ATL: DORIAN - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Hypercane_Kyle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3373
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: ATL: DORIAN - Hurricane - Discussion

#2881 Postby Hypercane_Kyle » Thu Aug 29, 2019 7:06 pm

FYI, HWRF/HMON both showed this storm at ~973mb about this time.
2 likes   
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.

wx98
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1383
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2018 9:24 pm

Re: ATL: DORIAN - Hurricane - Discussion

#2882 Postby wx98 » Thu Aug 29, 2019 7:06 pm

shiny-pebble wrote:I wonder if winds will follow with the pressure drop, even with the shear?

Sent from my LG-H700 using Tapatalk

They’re already coming up, so I’d say yes :P
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34043
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: ATL: DORIAN - Hurricane - Discussion

#2883 Postby CrazyC83 » Thu Aug 29, 2019 7:07 pm

Another pass with the AF plane found flagged SFMR winds of 88 kt. The flight level winds are still in the mid-80s. That said, the flagging might be questionable - it's not like we are in shallow water...
1 likes   

Tailspin

Re: ATL: DORIAN - Hurricane - Discussion

#2884 Postby Tailspin » Thu Aug 29, 2019 7:09 pm

0 likes   

User avatar
tropicwatch
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3396
Age: 61
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:01 am
Location: Panama City Florida
Contact:

Re: ATL: DORIAN - Hurricane - Discussion

#2885 Postby tropicwatch » Thu Aug 29, 2019 7:09 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:Another pass with the AF plane found flagged SFMR winds of 88 kt. The flight level winds are still in the mid-80s. That said, the flagging might be questionable - it's not like we are in shallow water...


80Kts at the surface? That would be one hell of an increase.
0 likes   
Tropicwatch


Agnes 72', Eloise 75, Elena 85', Kate 85', Charley 86', Florence 88', Beryl 94', Dean 95', Erin 95', Opal 95', Earl 98', Georges 98', Ivan 2004', Arlene 2005', Dennis 2005', Ida 2009' Debby 2012' Irma 2017' Michael 2018'

User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 16064
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: ATL: DORIAN - Hurricane - Discussion

#2886 Postby Kingarabian » Thu Aug 29, 2019 7:11 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:
brock berlin wrote:
CrazyC83 wrote:Update: NOAA plane extrapolated 973 mb pressure and supports an 80 kt intensity.


So it's weakening, since the wind speed was previously 85? I guess that's good news although it has several days of a good environment ahead of it.


80 kt = 90 mph. That would be a slight wind increase, but a big pressure decrease.

Fortunately the models don't show very high winds despite the low pressure when it makes landfall. High resolution Euro has 80kt 10m winds while the GFS is near 92-95kts. This is sort of reflected on this pass. Maybe 1900Hurricane can explain further.

Disclaimer: The Euro and GFS are probably too low on the wind speed.
Last edited by Kingarabian on Thu Aug 29, 2019 7:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

User avatar
Siker
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 904
Age: 28
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 7:36 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: ATL: DORIAN - Hurricane - Discussion

#2887 Postby Siker » Thu Aug 29, 2019 7:14 pm

Kingarabian wrote:
CrazyC83 wrote:
brock berlin wrote:
So it's weakening, since the wind speed was previously 85? I guess that's good news although it has several days of a good environment ahead of it.


80 kt = 90 mph. That would be a slight wind increase, but a big pressure decrease.

Fortunately the models don't show very high winds despite the low pressure when it makes landfall. High resolution Euro has 80kt 10m winds while the GFS is near 92-95kts. This is sort of reflected on this pass. Maybe 1900Hurricane can explain further.


I have never seen a modeled monster where the global models depicted realistically high winds to go along with it. Central pressure is also a little iffy on them but less far off from reality. Gust products are a little better.
1 likes   

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: DORIAN - Hurricane - Discussion

#2888 Postby ozonepete » Thu Aug 29, 2019 7:14 pm

Kingarabian wrote:Let's see how Dorian evolves with recon inside there, and how it deals with this shear.


Yes but it's notable that the shear has not reached the very strong and symmetric inner core so far. Since the shear area is pretty small in coverage it's possible it won't have much effect after all.
2 likes   

User avatar
Highteeld
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2139
Age: 41
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2018 9:10 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: ATL: DORIAN - Hurricane - Discussion

#2889 Postby Highteeld » Thu Aug 29, 2019 7:16 pm

Siker wrote:
Kingarabian wrote:
CrazyC83 wrote:
80 kt = 90 mph. That would be a slight wind increase, but a big pressure decrease.

Fortunately the models don't show very high winds despite the low pressure when it makes landfall. High resolution Euro has 80kt 10m winds while the GFS is near 92-95kts. This is sort of reflected on this pass. Maybe 1900Hurricane can explain further.


I have never seen a modeled monster where the global models depicted realistically high winds to go along with it. Central pressure is also a little iffy on them but less far off from reality. Gust products are a little better.

This. The GFS modeled Irma at 125 knots with 890 surface pressure
2 likes   
Very useful information on the Dvorak Technique --

https://severe.worldweather.wmo.int/TCF ... kBeven.pdf

psyclone
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4770
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:04 pm
Location: palm harbor fl

Re: ATL: DORIAN - Hurricane - Discussion

#2890 Postby psyclone » Thu Aug 29, 2019 7:17 pm

One would think with such a small core we might not have cashed all of our windspeed tickets from that big pressure drop. That's fairly impressive deepening and we might get some more wind response.
0 likes   

User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 16064
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: ATL: DORIAN - Hurricane - Discussion

#2891 Postby Kingarabian » Thu Aug 29, 2019 7:18 pm

Siker wrote:
Kingarabian wrote:
CrazyC83 wrote:
80 kt = 90 mph. That would be a slight wind increase, but a big pressure decrease.

Fortunately the models don't show very high winds despite the low pressure when it makes landfall. High resolution Euro has 80kt 10m winds while the GFS is near 92-95kts. This is sort of reflected on this pass. Maybe 1900Hurricane can explain further.


I have never seen a modeled monster where the global models depicted realistically high winds to go along with it. Central pressure is also a little iffy on them but less far off from reality. Gust products are a little better.

Yeah I suppose Barry ended up weak so that's why the GFS and Euro 10m wind forecasts verified.
0 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

hohnywx
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 511
Age: 34
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 8:34 pm
Location: Hastings-on-Hudson, NY

Re: ATL: DORIAN - Hurricane - Discussion

#2892 Postby hohnywx » Thu Aug 29, 2019 7:18 pm

panamatropicwatch wrote:
CrazyC83 wrote:Another pass with the AF plane found flagged SFMR winds of 88 kt. The flight level winds are still in the mid-80s. That said, the flagging might be questionable - it's not like we are in shallow water...


80Kts at the surface? That would be one hell of an increase.


Not really. It’s a 5kt increase
1 likes   

User avatar
Kazmit
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2127
Age: 22
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2016 8:49 am
Location: Bermuda

Re: ATL: DORIAN - Hurricane - Discussion

#2893 Postby Kazmit » Thu Aug 29, 2019 7:19 pm

I'm surprised it has strengthened despite the dry air/shear issues. Just imagine what will happen once conditions become more favorable. :eek:
I think slow but steady intensification will be the trend until tomorrow when it should start to really take off.
0 likes   
Igor 2010, Sandy 2012, Fay 2014, Gonzalo 2014, Joaquin 2015, Nicole 2016, Humberto 2019

I am only a tropical weather enthusiast. My predictions are not official and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 16064
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: ATL: DORIAN - Hurricane - Discussion

#2894 Postby Kingarabian » Thu Aug 29, 2019 7:23 pm

We're getting a live view in how that center relocation 2 days ago shifting the track further east, will a big reason why Dorian is going to survive this shear. If the track remained further west, the shear would be directly over the center of the system instead of to the west. And of course avoiding Hispaniola certainly helps.
3 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

brock berlin
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 15
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 4:56 pm
Location: Charleston SC.

Re: ATL: DORIAN - Hurricane - Discussion

#2895 Postby brock berlin » Thu Aug 29, 2019 7:24 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:
brock berlin wrote:
CrazyC83 wrote:Update: NOAA plane extrapolated 973 mb pressure and supports an 80 kt intensity.


So it's weakening, since the wind speed was previously 85? I guess that's good news although it has several days of a good environment ahead of it.


80 kt = 90 mph. That would be a slight wind increase, but a big pressure decrease.


Oh thank you, got my units confused.
0 likes   

User avatar
TheProfessor
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3506
Age: 28
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 10:56 am
Location: Wichita, Kansas

Re: ATL: DORIAN - Hurricane - Discussion

#2896 Postby TheProfessor » Thu Aug 29, 2019 7:28 pm

Interesting that one plane found readings closer to 980mb while the other one found it closer to 973mb.
0 likes   
An alumnus of The Ohio State University.

Your local National Weather Service office is your best source for weather information.

User avatar
JtSmarts
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1437
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2003 1:29 pm
Location: Columbia, South Carolina

Re: ATL: DORIAN - Hurricane - Discussion

#2897 Postby JtSmarts » Thu Aug 29, 2019 7:29 pm

TheProfessor wrote:Interesting that one plane found readings closer to 980mb while the other one found it closer to 973mb.


It seems like for as long as I can remember, the NOAA planes have consistently found lower pressures than the Air Force planes.
1 likes   

SunnyThoughts
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2263
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 12:42 pm
Location: Pensacola, Florida

Re: ATL: DORIAN - Hurricane - Discussion

#2898 Postby SunnyThoughts » Thu Aug 29, 2019 7:29 pm

TheProfessor wrote:Interesting that one plane found readings closer to 980mb while the other one found it closer to 973mb.


I've noticed many times in past years that the NOAA planes find pressures higher than the AF planes. Not sure why...but I have noticed it quite a few times when they are both in storm at the same time.
5 likes   

User avatar
Kazmit
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2127
Age: 22
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2016 8:49 am
Location: Bermuda

Re: ATL: DORIAN - Hurricane - Discussion

#2899 Postby Kazmit » Thu Aug 29, 2019 7:30 pm

TheProfessor wrote:Interesting that one plane found readings closer to 980mb while the other one found it closer to 973mb.

Either way, that's a pretty significant drop since the last update.
0 likes   
Igor 2010, Sandy 2012, Fay 2014, Gonzalo 2014, Joaquin 2015, Nicole 2016, Humberto 2019

I am only a tropical weather enthusiast. My predictions are not official and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15457
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: ATL: DORIAN - Hurricane - Discussion

#2900 Postby NDG » Thu Aug 29, 2019 7:32 pm

TheProfessor wrote:Interesting that one plane found readings closer to 980mb while the other one found it closer to 973mb.


NOAA's recon extrap MSLP are usually not that well calibrated.
2 likes   


Return to “2019”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests