NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Moderators: hurricanetrack, S2k Moderators

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
With such a huge discrepancy in FL and SFMR winds, as well as continued skepticism of SFMR at higher ends... Will the 159 kt SFMR be thrown out completely?
2 likes
- ElectricStorm
- Category 5

- Posts: 5117
- Age: 24
- Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
- Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Eye drop supports 923-924mb, pretty nice drop since last mission
4 likes
B.S Meteorology, University of Oklahoma '25
Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.
Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.
-
PavelGaborik10
- Category 1

- Posts: 460
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2018 3:23 pm
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Data looks to support cat 5 to my eye, granted I'm not professional.
0 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
In my opinion, the latest recon justifies 160mph, but it’s even more shocking to me that they didn’t go with 155.
0 likes
- mrbagyo
- Category 5

- Posts: 3851
- Age: 33
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 9:18 am
- Location: 14.13N 120.98E
- Contact:
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
923-924
145 knots on 06z update?
145 knots on 06z update?
0 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to RSMC, NHC and NWS products.
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Teban54 wrote:With such a huge discrepancy in FL and SFMR winds, as well as continued skepticism of SFMR at higher ends... Will the 159 kt SFMR be thrown out completely?
I think maybe not completely disregarded but maybe weighted less; between the CI# 8.1 ADT, the T7.5 subjective fix that will probably come through at 06z, the FL winds, and the SFMR measurement, there's probably enough support for at least 140kts.
0 likes
-
Chris_in_Tampa
- Category 5

- Posts: 5085
- Age: 42
- Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 11:06 pm
- Location: Tampa, Florida, USA
- Contact:
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Please see the SFMR thread at the end for context. However, the storm is strengthening.
The 2am EDT advisory was posted at 1:57:33am EDT.
At 1:54am EDT an HDOB through the center was posted from recon ending at 1:53:30am EDT.
That ob in the southeast quadrant from where the plane was incoming from to the center had winds of (OB19, ending at 1:53am EDT):
Flight Level Wind (30 sec. Avg.): 155mph
Peak (10 sec. Avg.) Flight Level Wind: 161mph
SFMR Peak (10s Avg.) Sfc. Wind: 170mph
In the northwest quadrant in the ten minutes after that (OB20, ending at 2:03am EDT):
Flight Level Wind (30 sec. Avg.): 161mph
Peak (10 sec. Avg.) Flight Level Wind: 166mph
SFMR Peak (10s Avg.) Sfc. Wind: 183mph
See this thread on Bluesky about SFMR being unreliable from earlier NOAA mission where SFMR was turned off:
https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:ce6exp ... 4fslz5zk2b
Alan Gerard from earlier mission: "Seems as if recon is finding #Melissa potentially intensifying again. Eye dropsonde measured 949 mb with 26 kt of wind at sfc, implying 946-7 mb central pressure. 115 kt SFMR winds in NW quad and 122 kt FL winds in SE quad."
James Franklin: "Alan, unless something has changed recently, the SFMR data aren’t considered properly calibrated. NOAA turned off the transmission of the SFMR but that’s harder to do on the AF C-130s."
Alan Gerard: "Thanks for the update on that. I didn’t know if that was the situation still or not. I will avoid mentioning going forward"
James Franklin: "I haven’t heard anything and I understand the fixes are non-trivial, so yeah, use with caution, especially at the high end."
The 2am EDT advisory was posted at 1:57:33am EDT.
At 1:54am EDT an HDOB through the center was posted from recon ending at 1:53:30am EDT.
That ob in the southeast quadrant from where the plane was incoming from to the center had winds of (OB19, ending at 1:53am EDT):
Flight Level Wind (30 sec. Avg.): 155mph
Peak (10 sec. Avg.) Flight Level Wind: 161mph
SFMR Peak (10s Avg.) Sfc. Wind: 170mph
In the northwest quadrant in the ten minutes after that (OB20, ending at 2:03am EDT):
Flight Level Wind (30 sec. Avg.): 161mph
Peak (10 sec. Avg.) Flight Level Wind: 166mph
SFMR Peak (10s Avg.) Sfc. Wind: 183mph
See this thread on Bluesky about SFMR being unreliable from earlier NOAA mission where SFMR was turned off:
https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:ce6exp ... 4fslz5zk2b
Alan Gerard from earlier mission: "Seems as if recon is finding #Melissa potentially intensifying again. Eye dropsonde measured 949 mb with 26 kt of wind at sfc, implying 946-7 mb central pressure. 115 kt SFMR winds in NW quad and 122 kt FL winds in SE quad."
James Franklin: "Alan, unless something has changed recently, the SFMR data aren’t considered properly calibrated. NOAA turned off the transmission of the SFMR but that’s harder to do on the AF C-130s."
Alan Gerard: "Thanks for the update on that. I didn’t know if that was the situation still or not. I will avoid mentioning going forward"
James Franklin: "I haven’t heard anything and I understand the fixes are non-trivial, so yeah, use with caution, especially at the high end."
3 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Now 144kt flight level winds and 159kt sfmr estimated winds,unrealiable but still useful information.
If eyewall will stays intact another hour or two, I think we may find higher winds in the southwest/northeast eye pass.
Looks like I wont be sleeping anytime soon.
If eyewall will stays intact another hour or two, I think we may find higher winds in the southwest/northeast eye pass.
Looks like I wont be sleeping anytime soon.
Last edited by Jr0d on Mon Oct 27, 2025 1:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
-
CrazyC83
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 34180
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
I'd go with 135 kt for the intensity. Very little weight on the SFMR, but the FL winds and pressure drop support a higher intensity.
3 likes
-
MarioProtVI
- Category 5

