Frederic1979 wrote:Already bogus run, if you notice it has the high pressure backed way off florida, so we know it starts out with poor initialization.
Comparing the intitialization
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... 0_000l.gif
with the actual 00Z observations,
http://www.spc.noaa.gov/obswx/maps/500_00.pdf (unanalyzed)
http://weather.unisys.com/upper_air/ua_500.html (analyzed)
it looks accurate to me. You can quibble about the 588 line, but that's about all.
At the surface, it may be lacking a 1016 high in the Gulf... I don't have my hands on an unanalyzed plot at the moment, so I don't know if that's valid or if it's a phantom being drawn by the computers in their analysis
(update: looking at the buoy data it looks like a phantom; GFS is correct to not have it)
To the point: I don't see anything glaringly wrong with the initizalization...