2/28-3/1/2005 Storm: Initial Estimates

Winter Weather Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
donsutherland1
S2K Analyst
S2K Analyst
Posts: 2718
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:49 pm
Location: New York

2/28-3/1/2005 Storm: Initial Estimates

#1 Postby donsutherland1 » Sun Feb 27, 2005 4:29 pm

On February 23, in the post concerning extreme blocks, I noted: Considering that February 2005 is all but certain to see the SOI average -10.00 or below and Winter 2004-05 was a weak El Niño winter (not a La Niña one), should the NAO drop to -5.500 or below in coming days, the probability of a Kocin-Uccellini snowstorm at some point as the extreme blocking episode begins to weaken could be high.

Per that study of extreme blocks and consistent guidance from the ECMWF/ECMWF ensembles/GFS ensembles, I believed that an offshore/coastal track was more likely than something punching inland, much less west of the Appalachians. Now, as we move into the eve of the event, and the strong model consensus that has more or less held firm, I have confidence that Winter 2004-05 is going to witness its second "Kocin-Uccellini" snowstorm of the season. This will likely also be a widespread event that could register a high 3 or even low 4 on the NESIS scale.

To be sure, I had envisioned an accumulating snow-changing to rain-ending as snow scenario for the big cities but had not expected that the amounts of snow would be as substantial as now appear likely. Larry Cosgrove had seen the full snowy potential for days out end, so his medium-range outlook is noted for its excellence.

At 18z, the NAM continued its slow but steady march toward the GFS and the offshore/coastal model consensus. Earlier, I had been wary of the NAM even as I gave it far less weight than the other models on this event. With its continuing eastward trend, my concern is much reduced.

As of now, my initial estimates for total snowfall (even considering changeover issues in some of the areas) are as follows:

Armonk: 12"-18"
Babylon: 6"-12"
Baltimore: 6"-12"
Boston: 6"-12"
Morristown: 12"-20"
New York City: 8"-16"
Newark: 8"-16"
Philadelphia: 7"-14"
Poughkeepsie: 8"-14"
Providence: 6"-10"
Richmond: 2"-5"
Trenton: 8"-16"
Washington, DC: 5"-10"
White Plains: 10"-18"
Winchester: 4"-8"
0 likes   

RestonVA
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 45
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 1:52 pm

#2 Postby RestonVA » Sun Feb 27, 2005 4:53 pm

any chances on those numbers for DC and the NW burbs going up? (I'm about 20 miles west of DC)
0 likes   

EXTONPA
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 143
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 9:23 pm

#3 Postby EXTONPA » Sun Feb 27, 2005 5:13 pm

latest GFS shifts storm track westward....looks like big cities, including Jersey will see minor to moderate snow accumulations at most, with heaviest snows in interior New England.

1-2 Baltimore
2-4 Philly
3-5 NYC
0 likes   

EXTONPA
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 143
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 9:23 pm

#4 Postby EXTONPA » Sun Feb 27, 2005 5:15 pm

whenever a Noreaster cuts up over buzzards bay general rule is rain in big cities and snow in interior northeast....
0 likes   

User avatar
ohiostorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1582
Age: 40
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 2:51 pm
Location: Orlando, FL
Contact:

#5 Postby ohiostorm » Sun Feb 27, 2005 5:17 pm

How bout us here in the midwest? Got any estimates for us?
0 likes   

donsutherland1
S2K Analyst
S2K Analyst
Posts: 2718
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:49 pm
Location: New York

#6 Postby donsutherland1 » Sun Feb 27, 2005 7:14 pm

Just a note...

The 18z GFS does not shift significantly west of its 12z run. Here's the 18z run for 3/1 0z:

Image

The following is the 12z run for 3/1 0z.

Image

Notice that the positions are almost identical.
0 likes   

krysof

#7 Postby krysof » Sun Feb 27, 2005 7:18 pm

that will likely change again by 0z which is a much more accurate model analysis
0 likes   

donsutherland1
S2K Analyst
S2K Analyst
Posts: 2718
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:49 pm
Location: New York

#8 Postby donsutherland1 » Sun Feb 27, 2005 7:18 pm

Akron: 3"-7"
Cleveland: 4"-8"
0 likes   

donsutherland1
S2K Analyst
S2K Analyst
Posts: 2718
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:49 pm
Location: New York

#9 Postby donsutherland1 » Sun Feb 27, 2005 7:19 pm

Krysof,

As far as I'm concerned, there was great continuity between the 12z and 18z runs of the GFS. I expect few changes at 0z. The overall ideas expressed at the beginning of this thread look to be in good shape.

If anything, the 0z NAM will probably continue its eastward shift.
0 likes   

WXBUFFJIM
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1971
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2003 11:02 am
Location: Baltimore

#10 Postby WXBUFFJIM » Sun Feb 27, 2005 7:20 pm

Yea, nothing has changed with respect to the GFS. I see no westward shift from one run to the next. Seems like everything remains on track. If GFS solution is correct, 6-12" in Baltimore would verify and even locally heavier amounts are possible in heavier mesoscale banding features. Will see. The exact track is key.

Jim
0 likes   

donsutherland1
S2K Analyst
S2K Analyst
Posts: 2718
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:49 pm
Location: New York

#11 Postby donsutherland1 » Sun Feb 27, 2005 7:22 pm

Absolutely right, Jim. For many, a very exciting storm is in store.
0 likes   

al79philly
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 113
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:19 pm

#12 Postby al79philly » Sun Feb 27, 2005 7:50 pm

Don thanks for turning me on to the NESIS scale... I had never heard of it before this. Anyone who loves the snow should read this paper - http://www.weatheranswer.com/public/NES ... s%20scale' - it is very interesting.
0 likes   

Planetsnow
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 97
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 12:56 pm

#13 Postby Planetsnow » Sun Feb 27, 2005 7:59 pm

Don.....can you estimate snow amounts for Rochester, NY including LES?
0 likes   

JRwx
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 12:34 pm
Location: Adrian, MI

#14 Postby JRwx » Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:16 pm

Don, any idea on what things will look like for accumulations with the midwest low near detroit?
0 likes   

donsutherland1
S2K Analyst
S2K Analyst
Posts: 2718
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:49 pm
Location: New York

#15 Postby donsutherland1 » Sun Feb 27, 2005 11:02 pm

Planetsnow,

3"-6" general snowfall. After that, it will depend where the bands set up. Those areas could see significantly more snow due to the LES. Unfortunately, it is not really possible to highlight in advance specific areas for such banding.
0 likes   

donsutherland1
S2K Analyst
S2K Analyst
Posts: 2718
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:49 pm
Location: New York

#16 Postby donsutherland1 » Sun Feb 27, 2005 11:03 pm

JRwx,

2"-4" is probably a good bet for the Detroit area.
0 likes   

Mike2002
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 9:50 pm

#17 Postby Mike2002 » Sun Feb 27, 2005 11:05 pm

Don--do you see Richmond just getting around one inch of slush before changing over to all rain tomorrow morning??
0 likes   

donsutherland1
S2K Analyst
S2K Analyst
Posts: 2718
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:49 pm
Location: New York

#18 Postby donsutherland1 » Sun Feb 27, 2005 11:32 pm

Mike,

I have Richmond at 2"-5". We'll see. This is tough and I may be out on a limb on that one. Time will tell.
0 likes   

EXTONPA
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 143
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 9:23 pm

#19 Postby EXTONPA » Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:07 am

Good call on the snow amounts Sutherland!
0 likes   

donsutherland1
S2K Analyst
S2K Analyst
Posts: 2718
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:49 pm
Location: New York

Re: 2/28-3/1/2005 Storm: Initial Estimates

#20 Postby donsutherland1 » Thu Mar 03, 2005 9:32 pm

The tragedy of a massive bust: February 28-March 1, 2005 Storm:

Armonk: 12"-18"; Actual: 7.1"
Babylon: 6"-12"; Actual: 6.8" (Islip)
Baltimore: 6"-12"; Actual: 3.2"
Boston: 6"-12"; Actual: 8.1"
Morristown: 12"-20"; Actual: 9.5"
New York City: 8"-16"; Actual: 7.7"
Newark: 8"-16"; Actual: 9.4"
Philadelphia: 7"-14"; Actual: 5.6"
Poughkeepsie: 8"-14"; Actual: 6.4"
Providence: 6"-10"; Actual: 6.8"
Richmond: 2"-5"; Actual: 0.3"
Trenton: 8"-16"; Actual: 6.3"
Washington, DC: 5"-10"; Actual: 2.2"
White Plains: 10"-18"; Actual: 7.1"
Winchester: 4"-8"; Actual: 5.0"

10/15 were busts.
0 likes   


Return to “Winter Weather”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: wxman22 and 11 guests