INVEST 96L
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- cinlfla
- Category 2
- Posts: 687
- Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 7:16 pm
- Location: Titusville, Florida on the Spacecoast
INVEST 96L
0 likes
- cycloneye
- Admin
- Posts: 146250
- Age: 69
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Here we go again.A good MLC there and as wave moves more west more warmer waters will encounter.
0 likes
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
- Hyperstorm
- Category 5
- Posts: 1500
- Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 3:48 am
- Location: Ocala, FL
Yes, it is definitely getting better organized with time. I can see now the beginnings of a broad area of circulation near the surface with a center somewhere in between 11-12N, 39-41W.
I'm impressed at the continued rate of organization even though its surrounded by the SAL. This probably means that its getting its concentrated energy from the high moisture levels of the ITCZ. Once it moves north of the ITCZ, it shouldn't develop as fast as it is developing currently, until it moves away from the SAL.
There will be problems regarding its development in the future, however. There is currently a trough that is descending from the backside of Irene. The leading edge is just north of 20N and moving south as Irene moves north. This is a very common pattern when tropical cyclones are moving NW around a Bermuda High.
There are two possibilities. First one, that it moves along its weakness and misses the islands. Second one, it continues moving W-WNW and encounters shearing problems as it moves over the islands.
I'm leaning more on the second probability because weak systems tend to continue W/WNW and become sheared when there's a trough nearby. That's not to say that once it moves away from the weakness, it keeps on heading toward the west and strengthens, but as of now, it does NOT look like a major threat towards the islands in terms of hurricane intensity.
Let's see how the different models pick up on this as it is now being called an invest...
I'm impressed at the continued rate of organization even though its surrounded by the SAL. This probably means that its getting its concentrated energy from the high moisture levels of the ITCZ. Once it moves north of the ITCZ, it shouldn't develop as fast as it is developing currently, until it moves away from the SAL.
There will be problems regarding its development in the future, however. There is currently a trough that is descending from the backside of Irene. The leading edge is just north of 20N and moving south as Irene moves north. This is a very common pattern when tropical cyclones are moving NW around a Bermuda High.
There are two possibilities. First one, that it moves along its weakness and misses the islands. Second one, it continues moving W-WNW and encounters shearing problems as it moves over the islands.
I'm leaning more on the second probability because weak systems tend to continue W/WNW and become sheared when there's a trough nearby. That's not to say that once it moves away from the weakness, it keeps on heading toward the west and strengthens, but as of now, it does NOT look like a major threat towards the islands in terms of hurricane intensity.
Let's see how the different models pick up on this as it is now being called an invest...
0 likes
- WindRunner
- Category 5
- Posts: 5806
- Age: 34
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
- Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
- Contact:
- wxwatcher91
- Category 5
- Posts: 1606
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 2:43 pm
- Location: Keene, NH
- Contact:
- SkeetoBite
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 515
- Age: 59
- Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 8:25 am
- Contact:
000
WHXX01 KWBC 121202
CHGHUR
DISCLAIMER...NUMERICAL MODELS ARE SUBJECT TO LARGE ERRORS.
PLEASE REFER TO TPC/NHC OFFICIAL FORECASTS FOR TROPICAL CYCLONES.
.....THE FOLLOWING IS A TEST MESSAGE.....
NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER NORTH ATLANTIC OBJECTIVE AIDS FOR
TROPICAL DEPRESSION INVEST (AL962005) ON 20050812 1200 UTC
...00 HRS... ...12 HRS... ...24 HRS... ...36 HRS...
050812 1200 050813 0000 050813 1200 050814 0000
LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON
BAMD 10.7N 41.5W 11.2N 43.8W 11.7N 45.5W 12.4N 46.5W
BAMM 10.7N 41.5W 11.4N 43.4W 12.0N 44.9W 12.6N 45.9W
A98E 10.7N 41.5W 10.8N 44.1W 11.0N 46.8W 11.4N 49.1W
LBAR 10.7N 41.5W 11.1N 44.2W 12.2N 46.5W 13.6N 48.2W
SHIP 25KTS 29KTS 36KTS 44KTS
DSHP 25KTS 29KTS 36KTS 44KTS
...48 HRS... ...72 HRS... ...96 HRS... ..120 HRS...
050814 1200 050815 1200 050816 1200 050817 1200
LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON
BAMD 13.3N 47.4W 14.8N 49.0W 16.0N 50.9W 16.9N 53.4W
BAMM 13.2N 46.9W 13.7N 48.5W 13.8N 50.8W 13.5N 53.8W
A98E 12.0N 51.0W 13.6N 54.5W 15.1N 57.6W 17.2N 60.1W
LBAR 14.7N 49.5W 17.1N 50.6W 20.3N 52.3W 23.8N 55.5W
SHIP 52KTS 61KTS 67KTS 74KTS
DSHP 52KTS 61KTS 67KTS 74KTS
...INITIAL CONDITIONS...
LATCUR = 10.7N LONCUR = 41.5W DIRCUR = 270DEG SPDCUR = 14KT
LATM12 = 10.7N LONM12 = 37.5W DIRM12 = 270DEG SPDM12 = 19KT
LATM24 = 10.8N LONM24 = 31.7W
WNDCUR = 25KT RMAXWD = 0NM WNDM12 = 25KT
CENPRS = 1009MB OUTPRS = 1012MB OUTRAD = 150NM SDEPTH = D
RD34NE = 0NM RD34SE = 0NM RD34SW = 0NM RD34NW = 0NM
.....THE ABOVE HAS BEEN A TEST MESSAGE.....
WHXX01 KWBC 121202
CHGHUR
DISCLAIMER...NUMERICAL MODELS ARE SUBJECT TO LARGE ERRORS.
PLEASE REFER TO TPC/NHC OFFICIAL FORECASTS FOR TROPICAL CYCLONES.
.....THE FOLLOWING IS A TEST MESSAGE.....
NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER NORTH ATLANTIC OBJECTIVE AIDS FOR
TROPICAL DEPRESSION INVEST (AL962005) ON 20050812 1200 UTC
...00 HRS... ...12 HRS... ...24 HRS... ...36 HRS...
050812 1200 050813 0000 050813 1200 050814 0000
LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON
BAMD 10.7N 41.5W 11.2N 43.8W 11.7N 45.5W 12.4N 46.5W
BAMM 10.7N 41.5W 11.4N 43.4W 12.0N 44.9W 12.6N 45.9W
A98E 10.7N 41.5W 10.8N 44.1W 11.0N 46.8W 11.4N 49.1W
LBAR 10.7N 41.5W 11.1N 44.2W 12.2N 46.5W 13.6N 48.2W
SHIP 25KTS 29KTS 36KTS 44KTS
DSHP 25KTS 29KTS 36KTS 44KTS
...48 HRS... ...72 HRS... ...96 HRS... ..120 HRS...
050814 1200 050815 1200 050816 1200 050817 1200
LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON
BAMD 13.3N 47.4W 14.8N 49.0W 16.0N 50.9W 16.9N 53.4W
BAMM 13.2N 46.9W 13.7N 48.5W 13.8N 50.8W 13.5N 53.8W
A98E 12.0N 51.0W 13.6N 54.5W 15.1N 57.6W 17.2N 60.1W
LBAR 14.7N 49.5W 17.1N 50.6W 20.3N 52.3W 23.8N 55.5W
SHIP 52KTS 61KTS 67KTS 74KTS
DSHP 52KTS 61KTS 67KTS 74KTS
...INITIAL CONDITIONS...
LATCUR = 10.7N LONCUR = 41.5W DIRCUR = 270DEG SPDCUR = 14KT
LATM12 = 10.7N LONM12 = 37.5W DIRM12 = 270DEG SPDM12 = 19KT
LATM24 = 10.8N LONM24 = 31.7W
WNDCUR = 25KT RMAXWD = 0NM WNDM12 = 25KT
CENPRS = 1009MB OUTPRS = 1012MB OUTRAD = 150NM SDEPTH = D
RD34NE = 0NM RD34SE = 0NM RD34SW = 0NM RD34NW = 0NM
.....THE ABOVE HAS BEEN A TEST MESSAGE.....
