TheStormExpert wrote:12z Track Guidance. TVCN shoots it through the Yucatán Channel.
https://i.imgur.com/BtAwBcz.png
The closest 7 AM CST Closest NHC track to the models is the OFCI & OFCL
Moderator: S2k Moderators
TheStormExpert wrote:12z Track Guidance. TVCN shoots it through the Yucatán Channel.
https://i.imgur.com/BtAwBcz.png
SFLcane wrote:12z Gfs brings this into the upper keys putting SFL into dirty side of what ever develops.
SFLcane wrote:https://i.imgur.com/qmvzSIV.gif
AutoPenalti wrote:SFLcane wrote:https://i.imgur.com/qmvzSIV.gif
What is that? 1-2mb stronger?
gatorcane wrote:Heaviest rainfall offshore and over the Bahamas:
https://i.postimg.cc/6pzmtgpy/gfs-apcpn-seus-20.png
wxman57 wrote:Here's a website (Univ. of Albany) that has track and intensity verification for storms.
Eta: http://www.atmos.albany.edu/facstaff/tang/tcguidance/al292020/
Worst models for track are NGX/NOGAPS and the UKMET.
http://wxman57.com/images/Etatrack.png
HWRF is the big loser for intensity. EC is best at day 4, but only has one verification point.
http://wxman57.com/images/Etaintensity.png
TheStormExpert wrote:SFLcane wrote:https://i.imgur.com/WdPuDEC.gif
The NAVGEM brings a Cat.2 into Palm Beach.
Jr0d wrote:TheStormExpert wrote:SFLcane wrote:https://i.imgur.com/WdPuDEC.gif
The NAVGEM brings a Cat.2 into Palm Beach.
So Palm Beach wont get a direct hit from Eta....j/k sort of....
Tomorrow is ine of the few days I get to sleep in. When I wake up I will either start getting ready, secure loose items, fire up and fuel up the generator and get a few supplies that we dont already have OR not if the evolution of the system keeps it away from the Keys or shows a weak TS that wont be much of a threat.
wxman57 wrote:Here's a website (Univ. of Albany) that has track and intensity verification for storms.
Eta: http://www.atmos.albany.edu/facstaff/tang/tcguidance/al292020/
Worst models for track are NGX/NOGAPS and the UKMET.
http://wxman57.com/images/Etatrack.png
HWRF is the big loser for intensity. EC is best at day 4, but only has one verification point.
http://wxman57.com/images/Etaintensity.png
AutoPenalti wrote:wxman57 wrote:Here's a website (Univ. of Albany) that has track and intensity verification for storms.
Eta: http://www.atmos.albany.edu/facstaff/tang/tcguidance/al292020/
Worst models for track are NGX/NOGAPS and the UKMET.
http://wxman57.com/images/Etatrack.png
HWRF is the big loser for intensity. EC is best at day 4, but only has one verification point.
http://wxman57.com/images/Etaintensity.png
Am I reading this wrong? HWRF seems to be quite the opposite of big loser. It's not the lowest but it's not the highest either..
MJGarrison wrote:AutoPenalti wrote:wxman57 wrote:Here's a website (Univ. of Albany) that has track and intensity verification for storms.
Eta: http://www.atmos.albany.edu/facstaff/tang/tcguidance/al292020/
Worst models for track are NGX/NOGAPS and the UKMET.
http://wxman57.com/images/Etatrack.png
HWRF is the big loser for intensity. EC is best at day 4, but only has one verification point.
http://wxman57.com/images/Etaintensity.png
Am I reading this wrong? HWRF seems to be quite the opposite of big loser. It's not the lowest but it's not the highest either..
Wxman specifically was calling out Day 4
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests