Forecasting the NAO: December through February Period

Winter Weather Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
donsutherland1
S2K Analyst
S2K Analyst
Posts: 2718
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:49 pm
Location: New York

Forecasting the NAO: December through February Period

#1 Postby donsutherland1 » Sun Nov 07, 2004 9:52 am

Many of the approaches employed for seasonal forecasting follow some combination of lagged SSTAs with some input for Northern Hemisphere snowcover.

http://www.metoffice.com/research/seaso ... ional/nao/

My hypothesis suggests that such an approach is too simplistic. Rather, a global look should produce better results. For one reason, just as teleconnections play a role in ridge-trough positions, I believe that there is some teleconnective impact with regard to the ridge-trough positions attributable to the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO).

After examining a large number of global indices, I have taken a small number of them and tested whether they would forecast an NAO that averaged below or above 0 for the December-February period.

The results are below:

Code: Select all

Winter   Forecast   Actual
1950-51   Positive   0.467
1951-52   Positive   0.767
1952-53   Positive   0.067
1953-54   Positive   0.700
1954-55   Negative   -0.033
1955-56   Positive   -0.467
1956-57   Positive   0.733
1957-58   Negative   -0.700
1958-59   Negative   -0.400
1959-60   Negative   -0.400
1960-61   Positive   0.600
1961-62   Positive   0.033
1962-63   Negative   -0.700
1963-64   Negative   -1.333
1964-65   Positive   -0.333
1965-66   Negative   -0.467
1966-67   Positive   0.600
1967-68   Negative   -0.300
1968-69   Negative   -0.967
1969-70   Negative   -0.200
1970-71   Positive   -0.767
1971-72   Positive   0.067
1972-73   Positive   0.800
1973-74   Positive   0.533
1974-75   Negative   0.000
1975-76   Positive   0.033
1976-77   Negative   -1.233
1977-78   Negative   -0.567
1978-79   Negative   -1.333
1979-80   Negative   0.067
1980-81   Positive   1.000
1981-82   Negative   -0.400
1982-83   Positive   0.700
1983-84   Positive   1.133
1984-85   Negative   -0.300
1985-86   Positive   0.100
1986-87   Positive   -0.300
1987-88   Positive   0.300
1988-89   Positive   0.733
1989-90   Negative   0.000
1990-91   Positive   0.867
1991-92   Positive   0.133
1992-93   Positive   0.567
1993-94   Positive   0.767
1994-95   Positive   0.900
1995-96   Negative   -0.467
1996-97   Positive   -0.067
1997-98   Negative   -0.567
1998-99   Positive   1.033
1999-00   Positive   1.200
2000-01   Negative   0.400
2001-02   Positive   0.333
2002-03   Negative   -0.300
2003-04   Positive   -0.100


Errors occurred in the following winters:

1955-56, 1964-65, 1970-71, 1974-75, 1979-80, 1986-87, 1989-90, 1996-97, 2000-01, and 2003-04

Consequently, in 44 of 54 cases (81.5%), the global approach correctly forecast whether the NAO would average above or below zero during the December-February period.

The link for one site that carries a seasonal NAO forecast pointed to a success rate of 66%. If this preliminary look at a global approach continues to bear out, it would mark a qualitative improvement over the simpler approaches, as it had an accuracy rate 23.5% above the 66% rate noted.

Winter 2004-05 could be a first test. The conventional approach points to a positive NAO. Right now, the global approach is pointing to an NAO that would average below 0 for the winter and that idea should be finalized by mid-November.
0 likes   

Return to “Winter Weather”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests