NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Moderators: hurricanetrack, S2k Moderators

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Based on an analysis of recon data (TDR/HDOBs) and Cuban radar, I estimate that Josh's location in Crawford did see a brief pause in precip, but with gusty mesovortex winds to hurricane force. The location may have had glimpses of the stadium effect at times. His pressure observation won't be directly representative of the landfall intensity - at his distance from the eye, pressures could have been as high as 910mb w/ a 892mb landfall. The gradient was extremely sharp! Pressures above this could suggest some weakening prior to landfall, and pressures 900mb and below would at the very least confirm an 892mb landfall intensity & imply that it may have been stronger. Let's hope he had a barometer set up further west.
8 likes
Kendall -> SLO -> PBC
Memorable Storms: Katrina (for its Florida landfall...) Wilma Matthew Irma
Memorable Storms: Katrina (for its Florida landfall...) Wilma Matthew Irma
- Blown Away
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 10252
- Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Ubuntwo wrote:Based on an analysis of recon data (TDR/HDOBs) and Cuban radar, I estimate that Josh's location in Crawford did see a brief pause in precip, but with gusty mesovortex winds to hurricane force. The location may have had glimpses of the stadium effect at times. His pressure observation won't be directly representative of the landfall intensity - at his distance from the eye, pressures could have been as high as 910mb w/ a 892mb landfall. The gradient was extremely sharp! Pressures above this could suggest some weakening prior to landfall, and pressures 900mb and below would at the very least confirm an 892mb landfall intensity & imply that it may have been stronger. Let's hope he had a barometer set up further west.
Josh M was literally on the E edge of that eyewall. I was hoping he would see the stadium since he documents these storms so amazingly well.
1 likes
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05… Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Nimbus wrote:So you think the gusts being updated and changing every 5 minutes is just for show?
The airport closed this morning and there are internet connection outages all over the island but Weather Underground is usually connected to something.
The airport normally needs to have up to the minute wind speed information for take offs and landings. 5 or 10 mph wrong and you can cause an excursion.
They have a history section for the airport station and the most recent observation is from 5 AM, despite regularly updating "current conditions":

NWS also has direct obs from the airport & the most recent one is from 5 AM as well.
https://forecast.weather.gov/data/obhistory/MKJS.html
I would agree that Wunderground appears to be displaying model outputs. Though I would be surprised if Montego Bay saw conditions exceeding category 2 due to the rapid deterioration we observed.
0 likes
Kendall -> SLO -> PBC
Memorable Storms: Katrina (for its Florida landfall...) Wilma Matthew Irma
Memorable Storms: Katrina (for its Florida landfall...) Wilma Matthew Irma
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Ubuntwo wrote:Based on an analysis of recon data (TDR/HDOBs) and Cuban radar, I estimate that Josh's location in Crawford did see a brief pause in precip, but with gusty mesovortex winds to hurricane force. The location may have had glimpses of the stadium effect at times. His pressure observation won't be directly representative of the landfall intensity - at his distance from the eye, pressures could have been as high as 910mb w/ a 892mb landfall. The gradient was extremely sharp! Pressures above this could suggest some weakening prior to landfall, and pressures 900mb and below would at the very least confirm an 892mb landfall intensity & imply that it may have been stronger. Let's hope he had a barometer set up further west.
Southern shore of west Jamaica is a disaster area now, he must have been caught up helping with search and rescue. Maybe upload some video tonight?
0 likes
-
MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS
- Category 1

- Posts: 489
- Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2020 1:43 pm
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Is that an eye coming out? If the mid-level core survived the mountains and drills down the surface we could be off to the races again.
0 likes
Emily '87, Felix '95, Gert '99, Fabian '03, Humberto '19, Paulette '20, Teddy '20, Fiona '22, Lee '23, Ernesto '24, Humberto/Imelda '25
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Nimbus wrote:Ubuntwo wrote:Based on an analysis of recon data (TDR/HDOBs) and Cuban radar, I estimate that Josh's location in Crawford did see a brief pause in precip, but with gusty mesovortex winds to hurricane force. The location may have had glimpses of the stadium effect at times. His pressure observation won't be directly representative of the landfall intensity - at his distance from the eye, pressures could have been as high as 910mb w/ a 892mb landfall. The gradient was extremely sharp! Pressures above this could suggest some weakening prior to landfall, and pressures 900mb and below would at the very least confirm an 892mb landfall intensity & imply that it may have been stronger. Let's hope he had a barometer set up further west.
Southern shore of west Jamaica is a disaster area now, he must have been caught up helping with search and rescue. Maybe upload some video tonight?
I hope he's alright. The entire parish is without internet/electricity, so he will need to wait on access to Starlink or the like before any uploads. I would concur disaster response is probably his priority at the moment. Crawford saw the RMW for over an hour.
Blown Away wrote:Josh M was literally on the E edge of that eyewall. I was hoping he would see the stadium since he documents these storms so amazingly well.
Crawford was balanced on the razor's edge. +- .5 miles would have made the difference. Parallax, inward slope of the eye, and mesovortex timing makes it really tough to say whether he saw the stadium or not.
1 likes
Kendall -> SLO -> PBC
Memorable Storms: Katrina (for its Florida landfall...) Wilma Matthew Irma
Memorable Storms: Katrina (for its Florida landfall...) Wilma Matthew Irma
- Hurrilurker
- Category 2