- Posts: 1015
- Age: 24
- Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2019 7:33 pm
- Location: New Jersey
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Travorum wrote:Teban54 wrote:With such a huge discrepancy in FL and SFMR winds, as well as continued skepticism of SFMR at higher ends... Will the 159 kt SFMR be thrown out completely?
I think maybe not completely disregarded but maybe weighted less; between the CI# 8.1 ADT, the T7.5 subjective fix that will probably come through at 06z, the FL winds, and the SFMR measurement, there's probably enough support for at least 140kts.
NHC has thrown out SFMRs beginning last year in high end hurricanes because of its faulty issues so they’re only going by the FL->surface reduction method. It doesn’t matter if satellite estimates think it’s a 5, recon weighs much more over that, and recon supports at most 135 kt. Basically this is just Eta 2.0.
0 likes
- ElectricStorm
- Category 5

- Posts: 5117
- Age: 24
- Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
- Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
I also agree with 135kts being a good estimate, and with no double wind max this is well on its way to 140kts+ very soon unless something drastically changes.
1 likes
B.S Meteorology, University of Oklahoma '25
Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.
Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.
- mrbagyo
- Category 5

- Posts: 3851
- Age: 33
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 9:18 am
- Location: 14.13N 120.98E
- Contact:
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
MarioProtVI wrote:Travorum wrote:Teban54 wrote:With such a huge discrepancy in FL and SFMR winds, as well as continued skepticism of SFMR at higher ends... Will the 159 kt SFMR be thrown out completely?
I think maybe not completely disregarded but maybe weighted less; between the CI# 8.1 ADT, the T7.5 subjective fix that will probably come through at 06z, the FL winds, and the SFMR measurement, there's probably enough support for at least 140kts.
NHC has thrown out SFMRs beginning last year in high end hurricanes because of its faulty issues so they’re only going by the FL->surface reduction method. It doesn’t matter if satellite estimates think it’s a 5, recon weighs much more over that, and recon supports at most 135 kt. Basically this is just Eta 2.0.
They badly need to recalibrate the algorithm for the ADT.
1 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to RSMC, NHC and NWS products.
-
CrazyC83
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 34180
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
ElectricStorm wrote:I also agree with 135kts being a good estimate, and with no double wind max this is well on its way to 140kts+ very soon unless something drastically changes.
Pressure is likely around 922 mb from what I could see.
1 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
CrazyC83 wrote:I'd go with 135 kt for the intensity. Very little weight on the SFMR, but the FL winds and pressure drop support a higher intensity.
So would it be correct to assume that it will be category five by morning, as long as there aren’t any additional surprises like an Eyewall replacement cycle.
0 likes
-
CrazyC83
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 34180
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Fancy1002 wrote:CrazyC83 wrote:I'd go with 135 kt for the intensity. Very little weight on the SFMR, but the FL winds and pressure drop support a higher intensity.
So would it be correct to assume that it will be category five by morning, as long as there aren’t any additional surprises like an Eyewall replacement cycle.
Most likely. The pressure seems to be falling again at a good rate.
2 likes
- WaveBreaking
- Category 2

- Posts: 676
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2024 11:33 am
- Location: US
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Eye’s been having some noticeable trochoidal oscillation recently
0 likes
I am NOT a professional meteorologist, so take all of my posts with a grain of salt. My opinions are mine and mine alone.
- cheezyWXguy
- Category 5

- Posts: 6211
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
ElectricStorm wrote:I also agree with 135kts being a good estimate, and with no double wind max this is well on its way to 140kts+ very soon unless something drastically changes.
Since the northern quadrant hasn’t been sampled yet, there’s a chance it already does have 140kt winds.
1 likes
- mrbagyo
- Category 5

- Posts: 3851
- Age: 33
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 9:18 am
- Location: 14.13N 120.98E
- Contact:
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
-90 cloudtops are exploding on the eastern sector of the CDO.
could this be a precursor to EWRC?

could this be a precursor to EWRC?

2 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to RSMC, NHC and NWS products.
-
CrazyC83
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 34180
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
mrbagyo wrote:-90 cloudtops are exploding on the eastern sector of the CDO.
could this be a precursor to EWRC?
https://s12.gifyu.com/images/b3Qu3.gif
Doubtful. It appeared to go through a pseudo-EWRC today and I don't think it has anything concentric?
1 likes
-
CrazyC83
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 34180
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
In general, the SFMR should have little weight around 130 kt and up, and thrown out completely around 150 kt and up. I'd want to see a flight-level wind of at least 150 kt before going cat 5, or a dropsonde suggesting such.
Last edited by CrazyC83 on Mon Oct 27, 2025 1:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
6 likes
Return to “Active Storms/Invests - Atlantic/EastPAC/CentralPAC/MED”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: cycloneye, Shawee, TeamPlayersBlue, tronbunny, USTropics and 330 guests







