
Slight north shifts would change a lot in the medium term.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
cp79 wrote:This could actually end up being a Pacific storm by this time next week.
GeneratorPower wrote:northjaxpro wrote:GeneratorPower wrote:
La Niña will have a significant effect on how this plays out. This isn’t a normal November.
My goodness, you ain't kidding. La Nina is already flexing her muscle. We are having the warmest October on record here.
I like to look at patterns as a guide to what will happen. It's basically persistence forecasting. Why did we have four named storms hit Louisiana/North Gulf Coast this year? Pattern locked in. Why did 4 hurricanes in 45 days strike FL in 2004? Pattern locked in. It *can* change but when you see stuff over and over, you kinda get the feeling it *won't* change. Why does everyone say "Florida Forcefield". Well, when a pattern is locked in you just can't overcome that pattern and it lasts for MONTHS.
I used to live in the Tennessee Valley and sometime in 2007-ish we had an unbelievable heat ridge that spiked temps to 104F+ every single day for weeks. It was horrible. The pattern would. not. break. down. Until it did.
The question is, does the pattern of Northern Gulf Coast hits continue, or is pattern broken?
toad strangler wrote:Camping in C FL through Sunday. Glorious wx at hand. Not trusting a CA buried outcome with this next system. Regardless of multiple models showing this.
aspen wrote:96L/Eta is likely the last chance 2020 will have to produce a Cat 5. The possibility of ECar genesis and several days tracking across the high SSTs and OHC of the Caribbean is concerning, even excluding a likely CA landfall and high flooding potential.
gatorcane wrote:All of the deterministic models are in surprisingly good agreement on the track and take this into Honduras and/or Nicaragua.
Just because we had Zeta defy climatology means this one will too.
supercane4867 wrote:Looking at recent model runs, it seems that Mitch 98 and Beta 05 are potential analogs for upcoming Eta.
Loveweather12 wrote:gatorcane wrote:All of the deterministic models are in surprisingly good agreement on the track and take this into Honduras and/or Nicaragua.
Just because we had Zeta defy climatology means this one will too.
Just because the model is saying it’s going to CA doesn’t mean it will. Things change. We still need to watch & plus, do we have a low to track yet???
Users browsing this forum: ElectricStorm, Google Adsense [Bot], TomballEd and 41 guests