Michael Jackson,Will he make a comeback? (Edited)

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
GalvestonDuck
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 15941
Age: 57
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 8:11 am
Location: Galveston, oh Galveston (And yeah, it's a barrier island. Wanna make something of it?)

#461 Postby GalvestonDuck » Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:06 am

It was about 10 years or so ago when he claimed on Oprah's show that he has vitiligo. I think he *could* have it AND uses skin whiteners in addition to mask the patchiness of the disease and even out the skin color. That's the least of his worries.

He doesn't need to be near ANY kids. This is a man who dangled his own son over a balcony.

Eric -- for you. :)

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
j
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4382
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 1:21 pm

#462 Postby j » Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:31 am

Miss Mary wrote:Eric - didn't MJ come out recently stating he NEEDS to be around children? Mary


"NEEDS" is very subjective. To an average adult male or female, They "NEED" sexual gratification.

The very definition of a Pediophile vs a Child Molester are very different. A child molester is not neccesarilly pediophile, and a pediophile is not neccessarily a child molester.

A pedio. is sexually excited by a child. A child molester may or may not be.

I interpret MJ's remark that he "NEEDS' to be around children to mean that he NEEDS the sexual gratification and excitement that they bring to him.

In my eyes, he's a textbook Pediophile, who has the potential to be a Child Molester (as does every Pedio).
0 likes   

User avatar
Lindaloo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 22658
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 10:06 am
Location: Pascagoula, MS

#463 Postby Lindaloo » Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:51 am

Miss Mary wrote:My book too j. I'll always think he's guilty. Same with OJ. Both committed the crimes but both walked. When is life fair?

M.


I just do not believe OJ actually killed them. What I believe is he hired someone to do it. That is the way the prosecutors should have went. That is why the glove did not fit and so forth.

As far as MJ, I know I wanted a guilty verdict from the start. But, after listening to some of the jury statements, the prosecution was flying by the seat of their pants and the defense had their ducks in a row.

One question though, why in the world would MJ actually tell the public that he has small boys in his bedroom? Why would he tell the public that he allows them to have his bed while he sleeps on the floor? What happened to the video evidence they supposedly removed from that secret room at Neverland? Those questions were never answered and if the prosecutor went after him because of that then the United States of America's justice system is in big big trouble!

Since when do we prosecute people in the United States for being weird and a big kid?
0 likes   

User avatar
BUD
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 719
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 8:01 am
Location: N.M.B :SC

#464 Postby BUD » Tue Jun 14, 2005 11:01 am

It must be that the just simply said there was lack of evidence against MJ. Iam not sure if Iam off on this but it seems in Hollywood if you have money and go to trial you will walk!!!!
0 likes   

Miss Mary

#465 Postby Miss Mary » Tue Jun 14, 2005 11:03 am

Shawn - forgot all about the balcony incident.

Linda - I respect your opinions. You seem more fair minded than I feel right now. And of course you have another way of looking at both cases - from a judicial standpoint.

All I know is MJ is weird!

Mary
0 likes   

User avatar
j
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4382
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 1:21 pm

#466 Postby j » Tue Jun 14, 2005 11:05 am

Lindaloo wrote:
Miss Mary wrote:My book too j. I'll always think he's guilty. Same with OJ. Both committed the crimes but both walked. When is life fair?

M.


I just do not believe OJ actually killed them. What I believe is he hired someone to do it. That is the way the prosecutors should have went. That is why the glove did not fit and so forth.



As usual..I agree with you Linda, but not entirely. I too, am of the belief that OJ did not commit the crimes (himself), and that there was probably more than one assailant. Watched the trial from beginning to end.

I think you are giving MJ way too much weirdness slack though.
0 likes   

User avatar
BUD
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 719
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 8:01 am
Location: N.M.B :SC

#467 Postby BUD » Tue Jun 14, 2005 11:09 am

If OJ didnot kill them all by himself how come the police are not looking for someone else????
0 likes   

User avatar
j
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4382
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 1:21 pm

#468 Postby j » Tue Jun 14, 2005 11:11 am

BUD wrote:If OJ didnot kill them all by himself how come the police are not looking for someone else????


Well...that would be because the case is CLOSED!
0 likes   

User avatar
Skywatch_NC
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10949
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 9:31 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC
Contact:

#469 Postby Skywatch_NC » Tue Jun 14, 2005 11:13 am

I've always thought the glove theory was doctored anyway...I'm sure there's ways to make a glove (that used to fit a hand the size of OJ's) to shrink in today's modern technology world.
0 likes   

User avatar
BUD
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 719
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 8:01 am
Location: N.M.B :SC

#470 Postby BUD » Tue Jun 14, 2005 11:21 am

Eventhough the jury didnot convict OJ, he was still sued by her family for other damages.
0 likes   

User avatar
BUD
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 719
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 8:01 am
Location: N.M.B :SC

#471 Postby BUD » Tue Jun 14, 2005 11:27 am

Why does it seem like if you are a celebrity you have money , you can do what ever you want??!! The old saying goes money is the root of all evil??!!
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 146248
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

#472 Postby cycloneye » Tue Jun 14, 2005 12:45 pm

Thanks GD for editing yesterday as I was off-line for more than 24 hours until miday today. :)

Well I said what happened if you look at the first pages of thread.I said all along that the prosecution case was not strong enough and there is the veredict.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
TexasStooge
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 38127
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 1:22 pm
Location: Irving (Dallas County), TX
Contact:

#473 Postby TexasStooge » Tue Jun 14, 2005 2:28 pm

I'm just glad that the case is over.

All I pray is that he REALLY changes his ways.
0 likes   
Weather Enthusiast since 1991.
- Facebook
- Twitter

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 146248
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

#474 Postby cycloneye » Tue Jun 14, 2005 2:39 pm

Could Jacko Make Live 8 Comeback?
Michael Jackson is being lined up for a sensational comeback at next month's Live 8 gig.The King Of Pop has been tentatively invited to appear at the Philadelphia or London gig by organisers, after he was acquitted of child abuse allegations on Monday.Live 8 promoter Harvey Goldsmith says he would consider adding him to the line-up for the July 2 event - but questioned whether he was ready to perform yet.


The above from the drudge report.

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/050614/140/fl3md.html
Last edited by cycloneye on Tue Jun 14, 2005 2:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

BocaGirl66

#475 Postby BocaGirl66 » Tue Jun 14, 2005 2:41 pm

not guilty on all counts...heard the verdict yesterday :)
0 likes   

User avatar
Skywatch_NC
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10949
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 9:31 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC
Contact:

#476 Postby Skywatch_NC » Tue Jun 14, 2005 6:10 pm

Wonder how many will be at his concerts in the future??

Perhaps slightly lower #'s since his trial.
0 likes   

Rainband

#477 Postby Rainband » Tue Jun 14, 2005 6:16 pm

Skywatch_NC wrote:Wonder how many will be at his concerts in the future??

Perhaps slightly lower #'s since his trial.
I think you'd be surprised.
0 likes   

User avatar
Skywatch_NC
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10949
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 9:31 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC
Contact:

#478 Postby Skywatch_NC » Tue Jun 14, 2005 6:18 pm

Rainband wrote:
Skywatch_NC wrote:Wonder how many will be at his concerts in the future??

Perhaps slightly lower #'s since his trial.
I think you'd be surprised.


I know I won't be there. :P
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38120
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#479 Postby Brent » Tue Jun 14, 2005 6:18 pm

:18:

My opinion of him hasn't changed... any parent who wants their child to spend the night with him needs to be locked up themselves!! I know he says he's going to stop, but I bet once he sees young boys he'll be back to his old ways *sigh*

Oh... and I'd rather gouge my eyes out than go see him on tour. He doesn't WANT me to go see him. :lol:
0 likes   
#neversummer

User avatar
streetsoldier
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 9705
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 11:33 pm
Location: Under the rainbow

#480 Postby streetsoldier » Tue Jun 14, 2005 6:25 pm

Now celebrity shyster Mesereau tells the press that Jacko will "NEVER sleep with children again" (???).

RIGHT...close the barn door after the horses are out? :roll:
0 likes   


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests