CrazyC83 wrote:I'm guessing they will up it to 60 kt at the next advisory. Probably no higher though.
Do you think it's only jumped up that little amount or is it just NHC being conservative without recon?
Moderator: S2k Moderators
CrazyC83 wrote:I'm guessing they will up it to 60 kt at the next advisory. Probably no higher though.
catskillfire51 wrote:CrazyC83 wrote:I'm guessing they will up it to 60 kt at the next advisory. Probably no higher though.
Do you think it's only jumped up that little amount or is it just NHC being conservative without recon?
Aric Dunn wrote:There is about to a rude awaking in the morning for many and possibly much more serious problem,
They should seriously upgrade right about now..
https://i.ibb.co/D1RvY5S/33333.gif
ronyan wrote:Anyone remember the June 2010 storm called Alex that looked like a cat 4 but was a 2.
Aric Dunn wrote:ronyan wrote:Anyone remember the June 2010 storm called Alex that looked like a cat 4 but was a 2.
Sure do.. and it would have very rapidly become more than a cat 2..
it was undergoing RI when it made landfall and 105 mph I think..
CrazyC83 wrote:Not saying this will happen, but in the same area at the same time of year, Hurricane Celia in 1970 fell from 988 mb to 945 mb in about 14 hours (winds went from 75 kt to 120 kt).
CrazyC83 wrote:Not saying this will happen, but in the same area at the same time of year, Hurricane Celia in 1970 fell from 988 mb to 945 mb in about 14 hours (winds went from 75 kt to 120 kt).
EquusStorm wrote:Already seeing some 70mph velocity bins on Radarscope north of center, but obviously that's going to be at ~18k ft
jasons2k wrote:Well i think it's pretty obvious at this point that the globals will win-out. Landfall south of Corpus. But I think most of us knew that by this morning
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests