NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

Current storms and invests:

Moderators: hurricanetrack, S2k Moderators


The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3646
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1261 Postby Teban54 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 1:10 am

With such a huge discrepancy in FL and SFMR winds, as well as continued skepticism of SFMR at higher ends... Will the 159 kt SFMR be thrown out completely?
2 likes   

User avatar
ElectricStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5117
Age: 24
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1262 Postby ElectricStorm » Mon Oct 27, 2025 1:10 am

Eye drop supports 923-924mb, pretty nice drop since last mission
4 likes   
B.S Meteorology, University of Oklahoma '25

Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.

PavelGaborik10
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 460
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2018 3:23 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1263 Postby PavelGaborik10 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 1:11 am

Data looks to support cat 5 to my eye, granted I'm not professional.
0 likes   

Fancy1002
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 293
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2022 3:47 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1264 Postby Fancy1002 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 1:12 am

In my opinion, the latest recon justifies 160mph, but it’s even more shocking to me that they didn’t go with 155.
0 likes   

User avatar
mrbagyo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3851
Age: 33
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 9:18 am
Location: 14.13N 120.98E
Contact:

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1265 Postby mrbagyo » Mon Oct 27, 2025 1:13 am

923-924
145 knots on 06z update?
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to RSMC, NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Travorum
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 589
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2023 9:36 am
Location: Dunedin, FL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1266 Postby Travorum » Mon Oct 27, 2025 1:13 am

Teban54 wrote:With such a huge discrepancy in FL and SFMR winds, as well as continued skepticism of SFMR at higher ends... Will the 159 kt SFMR be thrown out completely?


I think maybe not completely disregarded but maybe weighted less; between the CI# 8.1 ADT, the T7.5 subjective fix that will probably come through at 06z, the FL winds, and the SFMR measurement, there's probably enough support for at least 140kts.
0 likes   

Chris_in_Tampa
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5085
Age: 42
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 11:06 pm
Location: Tampa, Florida, USA
Contact:

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1267 Postby Chris_in_Tampa » Mon Oct 27, 2025 1:14 am

Please see the SFMR thread at the end for context. However, the storm is strengthening.

The 2am EDT advisory was posted at 1:57:33am EDT.

At 1:54am EDT an HDOB through the center was posted from recon ending at 1:53:30am EDT.

That ob in the southeast quadrant from where the plane was incoming from to the center had winds of (OB19, ending at 1:53am EDT):

Flight Level Wind (30 sec. Avg.): 155mph
Peak (10 sec. Avg.) Flight Level Wind: 161mph
SFMR Peak (10s Avg.) Sfc. Wind: 170mph

In the northwest quadrant in the ten minutes after that (OB20, ending at 2:03am EDT):

Flight Level Wind (30 sec. Avg.): 161mph
Peak (10 sec. Avg.) Flight Level Wind: 166mph
SFMR Peak (10s Avg.) Sfc. Wind: 183mph

See this thread on Bluesky about SFMR being unreliable from earlier NOAA mission where SFMR was turned off:
https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:ce6exp ... 4fslz5zk2b

Alan Gerard from earlier mission: "Seems as if recon is finding #Melissa potentially intensifying again. Eye dropsonde measured 949 mb with 26 kt of wind at sfc, implying 946-7 mb central pressure. 115 kt SFMR winds in NW quad and 122 kt FL winds in SE quad."

‪James Franklin‬: "Alan, unless something has changed recently, the SFMR data aren’t considered properly calibrated. NOAA turned off the transmission of the SFMR but that’s harder to do on the AF C-130s."

‪Alan Gerard‬: "Thanks for the update on that. I didn’t know if that was the situation still or not. I will avoid mentioning going forward"

James Franklin‬: "I haven’t heard anything and I understand the fixes are non-trivial, so yeah, use with caution, especially at the high end."
3 likes   

User avatar
Jr0d
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1454
Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2019 10:52 am
Location: Cayo Hueso

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1268 Postby Jr0d » Mon Oct 27, 2025 1:15 am

Now 144kt flight level winds and 159kt sfmr estimated winds,unrealiable but still useful information.

If eyewall will stays intact another hour or two, I think we may find higher winds in the southwest/northeast eye pass.

Looks like I wont be sleeping anytime soon.
Last edited by Jr0d on Mon Oct 27, 2025 1:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34180
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1269 Postby CrazyC83 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 1:15 am

I'd go with 135 kt for the intensity. Very little weight on the SFMR, but the FL winds and pressure drop support a higher intensity.
3 likes   

MarioProtVI
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1015
Age: 24
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2019 7:33 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1270 Postby MarioProtVI » Mon Oct 27, 2025 1:15 am

Travorum wrote:
Teban54 wrote:With such a huge discrepancy in FL and SFMR winds, as well as continued skepticism of SFMR at higher ends... Will the 159 kt SFMR be thrown out completely?


