spencer817 wrote:http://i63.tinypic.com/2lc3dwk.jpg![]()
love the FV3 trend, plus i finally figured out how to upload photos! It's a good night!
That 18z run was pretty nice, one close call and 2 other winter wx events.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
spencer817 wrote:http://i63.tinypic.com/2lc3dwk.jpg![]()
love the FV3 trend, plus i finally figured out how to upload photos! It's a good night!
hriverajr wrote:spencer817 wrote:Texas Snow wrote:If its behind a paywall then no but if its something he put on on Twitter or another public forum then yes.
Thanks, I changed it. Not taking any risks, the ECMWF maps are always a murky area.
yep.. those maps are not allowed.. I just read up on it. Otherwise
2.2 You may elect to purchase a Personal Forecaster subscription. An active Personal Forecaster subscription entitles one (1) user (“Personal Forecaster”) to use the Site and its contents and services for the Personal Forecaster’s personal, non-commercial use. A Personal Forecaster may re-publish Site Content on personal, non-commercial websites or social media channels, not to exceed five (5) maps per day, provided that the Personal Forecaster retains (i) identification of the creator of the Content, (ii) any resident copyright notices, (iii) a notice that refers to these Terms and Conditions, (iv) a URL or hyperlink to the page on which the Content is available from WeatherOK, and (v) the Site logo. A Personal Forecaster shall not crop the Content or remove the Site logo from the Content. A Personal Forecaster may download, view, print, and copy the Content and other downloadable items displayed on the Site for personal use only, provided that the Personal Forecaster maintains all copyright and other notices contained therein. Notwithstanding the terms of this Section, all use or sharing of ECMWF maps and content is strictly limited in accordance with Section 2.7.
Ralph's Weather wrote:I remember that miserable stretch. I'll have to look and see what kind.of blocking was in place but inam thinking it was +PNA which ruined it.TeamPlayersBlue wrote:dhweather wrote:
Always a possibility with these situations.
It's possible. If the polar vortex comes to the Ohio river valley, while brutally cold there, we may not get below freezing here in SE Tx. I believe this was the case in Jan 2014.
Cpv17 wrote:
+PNA is what always kills our winters, it seems.
TheProfessor wrote:0z NAM says North Texas folks should keep an eye on this weekend's system. WPC has been discarding the NAM right now, but it does have somewhat of a support from the Ukie and another model I haven't heard of(Thunder model). We'll see.
TheProfessor wrote:0z NAM says North Texas folks should keep an eye on this weekend's system. WPC has been discarding the NAM right now, but it does have somewhat of a support from the Ukie and another model I haven't heard of(Thunder model). We'll see.
Cpv17 wrote:0z NAM digs the trough more and is less progressive with this weekends system.
Ralph's Weather wrote:I remember that miserable stretch. I'll have to look and see what kind.of blocking was in place but inam thinking it was +PNA which ruined it.TeamPlayersBlue wrote:dhweather wrote:
Always a possibility with these situations.
It's possible. If the polar vortex comes to the Ohio river valley, while brutally cold there, we may not get below freezing here in SE Tx. I believe this was the case in Jan 2014.
spencer817 wrote:I certainly wouldn't give up on it, the last 4 runs of the 12z EURO certainly aren't a bad trend:
http://i65.tinypic.com/2ewczk4.gif
Interestingly enough, the first of those runs (with the similar 500 mb height pattern; 12z Jan.12th) had snow for NTX
HockeyTx82 wrote:spencer817 wrote:I certainly wouldn't give up on it, the last 4 runs of the 12z EURO certainly aren't a bad trend:
http://i65.tinypic.com/2ewczk4.gif
Interestingly enough, the first of those runs (with the similar 500 mb height pattern; 12z Jan.12th) had snow for NTX
Ok, finally going to ask, what is this type of map showing? It's one of the few I don't quite understand.
HockeyTx82 wrote:spencer817 wrote:I certainly wouldn't give up on it, the last 4 runs of the 12z EURO certainly aren't a bad trend:
http://i65.tinypic.com/2ewczk4.gif
Interestingly enough, the first of those runs (with the similar 500 mb height pattern; 12z Jan.12th) had snow for NTX
Ok, finally going to ask, what is this type of map showing? It's one of the few I don't quite understand.
Haris wrote:GFS better be wrong. Really losing the steam with the first front. I don't have as much knowledge regarding model biases as others so I'll trust the fact it always does this.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests