 pm
Location: GA

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#735 Postby LarryWx » Thu May 24, 2018 2:56 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:
LarryWx wrote:I've seen enough. In agreement with the NHC and also based on satellite/model trends, I'm now expecting a TS to form in the GOM along with a TS threat to the US GOM coast early next week from the FL Panhandle westward. I now think there's even a 5% chance for a H hit. If a TS+ landfalls in AL or westward by 5/29, it would become the earliest TS to hit in that part of the US on record back to 1851!


I think reanalysis found an earlier storm to hit in 1957 (more than a month before Audrey in the same area)?


I'm not aware of this but that's interesting if true. I did find an earlier one than Audrey here though with a June 8th genesis:

http://weather.unisys.com/hurricane/atl ... /track.gif

Is this by any chance that one?
1 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
HeeBGBz
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 341
Age: 70
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 3:25 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion: Breaking News: STWO up to 70%-90%

#736 Postby HeeBGBz » Thu May 24, 2018 3:02 pm

ava_ati wrote:
gatorcane wrote:looks like the models are zoning in on northern Gulf coast for landfall but what we have to watch is as the system makes the NE to NNE to N the NW turn in the Eastern Gulf (a reverse recurve so to speak), just how far east it gets. A center reformation or two to the east could mean a big difference as far as the impacts to the FL peninsula are concerned. It is not like the system is going to just head straight north into the Central GOM from the Yucatan.


Pretty amazing agreement in the models now after being so far apart as recently as yesterday.


All of them seem to be directly over my house. Big rain and Biloxi are not a good combination.
0 likes   

Sciencerocks
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9155
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#737 Postby Sciencerocks » Thu May 24, 2018 3:09 pm

BobHarlem wrote:The decommissioning of the old goes-13 satellite sites has wrecked havoc on a lot of the old standby floaters, etc, NHC and tropical tidbits included.


I don't think the so called upgraded was worth it because of this.

I miss the floaters bad. :(
2 likes   

stormreader

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Models

#738 Postby stormreader » Thu May 24, 2018 3:12 pm

Model guidance in motion from good local La. met Rob Petillo.
https://www.facebook.com/TheRobPerillo/ ... 280574940/
0 likes   

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10163
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#739 Postby SFLcane » Thu May 24, 2018 3:18 pm

Let me introduce you to the best floater page.. :wink:

http://weather.cod.edu/satrad/exper/
4 likes   

Frank2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4061
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:47 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#740 Postby Frank2 » Thu May 24, 2018 3:19 pm

In the 240 nm range of the Key West radar, the western-most echos (closest to the disturbance) have a northward movement of ~ 10 mph...

https://radar.weather.gov/radar.php?pro ... X&loop=yes
0 likes   


Return to “2018”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest