TeamPlayersBlue wrote:The 18z is ridiculous![]()
I wish we could save some of these runs. This one would make it to the Hall of Fame
Shows snow/sleet accumulation into Central Florida over Disney World. Lol.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
TeamPlayersBlue wrote:The 18z is ridiculous![]()
I wish we could save some of these runs. This one would make it to the Hall of Fame
South Texas Storms wrote:0z ARW and NMM (high res models) have really cut back on the rainfall totals for TX. NAM looks drier for the 35 corridor as well. Hope this isn't another disappointing rain event...
Cpv17 wrote:ThunderSleetDreams wrote:Heyoooooo 18z GFS. The upper air pattern and the Arctic drop an anvil on our heads with 48-96 hours below freezing depending on where you are.
It’s so cold it even has snow in the Gulf
South Texas Storms wrote:0z ARW and NMM (high res models) have really cut back on the rainfall totals for TX. NAM looks drier for the 35 corridor as well. Hope this isn't another disappointing rain event...
Brent wrote:South Texas Storms wrote:0z ARW and NMM (high res models) have really cut back on the rainfall totals for TX. NAM looks drier for the 35 corridor as well. Hope this isn't another disappointing rain event...
That would follow the trend
Haris wrote:If the models are such a headache less than 30 hours out, we can’t possibly take anything beyond 3 days remotely seriously. That’s why I’m not even bothering about any winter weather potential yet.
cheezyWXguy wrote:Brent wrote:South Texas Storms wrote:0z ARW and NMM (high res models) have really cut back on the rainfall totals for TX. NAM looks drier for the 35 corridor as well. Hope this isn't another disappointing rain event...
That would follow the trend
The conditions it shows look very favorable for severe weather tomorrow. VBV in the hodographs has been decreasing since the 12z, and the 0z is showing 400-500m2/s2 SRH values over dfw with 1000+ j/kg cape. HRRR is lower on SRH (2-300) but higher on instability (up to 2000)
Edit to add, it would be a shame to have to deal with all of this severe weather only to watch the one benefit, rainfall, go by the wayside
Haris wrote:cheezyWXguy wrote:Brent wrote:
That would follow the trend
The conditions it shows look very favorable for severe weather tomorrow. VBV in the hodographs has been decreasing since the 12z, and the 0z is showing 400-500m2/s2 SRH values over dfw with 1000+ j/kg cape. HRRR is lower on SRH (2-300) but higher on instability (up to 2000)
Edit to add, it would be a shame to have to deal with all of this severe weather only to watch the one benefit, rainfall, go by the wayside
Just in case you don’t know, I don’t live in Dallas. I’m down in Austin.
Brent wrote:South Texas Storms wrote:0z ARW and NMM (high res models) have really cut back on the rainfall totals for TX. NAM looks drier for the 35 corridor as well. Hope this isn't another disappointing rain event...
That would follow the trend
cheezyWXguy wrote:Brent wrote:South Texas Storms wrote:0z ARW and NMM (high res models) have really cut back on the rainfall totals for TX. NAM looks drier for the 35 corridor as well. Hope this isn't another disappointing rain event...
That would follow the trend
The conditions it shows look very favorable for severe weather tomorrow. VBV in the hodographs has been decreasing since the 12z, and the 0z is showing 400-500m2/s2 SRH values over dfw with 1000+ j/kg cape. HRRR is lower on SRH (2-300) but higher on instability (up to 2000)
Edit to add, it would be a shame to have to deal with all of this severe weather only to watch the one benefit, rainfall, go by the wayside
Haris wrote:cheezyWXguy wrote:Brent wrote:
That would follow the trend
The conditions it shows look very favorable for severe weather tomorrow. VBV in the hodographs has been decreasing since the 12z, and the 0z is showing 400-500m2/s2 SRH values over dfw with 1000+ j/kg cape. HRRR is lower on SRH (2-300) but higher on instability (up to 2000)
Edit to add, it would be a shame to have to deal with all of this severe weather only to watch the one benefit, rainfall, go by the wayside
Just in case you don’t know, I don’t live in Dallas. I’m down in Austin.
cheezyWXguy wrote:Haris wrote:cheezyWXguy wrote:The conditions it shows look very favorable for severe weather tomorrow. VBV in the hodographs has been decreasing since the 12z, and the 0z is showing 400-500m2/s2 SRH values over dfw with 1000+ j/kg cape. HRRR is lower on SRH (2-300) but higher on instability (up to 2000)
Edit to add, it would be a shame to have to deal with all of this severe weather only to watch the one benefit, rainfall, go by the wayside
Just in case you don’t know, I don’t live in Dallas. I’m down in Austin.
Haha sorry, I’m being a little self-absorbed about this event. It looks like the nam is holding the cap on you guys tomorrow. I know much you need the rain down there, I just hope of you get it, it doesn’t come with the severe weather too
harp wrote:0Z GFS!!!! Holy Moly!!! That's one hell of a fantasy!!
Users browsing this forum: wxman22 and 8 guests