0 likes
- Hyperstorm
- Category 5
- Posts: 1500
- Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 3:48 am
- Location: Ocala, FL
The SHIPS is strengthening the system fairly steadily and into a hurricane. So, accordingly, it follows the weakness to its north due to it being more vertically stacked.
I really can't see this developing as fast as it is developed by the SHIPS. We still don't see intense convection in the system and there is not a well-defined tight center. SAL is also there.
Until it consolidates, I won't put much into the models...
I really can't see this developing as fast as it is developed by the SHIPS. We still don't see intense convection in the system and there is not a well-defined tight center. SAL is also there.
Until it consolidates, I won't put much into the models...
0 likes
- bvigal
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 2276
- Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: British Virgin Islands
- Contact:
I've wondered about something concerning invests for a long time, and 96L this morning is a good example.
NHC 8am TWD mentions only "low amplitude low level signature", and no L drawn on 6z surface analysis, while NRL rates this "25kts-1009mb-107N-415W". Is this:
A. difference of opinion between NRL and NHC
B. time lag between 6z analysis and more recent posting by NRL
C. do they simply assign a 'best guess' value for each parameter (pressure, wind, location) whenever an invest is created?
Once a low pressure is mentioned by NHC, or even a named storm, the NRL numbers frequently disagree. But I've never heard an explanation.
NHC 8am TWD mentions only "low amplitude low level signature", and no L drawn on 6z surface analysis, while NRL rates this "25kts-1009mb-107N-415W". Is this:
A. difference of opinion between NRL and NHC
B. time lag between 6z analysis and more recent posting by NRL
C. do they simply assign a 'best guess' value for each parameter (pressure, wind, location) whenever an invest is created?
Once a low pressure is mentioned by NHC, or even a named storm, the NRL numbers frequently disagree. But I've never heard an explanation.
0 likes
-
- Tropical Storm
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 10:18 am
- Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
- Contact:
- Hyperstorm
- Category 5
- Posts: 1500
- Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 3:48 am
- Location: Ocala, FL
bvigal wrote:I've wondered about something concerning invests for a long time, and 96L this morning is a good example.
NHC 8am TWD mentions only "low amplitude low level signature", and no L drawn on 6z surface analysis, while NRL rates this "25kts-1009mb-107N-415W". Is this:
A. difference of opinion between NRL and NHC
B. time lag between 6z analysis and more recent posting by NRL
C. do they simply assign a 'best guess' value for each parameter (pressure, wind, location) whenever an invest is created?
Once a low pressure is mentioned by NHC, or even a named storm, the NRL numbers frequently disagree. But I've never heard an explanation.
Are you asking us to decipher the NHC?

NRL receives instructions from the NHC, basically. Whatever you see posted on their website, is because there has been coordination with the NHC for that. They wouldn't have a disparity.
Regarding the differences in analysis, I would give them time. The system is just getting its act together, so they don't have a clue as to where is the center, etc. They just put a center for the models to forecast from there, but that doesn't mean the center is exactly there. It's just a point.
Once the system develops, it's another story...
0 likes
- wxwatcher91
- Category 5
- Posts: 1606
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 2:43 pm
- Location: Keene, NH
- Contact:

wow 96L has a better circulation than Irene did for some time.
35 to 40kt winds in the QS...
...but not much to talk about convection-wise...
http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/post-goes
my bet is that the NHC will wait until some more convection starts forming... probably a TD tomorrow afternoon
0 likes
Don't be too quick to jump to TD status...tomorrow afternoon may be possible...but we all thought Irene would become a TD so quickly after it started to look good...yet it took several days.
This could spin up fast...or slowly organize.
Right now tho, it does seem like a good candidate, based on the scat.
This could spin up fast...or slowly organize.
Right now tho, it does seem like a good candidate, based on the scat.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], LarryWx, Stratton23 and 134 guests