- Posts: 738
- Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 3:32 pm
- Location: San Francisco, CA
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Jamaica's terrain really put the clamps on it more than I expected for a relatively short pass, but it looks like it's recovering quickly offshore. Wouldn't be surprised to see it get back down to the 940s.
0 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Ubuntwo wrote:Nimbus wrote:So you think the gusts being updated and changing every 5 minutes is just for show?
The airport closed this morning and there are internet connection outages all over the island but Weather Underground is usually connected to something.
The airport normally needs to have up to the minute wind speed information for take offs and landings. 5 or 10 mph wrong and you can cause an excursion.
They have a history section for the airport station and the most recent observation is from 5 AM, despite regularly updating "current conditions":
https://i.imgur.com/BSPiIyS.png
NWS also has direct obs from the airport & the most recent one is from 5 AM as well.
https://forecast.weather.gov/data/obhistory/MKJS.html
I would agree that Wunderground appears to be displaying model outputs. Though I would be surprised if Montego Bay saw conditions exceeding category 2 due to the rapid deterioration we observed.
Its not model output changing every couple minutes.
Would have to be an elaborate hoax on the part of Weather Underground.
Just changed again and I'm thinking the airport just stopped updating their web page and left their wind speed observations connected to Weather Underground?

Last edited by Nimbus on Tue Oct 28, 2025 6:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
-
MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS
- Category 1

- Posts: 489
- Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2020 1:43 pm
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Nimbus wrote:Ubuntwo wrote:Nimbus wrote:So you think the gusts being updated and changing every 5 minutes is just for show?
The airport closed this morning and there are internet connection outages all over the island but Weather Underground is usually connected to something.
The airport normally needs to have up to the minute wind speed information for take offs and landings. 5 or 10 mph wrong and you can cause an excursion.
They have a history section for the airport station and the most recent observation is from 5 AM, despite regularly updating "current conditions":
https://i.imgur.com/BSPiIyS.png
NWS also has direct obs from the airport & the most recent one is from 5 AM as well.
https://forecast.weather.gov/data/obhistory/MKJS.html
I would agree that Wunderground appears to be displaying model outputs. Though I would be surprised if Montego Bay saw conditions exceeding category 2 due to the rapid deterioration we observed.
Its not model output changing every couple minutes.
Would have to be an elaborate hoax on the part of Weather Underground.
Just changed again and I'm thinking the airport just stopped updating their we page and left their wind speed observations connected to Weather Underground.
https://imgur.com/4YHFT8T
Those huge weather aggregators fake their outputs all the time. Fake radars based on satellite imagery, etc. So much garbage from those sites. If you can’t see the original data, don’t trust it.
3 likes
Emily '87, Felix '95, Gert '99, Fabian '03, Humberto '19, Paulette '20, Teddy '20, Fiona '22, Lee '23, Ernesto '24, Humberto/Imelda '25
- Hurricane2022
- Category 5

- Posts: 1909
- Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
- Location: Araçatuba, Brazil
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
https://x.com/WxNB_/status/1983282541944607176
https://x.com/darin_deveauWX/status/1983183276253872558
https://x.com/darin_deveauWX/status/1983183276253872558
3 likes
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.
--------
ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.
--------
ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).
- InfernoFlameCat
- Category 5

- Posts: 2126
- Age: 22
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2020 10:52 am
- Location: Buford, GA
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Looks like she is off to the races again. Fortunately she doesnt have much time to really intensify.
4 likes
I am by no means a professional. DO NOT look at my forecasts for official information or make decisions based on what I post.
Goal: to become a registered expert over tropical and subtropical cyclones.
Goal: to become a registered expert over tropical and subtropical cyclones.
- Hurricane2022
- Category 5

- Posts: 1909
- Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
- Location: Araçatuba, Brazil
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
InfernoFlameCat wrote:Looks like she is off to the races again. Fortunately she doesnt have much time to really intensify.

7 likes
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.
--------
ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.
--------
ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Melissa's eye does seem to be warming up pretty quickly now, despite the serious deterioration that's been evident from satellite and recon observations.
3 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Looks like the time over land worked as a sort of pseudo EWRC that has given it a much larger eye.
4 likes
Igor 2010, Sandy 2012, Fay 2014, Gonzalo 2014, Joaquin 2015, Nicole 2016, Humberto 2019, Imelda 2025
I am only a tropical weather enthusiast. My predictions are not official and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
I am only a tropical weather enthusiast. My predictions are not official and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
dukeblue219
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 556
- Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:52 pm
- InfernoFlameCat
- Category 5

- Posts: 2126
- Age: 22
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2020 10:52 am
- Location: Buford, GA
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Ok, Melissa is not done yet by any means. I fear she is rapidly intensifying once more.
1 likes
I am by no means a professional. DO NOT look at my forecasts for official information or make decisions based on what I post.
Goal: to become a registered expert over tropical and subtropical cyclones.
Goal: to become a registered expert over tropical and subtropical cyclones.
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Melissa after landfall looking like a "mature" cyclone. The october big eyed storms. Much larger eyewall.
5 likes
Andrew (1992), Irene (1999), Frances (2004), Katrina (2005), Wilma (2005), Fay (2008), Irma (2017), Eta (2020), Ian (2022)
-
CrazyC83
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 34286
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
It also seems to be moving more northeast - that would give it a bit more time over water.
8 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Nuno wrote:Melissa after landfall looking like a "mature" cyclone. The october big eyed storms. Much larger eyewall.
Agreed these have large wind and precipitation fields and so damage is more widespread.
Larger eye hopefully won't go below 940 again NHC still kept her at cat 3 for destructive potential.
Cuba needs to get their final preps done.
At least she is moving faster now so the precip totals will only have hours not days.
0 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
What’s going on with the AF plane? They’re circling at ~5200 gpm, still several hundred miles out from Melissa.
0 likes
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
Return to “Active Storms/Invests - Atlantic/EastPAC/CentralPAC/MED”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 110 guests






