Jeanne likely actually landfalling as cat 2...per NHC

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
Sean in New Orleans
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1794
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 7:26 pm
Location: New Orleans, LA 30.0N 90.0W
Contact:

#61 Postby Sean in New Orleans » Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:57 pm

This thread should be locked, IMO. It's ridiculous, irrelevent, childish, and prudish to be arguing about such a point while this disaster is occurring.
0 likes   

User avatar
yoda
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7874
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 3:51 pm
Location: Springfield VA (20 mins south of DC)
Contact:

#62 Postby yoda » Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:57 pm

DoctorHurricane2003 wrote:This sounds like trolling to me....very very similar to the Ivan is a Cat 2 thread.....we want proof....etc. etc.

The NHC Set Maximum Surface Winds at 100 KT.

100 KT is a category 3.

There is proof through the dropsondes.

There is proof through surface reports.

Gusts don't have to be 20 MPH over a sustained wind....they can be as little as 1 MPH.

Jeanne is a category 3....end of discussion.

I suggest moderators to lock this topic before this becomes even more like the "Ivan is a Cat 2" thread.


I understand... what the real problem here is that EVEN THOUGH THE INTENSITY IS SET AT 100 KTS... the discussion IMPLIES otherwise...

In fact...sfmr and flight level
wind observations at this point do not quite support the 100 kt
intensity estimate...however the aircraft has not yet finished its survey of the Hurricane.

What surface reports may I inquire have CAT 3 sustained?
0 likes   

DoctorHurricane2003

#63 Postby DoctorHurricane2003 » Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:01 pm

*sigh* here we go again with surface reports.

Surface Reports, for the most part, do not necessarily successfully report sustained winds....especially with broken equipment (hey you may be getting a reading that is an hour old) There have been gusts to 122 MPH we know.......which, as I stated before, gusts don't have to be 20 MPH over a sustained wind to be a "gust".
0 likes   

KeyLargoDave
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 423
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 4:03 pm
Location: 25 05' 80 26'
Contact:

#64 Postby KeyLargoDave » Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:01 pm

Less than 30 posts on this board, argumentative, about things that will surely be debated long after landfall, which is what's happening now = TROLL.

Oh, and as I write -- NHC official landafall 120 MPH, Stuart FLA.
0 likes   

Chilly_Water
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 191
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 3:59 pm
Location: Charleston, SC

#65 Postby Chilly_Water » Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:01 pm

Geez, did ANYONE read my post? It's all relative... :D
0 likes   

User avatar
yoda
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7874
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 3:51 pm
Location: Springfield VA (20 mins south of DC)
Contact:

#66 Postby yoda » Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:02 pm

KeyLargoDave wrote:Less than 30 posts on this board, argumentative, about things that will surely be debated long after landfall, which is what's happening now = TROLL.

Oh, and as I write -- NHC official landafall 120 MPH, Stuart FLA.



Link please to what you say? I would like to see that please... :D

No one is a troll on this thread... :roll:
0 likes   

Guest

#67 Postby Guest » Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:02 pm

Max Mayfield said it is a 3
0 likes   

JayPSU
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 7:12 pm

#68 Postby JayPSU » Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:04 pm

KeyLargoDave wrote:Less than 30 posts on this board, argumentative, about things that will surely be debated long after landfall, which is what's happening now = TROLL.

Oh, and as I write -- NHC official landafall 120 MPH, Stuart FLA.


Game, set, match on the Jeanne making landfall as a cat 2.
0 likes   

User avatar
Tri-State_1925
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 341
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 11:16 am
Location: Worcester Hills, MA

#69 Postby Tri-State_1925 » Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:04 pm

I don't think Max Mayfield pushes too much weight on these matters around here for whatever reason...oh man
0 likes   

User avatar
drudd1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 466
Age: 65
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 4:33 am
Location: Chuluota, FL
Contact:

#70 Postby drudd1 » Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:04 pm

I can understand the debate, but as I stated in another thread..........."I dont think us in Florida will care much about the label Jeanne gets, the damage will be with us for a long time to come irregardless."
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

