#1474 Postby AnthonyC » Sat Feb 05, 2005 3:09 pm
R-Dub,
If you are trying to compare this latest storm with any past storms, I would look at the Nov. 1996 event. There are similarities, but also many differences. The Nov. 1996 event had a cold pool of air bottled in British Columbia, but since it was so early in the season, it wasn't true "arctic" air. Also, the surface low approached from the southwest and rapidly intensified...making landfall on the WA/OR border. But the Nov. 1996 had ALL dynamics come together...even the timing of the onset of precip. There was tremendous clearing the night before the event, and a cool airmass over Western Washington. That allowed temperatures to cool from 29-33 F when the clouds and precip finally moved onshore. Once the heavier precip began, evaporative cooling took place and temperatures dropped to about 30 F and stayed there until the precip stopped. I definitely don't think that will happen with this event for many reasons...1) there's not much cold air in British Columbia...2) I don't think the surface low will intensify that much...3) the surface low is expected to make landfall in northwest Oregon and then head southeast...instead of a due east direction...which we would truly benefit from.
Honestly, I didn't pay too much attention to the brush with lowland snow in the middle of Jan. 1996. But, Everett received nearly 4 inches from a strong PSCZ...I remember Steve Pool saying the heavy snow warning had finally dropped for the Hood Canal and Everett Vicinity. But I don't remember seeing any surface low on satellite maps...but like I said before, I didn't pay too much attention. The week after, once the arctic air invaded, things were different. Actually, my dad was talking about the big snowstorm on Superbowl 1996...he said we had about 6-7 inches on the ground.
Anthony
0 likes