wxman57 wrote:
The front was the result of the pattern change, not the cause.
Rats..I thought I was onto something...Rats...
Moderator: S2k Moderators
wxman57 wrote:
The front was the result of the pattern change, not the cause.
Portastorm wrote:I'm just going to throw this out there as I have minimal factual support to back up my opinion ... but I think we will see a pattern change around Feb. 20th or so ... maybe a little after. The existing pattern of a ridge-trough over the CONUS cannot last forever. In winter these patterns can and do lock in for a while but they usually don't last consecutively more than a month or so. I see one of two things happening: either the CONUS pattern relaxes to a more zonal flow which would mean drier and warmer for us in Texas OR we will see the mean trough position retrograde further west, placing Texas closer to the base of the trough and in a better location for cold air and storminess. The CFSv2 hints at this development. We'll see what happens.
wxman57 wrote:Brent wrote:Sure they get a cold pattern wrong but will nail a warm pattern...
I wouldn't say that, but I would say that any prediction of impending cold and/or winter weather in Texas needs to be backed up by something more than "the models are forecasting warm, they're often wrong that far out, so the real outcome must be cold".
What is going to break down that persistent low in the Gulf of Alaska or shift it much farther west, pumping the ridge up over the Pole vs. into western British Columbia?
dhweather wrote:Portastorm wrote:I'm just going to throw this out there as I have minimal factual support to back up my opinion ... but I think we will see a pattern change around Feb. 20th or so ... maybe a little after. The existing pattern of a ridge-trough over the CONUS cannot last forever. In winter these patterns can and do lock in for a while but they usually don't last consecutively more than a month or so. I see one of two things happening: either the CONUS pattern relaxes to a more zonal flow which would mean drier and warmer for us in Texas OR we will see the mean trough position retrograde further west, placing Texas closer to the base of the trough and in a better location for cold air and storminess. The CFSv2 hints at this development. We'll see what happens.
Two weeks out ....![]()
![]()
Portastorm wrote:wxman57 wrote:Brent wrote:Sure they get a cold pattern wrong but will nail a warm pattern...
I wouldn't say that, but I would say that any prediction of impending cold and/or winter weather in Texas needs to be backed up by something more than "the models are forecasting warm, they're often wrong that far out, so the real outcome must be cold".
What is going to break down that persistent low in the Gulf of Alaska or shift it much farther west, pumping the ridge up over the Pole vs. into western British Columbia?
Hey ... not fair ... I'm throwing a flag. 15 yards on wxman57 for unsportsmanlike conduct!![]()
I did preface my comments earlier today with the admission I had minimal factual support. As I said the pattern will either go zonal or the Eastern trough will retrograde some. You'd love the former, I'd love the latter. We shall see.
Portastorm wrote:dhweather wrote:Portastorm wrote:I'm just going to throw this out there as I have minimal factual support to back up my opinion ... but I think we will see a pattern change around Feb. 20th or so ... maybe a little after. The existing pattern of a ridge-trough over the CONUS cannot last forever. In winter these patterns can and do lock in for a while but they usually don't last consecutively more than a month or so. I see one of two things happening: either the CONUS pattern relaxes to a more zonal flow which would mean drier and warmer for us in Texas OR we will see the mean trough position retrograde further west, placing Texas closer to the base of the trough and in a better location for cold air and storminess. The CFSv2 hints at this development. We'll see what happens.
Two weeks out ....![]()
![]()
At least I didn't forecast a Cat 5 in the Gulf!
Portastorm wrote:Heh, the GFS can't even get the next 12 hours right lately. The overnight 0z run predicted AUS would have a high temp today of 46 and 0.05" of rainfall by now. Well, in reality the temperature never rose above 42 and KAUS has already received 0.25" of rainfall.
Portastorm wrote:Heh, the GFS can't even get the next 12 hours right lately. The overnight 0z run predicted KAUS would have a high temp today of 46 and 0.05" of rainfall by now. Well, in reality the temperature never rose above 42 and KAUS has already received 0.25" of rainfall.
Texas Snowman wrote:Off topic, but this is where most of our attention is at right now (the winter thread). So I thought I'd share this resource I came across today: a free, live streaming tornado forecasting workshop by Rich Thompson of the Storm Prediction Center.
Starts tonight, runs on Tuesday nights from Feb. 3 until April 21.
Here's the link:
http://live.som.ou.edu
amawea wrote:As a side note with the spring storm season approaching I thought I would post this site. The Storm Prediction Center in Norman Oklahoma is going to have classes available on site and online each Tuesday, Feb 3 thru April 21st from 7:30 to 9p.m. Don't worry if you can't view it live it will also be archived. It looks like a great opportunity.
Here's the link of the ad.
https://www.facebook.com/212222899921/p ... 22/?type=1
wxman57 wrote:Brent wrote:Sure they get a cold pattern wrong but will nail a warm pattern...
I wouldn't say that, but I would say that any prediction of impending cold and/or winter weather in Texas needs to be backed up by something more than "the models are forecasting warm, they're often wrong that far out, so the real outcome must be cold".
What is going to break down that persistent low in the Gulf of Alaska or shift it much farther west, pumping the ridge up over the Pole vs. into western British Columbia?
Portastorm wrote:wxman57 wrote:Brent wrote:Sure they get a cold pattern wrong but will nail a warm pattern...
I wouldn't say that, but I would say that any prediction of impending cold and/or winter weather in Texas needs to be backed up by something more than "the models are forecasting warm, they're often wrong that far out, so the real outcome must be cold".
What is going to break down that persistent low in the Gulf of Alaska or shift it much farther west, pumping the ridge up over the Pole vs. into western British Columbia?
Hey ... not fair ... I'm throwing a flag. 15 yards on wxman57 for unsportsmanlike conduct!![]()
I did preface my comments earlier today with the admission I had minimal factual support. As I said the pattern will either go zonal or the Eastern trough will retrograde some. You'd love the former, I'd love the latter. We shall see.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests