6.6 quake near Micronesia Islands at West Pac

#1 Postby **cycloneye** » Sun Jan 16, 2005 6:53 pm

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqinthenews/2005/ustiaq/

Another Tsunami with this one? Hopefully this quake doesn't form one being much less strong than the December 26 9.0 near Sumatra.

depotoo · #2 Postby **depotoo** » Sun Jan 16, 2005 7:09 pm

wow - hope not either cycloneye!!!

Rainband · #3 Postby **Rainband** » Sun Jan 16, 2005 7:30 pm

Omg not again :eek:

Hopefully it was far enough underwater

#4 Postby **cycloneye** » Sun Jan 16, 2005 7:32 pm

Rainband wrote:Omg not again Hopefully it was far enough underwater

34 Miles deep in the water was the epicenter so I think that no Tsunami will form thankfully.

Rainband · #5 Postby **Rainband** » Sun Jan 16, 2005 7:34 pm

good

Ivanova · #6 Postby **Ivanova** » Sun Jan 16, 2005 8:36 pm

U.S. Nuclear Submarine Runs Aground

Sat Jan 8, 3:45 AM ET

HONOLULU - A nuclear submarine ran aground
about 350 miles south of Guam,
injuring several sailors, one of them critically,
the Navy said.

Link to article

****

Magnitude 6.6

Sunday, January 16, 2005 at 20:17:56 UTC
Monday, January 17, 2005 at 06:17:56 AM
local time at epicenter

320 miles WSW of HAGATNA, Guam

http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/bulletin/neic_tiaq.html

:eek:

#7 Postby **cycloneye** » Sun Jan 16, 2005 8:41 pm

That submarine incident occured well before the quake happened as I read the article.

Ivanova · #8 Postby **Ivanova** » Sun Jan 16, 2005 8:52 pm

cycloneye wrote:
That submarine incident occured well before the quake happened as I read the article.

Makes one wonder what the US submarine was really doing there...
or what it may have left behind... or is it all coincidential

*

#9 Postby **Stephanie** » Sun Jan 16, 2005 8:57 pm

Ivanova wrote:
cycloneye wrote:
That submarine incident occured well before the quake happened as I read the article.

Makes one wonder what the US submarine was really doing there...
or what it may have left behind... or is it all coincidential

*

What do YOU think Ivanova???

#10 Postby **cycloneye** » Sun Jan 16, 2005 8:57 pm

Are you saying with that comment that the US intentionally provoked the quake?

Ivanova · #11 Postby **Ivanova** » Sun Jan 16, 2005 9:03 pm

Stephanie wrote:

What do YOU think Ivanova???

I like to consider ALL the possibilities 8-)

*

Rainband · #12 Postby **Rainband** » Sun Jan 16, 2005 9:04 pm

Ivanova wrote:
cycloneye wrote:
That submarine incident occured well before the quake happened as I read the article.

Makes one wonder what the US submarine was really doing there...
or what it may have left behind... or is it all coincidential

*

Are you for freaking real!!!

The first quake caused the topography of the ocean floor to be changed thats why the sub ran aground. Your theory holds NO water and is insulting to me as an American :grr:

#13 Postby **Stephanie** » Sun Jan 16, 2005 9:05 pm

Ivanova wrote:
Stephanie wrote:

What do YOU think Ivanova???

I like to consider ALL the possibilities 8-)

*

Alrighty then... :roll:

Ivanova · #14 Postby **Ivanova** » Sun Jan 16, 2005 9:20 pm

Rainband wrote:
Are you for freaking real!!! The first quake caused the topography of the ocean floor to be changed thats why the sub ran aground. Your theory holds NO water and is insulting to me as an American

I tried to keep my discussion to my own topic..
but the moderator locked mine as a dup to this
topic... so I am posting here... if what I post
offends you, then don't read my posts !

*

Website · #15 Postby **Brent** » Sun Jan 16, 2005 9:24 pm

Ivanova wrote:
Stephanie wrote:

What do YOU think Ivanova???

I like to consider ALL the possibilities 8-)

*

YOU ARE A FREAK!!! So your one of those tinfoil-hat wearing conspiracy theorists. I suppose the Pentagon was also hit by a missile and the WTC was toppled by a bomb planted by the Government.

:roll:

Ivanova · #16 Postby **Ivanova** » Sun Jan 16, 2005 9:28 pm

Brent wrote:

YOU ARE A FREAK!!! So your one of those tinfoil-hat wearing conspiracy theorists. I suppose the Pentagon was also hit by a missile and the WTC was toppled by a bomb planted by the Government.

My my... all the nasty name calling.... tsk tsk... :roll:

methinks thou doth protest too much 8-)

*

#17 Postby **Stephanie** » Sun Jan 16, 2005 9:52 pm

Ivanova wrote:
Rainband wrote:
Are you for freaking real!!! The first quake caused the topography of the ocean floor to be changed thats why the sub ran aground. Your theory holds NO water and is insulting to me as an American

I tried to keep my discussion to my own topic..
but the moderator locked mine as a dup to this
topic... so I am posting here... if what I post
offends you, then don't read my posts !

*

Your topic was a duplication of his and that is why yours was locked.

It seems like you are the one that's doing all of the "discussing" in your topic.

Ivanova · #18 Postby **Ivanova** » Sun Jan 16, 2005 9:55 pm

Stephanie wrote:
Your topic was a duplication of his and that is why yours was locked.

It seems like you are the one that's doing all of the "discussing" in your topic.

Yup... considering my topic was locked 16 minutes after I posted it.

But it didn't quite compare with the open minded discussion
happening here :roll:

*

#19 Postby **Stephanie** » Sun Jan 16, 2005 10:07 pm

I noticed the timing on that and I don't doubt that it was an oversight.

All of your "conversations" are not as "open minded" on your end either. If you love mysteries and conspiracy theories, go write a book.

Ivanova · #20 Postby **Ivanova** » Sun Jan 16, 2005 10:28 pm

Stephanie wrote:
If you love mysteries and conspiracy theories, go write a book.

How about a movie ?

Deep Impact

8-)

6.6 quake near Micronesia Islands at West Pac

6.6 quake near Micronesia Islands at West Pac

Who is online