I think maybe not completely disregarded but maybe weighted less; between the CI# 8.1 ADT, the T7.5 subjective fix that will probably come through at 06z, the FL winds, and the SFMR measurement, there's probably enough support for at least 140kts.

NHC has thrown out SFMRs beginning last year in high end hurricanes because of its faulty issues so they’re only going by the FL->surface reduction method. It doesn’t matter if satellite estimates think it’s a 5, recon weighs much more over that, and recon supports at most 135 kt. Basically this is just Eta 2.0.
0 likes   

User avatar
ElectricStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5117
Age: 24
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1271 Postby ElectricStorm » Mon Oct 27, 2025 1:18 am

I also agree with 135kts being a good estimate, and with no double wind max this is well on its way to 140kts+ very soon unless something drastically changes.
1 likes   
B.S Meteorology, University of Oklahoma '25

Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.

User avatar
mrbagyo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3851
Age: 33
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 9:18 am
Location: 14.13N 120.98E
Contact:

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1272 Postby mrbagyo » Mon Oct 27, 2025 1:18 am

MarioProtVI wrote:
Travorum wrote:
Teban54 wrote:With such a huge discrepancy in FL and SFMR winds, as well as continued skepticism of SFMR at higher ends... Will the 159 kt SFMR be thrown out completely?


I think maybe not completely disregarded but maybe weighted less; between the CI# 8.1 ADT, the T7.5 subjective fix that will probably come through at 06z, the FL winds, and the SFMR measurement, there's probably enough support for at least 140kts.

NHC has thrown out SFMRs beginning last year in high end hurricanes because of its faulty issues so they’re only going by the FL->surface reduction method. It doesn’t matter if satellite estimates think it’s a 5, recon weighs much more over that, and recon supports at most 135 kt. Basically this is just Eta 2.0.


They badly need to recalibrate the algorithm for the ADT.
1 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to RSMC, NHC and NWS products.

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34180
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1273 Postby CrazyC83 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 1:19 am

ElectricStorm wrote:I also agree with 135kts being a good estimate, and with no double wind max this is well on its way to 140kts+ very soon unless something drastically changes.


Pressure is likely around 922 mb from what I could see.
1 likes   

Fancy1002
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 293
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2022 3:47 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1274 Postby Fancy1002 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 1:19 am

CrazyC83 wrote:I'd go with 135 kt for the intensity. Very little weight on the SFMR, but the FL winds and pressure drop support a higher intensity.

So would it be correct to assume that it will be category five by morning, as long as there aren’t any additional surprises like an Eyewall replacement cycle.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34180
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1275 Postby CrazyC83 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 1:20 am

Fancy1002 wrote:
CrazyC83 wrote:I'd go with 135 kt for the intensity. Very little weight on the SFMR, but the FL winds and pressure drop support a higher intensity.

So would it be correct to assume that it will be category five by morning, as long as there aren’t any additional surprises like an Eyewall replacement cycle.


Most likely. The pressure seems to be falling again at a good rate.
2 likes   

User avatar
WaveBreaking
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 676
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2024 11:33 am
Location: US

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1276 Postby WaveBreaking » Mon Oct 27, 2025 1:20 am

Eye’s been having some noticeable trochoidal oscillation recently
0 likes   
I am NOT a professional meteorologist, so take all of my posts with a grain of salt. My opinions are mine and mine alone.

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6211
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1277 Postby cheezyWXguy » Mon Oct 27, 2025 1:23 am

ElectricStorm wrote:I also agree with 135kts being a good estimate, and with no double wind max this is well on its way to 140kts+ very soon unless something drastically changes.

Since the northern quadrant hasn’t been sampled yet, there’s a chance it already does have 140kt winds.
1 likes   

User avatar
mrbagyo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3851
Age: 33
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 9:18 am
Location: 14.13N 120.98E
Contact:

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1278 Postby mrbagyo » Mon Oct 27, 2025 1:24 am

-90 cloudtops are exploding on the eastern sector of the CDO.
could this be a precursor to EWRC?

Image
2 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to RSMC, NHC and NWS products.

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34180
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1279 Postby CrazyC83 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 1:26 am

mrbagyo wrote:-90 cloudtops are exploding on the eastern sector of the CDO.
could this be a precursor to EWRC?

https://s12.gifyu.com/images/b3Qu3.gif


Doubtful. It appeared to go through a pseudo-EWRC today and I don't think it has anything concentric?
1 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34180
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1280 Postby CrazyC83 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 1:29 am

In general, the SFMR should have little weight around 130 kt and up, and thrown out completely around 150 kt and up. I'd want to see a flight-level wind of at least 150 kt before going cat 5, or a dropsonde suggesting such.
Last edited by CrazyC83 on Mon Oct 27, 2025 1:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
6 likes   


Return to “Active Storms/Invests - Atlantic/EastPAC/CentralPAC/MED”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: cycloneye, Shawee, TeamPlayersBlue, tronbunny, USTropics and 330 guests