Anonymous

#71 Postby Anonymous » Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:05 pm

Yeah Tri-State...I mean, who listens to the Director of the NHC nowadays? Every member on this board is the authority over tropical weather.
0 likes   

NorthGaWeather

#72 Postby NorthGaWeather » Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:08 pm

WTNT61 KNHC 260359
TCUAT
BULLETIN
HURRICANE JEANNE UPDATE
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
1200 AM EDT SUN SEP 26 2004

AROUND 1150 PM EDT SATURDAY...THE CENTER OF HURRICANE JEANNE MADE
LANDFALL NEAR THE SOUTHERN END OF HUTCHINSON ISLAND JUST EAST OF
STUART FLORIDA...NEAR LATITUDE 27.2 NORTH...LONGITUDE 80.2 WEST.

RECENT OBSERVATIONS FROM THE STEPPED-FREQUENCY MICROWAVE RADIOMETER
INSTRUMENT ONBOARD A NOAA P-3 RESEARCH AIRCRAFT INDICATE THAT
JEANNE WAS A CATEGORY 3 HURRICANE ON THE SAFFIR-SIMPSON HURRICANE
SCALE AT LANDFALL...WITH MAXIMUM WINDS NEAR 120 MPH.

FORECASTER PASCH/FRANKLIN

I rest my case
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

#73 Postby senorpepr » Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:15 pm

NorthGaWeather wrote:WTNT61 KNHC 260359
TCUAT
BULLETIN
HURRICANE JEANNE UPDATE
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
1200 AM EDT SUN SEP 26 2004

AROUND 1150 PM EDT SATURDAY...THE CENTER OF HURRICANE JEANNE MADE
LANDFALL NEAR THE SOUTHERN END OF HUTCHINSON ISLAND JUST EAST OF
STUART FLORIDA...NEAR LATITUDE 27.2 NORTH...LONGITUDE 80.2 WEST.

RECENT OBSERVATIONS FROM THE STEPPED-FREQUENCY MICROWAVE RADIOMETER
INSTRUMENT ONBOARD A NOAA P-3 RESEARCH AIRCRAFT INDICATE THAT
JEANNE WAS A CATEGORY 3 HURRICANE ON THE SAFFIR-SIMPSON HURRICANE
SCALE AT LANDFALL...WITH MAXIMUM WINDS NEAR 120 MPH.

FORECASTER PASCH/FRANKLIN

I rest my case


Great... confirmation. :D Category three.
0 likes   

Lockhart
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 174
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 4:34 am
Location: Miami, FL

#74 Postby Lockhart » Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:24 pm

Indeed, it looks as though the earlier recon was actually undervaluing the winds slightly. So the discussion comment was smart. He didn't think Category 3 was borne out by the data they'd received, but he thought it would be by later data. He was right. The other viewpoint can hardly be called silly (or anything else), considering the NHC discussion writer mentioned that viewpoint as a reasonable possibility.

Let's hope it weakens quickly.
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

#75 Postby senorpepr » Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:26 pm

Lockhart wrote:Indeed, it looks as though the earlier recon was actually undervaluing the winds slightly. So the discussion comment was smart. He didn't think Category 3 was borne out by the data they'd received, but he thought it would be by later data. He was right. The other viewpoint can hardly be called silly (or anything else), considering the NHC discussion writer mentioned that viewpoint as a reasonable possibility.

Let's hope it weakens quickly.


Exactly. That's why I was saying the things I was saying. Data at the time of landfall suggested cat two. However, like you and the NHC mentioned, there was more investigation to complete. Recon did their job and confirmed that Jeanne was a category three with winds of 120mph.

It's all about data.
0 likes   

JTD
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1558
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2003 6:35 pm

#76 Postby JTD » Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:30 pm

BTW, Max Mayfield was on CNN and said "Jeanne is MUCH stronger than Frances" and CNN immediately put his comments onto the bottom of the screen.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: DESTRUCTION5, HurricaneFan, wwizard and 83 guests