ATL: ETA - Post-Tropical - Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion
If the eye continues to warm and clears out, Dvorak could suffice in absence of recon.
At this rate, though, I wouldn’t be surprised if the Chthulu grabs the next recon flight out of the sky. Or it just gets hit by lightning right as it nears the storm like Willa.
At this rate, though, I wouldn’t be surprised if the Chthulu grabs the next recon flight out of the sky. Or it just gets hit by lightning right as it nears the storm like Willa.
4 likes
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
- HurricaneAndre2008
- Category 1
- Posts: 335
- Age: 27
- Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2019 9:51 pm
- Contact:
Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion
They need to send one out that's not schedule sheesh
5 likes
Cindy(2005), Katrina(2005), Rita(2005), Erin(2007), Isaac(2012)
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1753
- Age: 25
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 11:14 am
- Location: Jupiter, FL
Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion
HurricaneAndre2008 wrote:They need to send one out that's not schedule sheesh
yeah, if they can get one out before 1:30, they need to send it.
2 likes
Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion
HurricaneAndre2008 wrote:We need some new planes, and new training for the pilots to check stuff before they leave. This is becoming too much for this many recons to fail like this
This has to surely be due to funds right? I can't imagine recon into storms has a high priority even in NOAA funding.
3 likes
Andrew (1992), Irene (1999), Frances (2004), Katrina (2005), Wilma (2005), Fay (2008), Irma (2017), Eta (2020), Ian (2022)
Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion
cycloneye wrote:If anyone will stay up in the overnight, the next plane goes at 1:30 AM EST.
The plan says 0130z, which is 8:30 EST? Don’t know where you got 1:30.
4 likes
Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion
This entire situation surrounding Eta is the most '2020' thing of the season. Everything that could go wrong did go wrong both in terms of recon and the RI of Eta.
4 likes
Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion
wx98 wrote:cycloneye wrote:If anyone will stay up in the overnight, the next plane goes at 1:30 AM EST.
The plan says 0130z, which is 8:30 EST? Don’t know where you got 1:30.
Yeah, I think the center fix is at time though.
0 likes
Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion
How is it only a cat 4, it have seem lot off cat 5 not looking any where near as good as this, hope this doesn’t catch anyone off guard, they say it is 130 but to me thinking it most be somewhere near 160 by now
3 likes
Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion
Owasso wrote:wx98 wrote:cycloneye wrote:If anyone will stay up in the overnight, the next plane goes at 1:30 AM EST.
The plan says 0130z, which is 8:30 EST? Don’t know where you got 1:30.
Yeah, I think the center fix is at time though.
Center fix is 0530z, which is 12:30 EST so probably.
0 likes
Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion
I guess I’m staying up all night to see at least one recon pass...assuming recon doesn’t break down again or get eaten by the Kraken halfway to Eta.
11 likes
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion
I'm gonna take a storm2k break for a few hours until recon gets there, it's just too much for me right now. Prayers to CA, I'm afraid the landfall location will be absolutely destroyed.
Last edited by kevin on Mon Nov 02, 2020 4:28 pm, edited 2 times in total.
2 likes
- Hypercane_Kyle
- Category 5
- Posts: 3354
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
- Location: Cape Canaveral, FL
Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion
Eye temps warming again. Looks a little larger as well.
1 likes
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.
Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion
I’ll probably get stoned for saying this but I wonder if they don’t feel that it’s not economically viable to send the aircraft and crew out for a hurricane that is nearly landfalling in a foreign country.
I personally feel that all of the turn backs have been on storms about to make landfall in non US territory.
Rough costing must be upwards of $5000 per hour to run a C130 and crew - so it may just make financial sense to take one flight off the daily plan on non US landfalling storms.
With ETA, of much more importance, is what happens after landfall with regards movement towards the US.
Currently, the only people in the world that would gain anything out of an 8 hour mission, are the data chasers. Everyone else knows that Cat 4/5 Major is about to make landfall around the Nicaragua/Honduras border. That’s all we really need to know for now.
Apologies if that sounds harsh. I live in a non US territory and have seen this for the last couple of years now. I may be wrong, but coming from a background of operating expensive aircraft - I would understand the reasoning to drop certain flights. Perhaps their funding is based on launches - and is why they may launch but then turn around after a certain amount of time.
I’m open to correction and vitriol.
I personally feel that all of the turn backs have been on storms about to make landfall in non US territory.
Rough costing must be upwards of $5000 per hour to run a C130 and crew - so it may just make financial sense to take one flight off the daily plan on non US landfalling storms.
With ETA, of much more importance, is what happens after landfall with regards movement towards the US.
Currently, the only people in the world that would gain anything out of an 8 hour mission, are the data chasers. Everyone else knows that Cat 4/5 Major is about to make landfall around the Nicaragua/Honduras border. That’s all we really need to know for now.
Apologies if that sounds harsh. I live in a non US territory and have seen this for the last couple of years now. I may be wrong, but coming from a background of operating expensive aircraft - I would understand the reasoning to drop certain flights. Perhaps their funding is based on launches - and is why they may launch but then turn around after a certain amount of time.
I’m open to correction and vitriol.
Last edited by Laminar on Mon Nov 02, 2020 4:33 pm, edited 2 times in total.
4 likes
FAA ATP
Belize UAS Operator
Belize UAS Operator
- cycloneye
- Admin
- Posts: 145458
- Age: 68
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion
5 likes
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion
AxaltaRacing24 wrote:HurricaneAndre2008 wrote:They need to send one out that's not schedule sheesh
yeah, if they can get one out before 1:30, they need to send it.
Not as simple as just run out n jump in an airplane. This is air force/government...each flight is carefully planned and executed...it HAS to be, for safety reasons. As much as I would love to see the data, i don't want it to be at the expense of crew safety. The affect on CA from a high cat 4 vs a low cat 5 isn't that relevant
4 likes
- ElectricStorm
- Category 5
- Posts: 5049
- Age: 24
- Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
- Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK
Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion
Even without recon Eta will likely still be upgraded to a Cat 5 operationally if trends continue which I think they likely will. The NHC showed us last year with Lorenzo that their not afraid to ungrade a storm to Cat 5 without recon if they truly think it is. No reason to think they won't do it here, as they still forecast RI through landfall. I personally think Eta already looks better than Lorenzo and it will be even better when the eye clears out. But they're the experts for a reason and it's their call. But yeah they need to send a replacement plane ASAP
Last edited by ElectricStorm on Mon Nov 02, 2020 4:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
4 likes
B.S Meteorology, University of Oklahoma '25
Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.
Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.
- Hypercane_Kyle
- Category 5
- Posts: 3354
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
- Location: Cape Canaveral, FL
Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion
Hurricane Hunters really do need to be better funded to help upkeep with their maintenance. Only 1/4 of the last recons have made it to Zeta.
3 likes
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4030
- Age: 29
- Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
- Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion
Laminar wrote:I’ll probably get stoned for saying this but I wonder if they don’t feel that it’s not economically viable to send the aircraft and crew out for a hurricane that is nearly landfalling in a foreign country.
I personally feel that all of the turn backs have been on storms about to make landfall in non US territory.
Rough costing must be upwards of $5000 per hour to run a C130 and crew - so it may just make financial sense to take one flight off the daily plan on non US landfalling storms.
With ETA, of much more importance, is what happens after landfall with regards movement towards the US.
Currently, the only people in the world that would gain anything out of an 8 hour mission, are the data chasers. Everyone else knows that Cat 4/5 Major is about to make landfall around the Nicaragua/Honduras border. That’s all we really need to know for now.
Apologies if that sounds harsh. I live in a non US territory and have seen this for the last couple of years now. I may be wrong, but coming from a background of operating expensive aircraft - I would understand the reasoning to drop certain flights. Perhaps their funding is based on launches - and is why they may launch but then around after a certain amount of time.
I’m open to correction and vitriol.
If that idea were true, you'd think they would opt to scrub the flight before they are already an hour into the Gulf of Mexico.
9 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.
Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)
TCVN is a weighted averaged
Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion
Can the posters who are constantly posting "How is this not Cat 5 yet?!" or the equivalent please remember that A.You don't have to say the same thing multiple times every hour, B. The NHC are experts for a reason... They aren't sleeping on this... They have more data than any of us do, and C. We all like records and we are all here because we love watching the power of these storms, but "-removed-" can really get in the way of actual information and discussion here.
6 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests