February 11-12, 2006 Snowstorm: Initial Estimates
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.

-
- S2K Analyst
- Posts: 2718
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:49 pm
- Location: New York
February 11-12, 2006 Snowstorm: Initial Estimates
At this point in time, I believe a large portion of the U.S. East Coast extending from Washington, DC to Portland, ME will be facing an appreciable to significant snowfall.
∙ This storm will have a larger impact than I had first anticipated following yesterday's 12z run of the GFS. The rapidly developing low will track off the Delmarva and not along it. Hence, a greater prospect for heavier snows will exist for Philadelphia into New York City.
∙ After having reviewed the 12z guidance, a track between the 2/9 12z GFS and ECMWF looks good and is within the spread I had been relying on since last evening between the 2/8 12z GFS and 2/8 12z ECMWF. The NAM is a westward outlier and its solution has been discounted but not entirely written off.
∙ Mixing issues could extend as far north as New York City, coastal Connecticut, Long Island, Cape Cod, and Nantucket. In Philadelphia and New York City, such mixing will probably not be long-lived.
∙ There is still some uncertainty and, if I had to place odds, a track somewhat farther offshore is probably more likely than one that would more closely resemble the 2/9 12z NAM.
∙ Depending on the storm's exact track, some significant changes might be required for some of the initial estimates e.g., only a small shift to the south and east could bring moderate or greater accumulations to the greater Richmond area.
Initial Snowfall Estimates:
Albany: 3"-7"
Baltimore: 3"-7"
Boston: 8"-14"
Concord: 6"-10"
Hagerstown: 5"-10"
Hartford: 5"-10"
Islip: 3"-7"
New York City: 5"-10"
Newark: 5"-10"
Philadelphia: 4"-8"
Portland: 5"-10"
Providence: 6"-12"
Richmond: 2" or less
Washington, DC:
DCA: 3"-6"
IAD: 3"-7"
Worcester: 8"-14"
∙ This storm will have a larger impact than I had first anticipated following yesterday's 12z run of the GFS. The rapidly developing low will track off the Delmarva and not along it. Hence, a greater prospect for heavier snows will exist for Philadelphia into New York City.
∙ After having reviewed the 12z guidance, a track between the 2/9 12z GFS and ECMWF looks good and is within the spread I had been relying on since last evening between the 2/8 12z GFS and 2/8 12z ECMWF. The NAM is a westward outlier and its solution has been discounted but not entirely written off.
∙ Mixing issues could extend as far north as New York City, coastal Connecticut, Long Island, Cape Cod, and Nantucket. In Philadelphia and New York City, such mixing will probably not be long-lived.
∙ There is still some uncertainty and, if I had to place odds, a track somewhat farther offshore is probably more likely than one that would more closely resemble the 2/9 12z NAM.
∙ Depending on the storm's exact track, some significant changes might be required for some of the initial estimates e.g., only a small shift to the south and east could bring moderate or greater accumulations to the greater Richmond area.
Initial Snowfall Estimates:
Albany: 3"-7"
Baltimore: 3"-7"
Boston: 8"-14"
Concord: 6"-10"
Hagerstown: 5"-10"
Hartford: 5"-10"
Islip: 3"-7"
New York City: 5"-10"
Newark: 5"-10"
Philadelphia: 4"-8"
Portland: 5"-10"
Providence: 6"-12"
Richmond: 2" or less
Washington, DC:
DCA: 3"-6"
IAD: 3"-7"
Worcester: 8"-14"
0 likes
-
- Tropical Low
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 3:42 pm
-
- Tropical Storm
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2004 11:25 am
- Location: CHARLOTTE,N.C.
- tomboudreau
- Category 5
- Posts: 1869
- Age: 48
- Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2003 6:07 pm
- Location: Carnegie, PA
- Contact:
-
- S2K Analyst
- Posts: 2718
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:49 pm
- Location: New York
Bob,
If I believed that the Atlanta and Charlotte areas, etc., were to receive more than perhaps some flurries--and I hope later model runs will support such a proposition, because I know that there are people in the Southeast who are starved for snow and it would be nice if some snow fell there--I would definitely post on it, just as I posted my thoughts on the recent Ohio Valley/Ontario storm.
I do believe parts of North Carolina, Tennessee, and northern most GA (probably the higher elevations) might see some snow but the uncertainty in those areas is quite great. Charlotte has some chance but we'll see what the later guidance shows. Western NC has a good chance.
Best wishes.
If I believed that the Atlanta and Charlotte areas, etc., were to receive more than perhaps some flurries--and I hope later model runs will support such a proposition, because I know that there are people in the Southeast who are starved for snow and it would be nice if some snow fell there--I would definitely post on it, just as I posted my thoughts on the recent Ohio Valley/Ontario storm.
I do believe parts of North Carolina, Tennessee, and northern most GA (probably the higher elevations) might see some snow but the uncertainty in those areas is quite great. Charlotte has some chance but we'll see what the later guidance shows. Western NC has a good chance.
Best wishes.
0 likes
-
- S2K Analyst
- Posts: 2718
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:49 pm
- Location: New York
- Stephanie
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 23843
- Age: 63
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:53 am
- Location: Glassboro, NJ
JETSTREAM BOB wrote:Northeast,Northeast,Northeast....The south is part of the USA also...please report on the south once in awhile.........will we get any snow this weekend?????
Um, first of all, that's rude. Second of all, the storm is reforming off of the DELMARVA peninsula and he's reporting on the snow totals from as far south as Richmond which will be getting at this time, 2 inches or less. So, I sincerely DOUBT that anything south of Richmond will be getting anything but flurries.
Here's an idea, why don't YOU try a prediction?
0 likes
donsutherland1 wrote:Bob,
If I believed that the Atlanta and Charlotte areas, etc., were to receive more than perhaps some flurries--and I hope later model runs will support such a proposition, because I know that there are people in the Southeast who are starved for snow and it would be nice if some snow fell there--I would definitely post on it, just as I posted my thoughts on the recent Ohio Valley/Ontario storm.
I do believe parts of North Carolina, Tennessee, and northern most GA (probably the higher elevations) might see some snow but the uncertainty in those areas is quite great. Charlotte has some chance but we'll see what the later guidance shows. Western NC has a good chance.
Best wishes.
That's us (Atlanta)....always the bridesmaid (cold winter rain), never the bride (snowfall of any kind).


I hate it that we haven't had a decent snowfall here in a couple of years. It's hard to see other areas get snow, year in, year out...and we just get teased with predictions of snow that never happen.
I know this sounds evil...but in a way, it's been kind of oh..interesting to watch people in other parts of the country--who are used to getting snow most winters--finally get a first hand experience with Snow Deprivation Syndrome.
It's not that I begrudge anyone their snow...I don't, and I'm glad more than a few are finally going to get a good storm this weekend. It's well deserved for those who've waited all winter and been patient for the right storm to come along.
It's just that maybe some will finally understand why we Southerners go bonkers over (what to them would be) a light dusting of snow. Being snow starved is basically our normal state....
However, this year *everyone* has joined the south in our misery.
And we all know misery loves company.

That said....
Ya'll enjoy your snow, take lots of pics....and post links to webcams so we can have some fun with you.

*hugs*
Jen
0 likes
-
- S2K Analyst
- Posts: 2718
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:49 pm
- Location: New York
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Several quick evening thoughts:
∙ The NAM's colder solution and track reasonably close to the GFS may well be suggesting that the GFS has scored a big victory among the models in holding firmly to its coastal snowstorm solution.
∙ General agreement between the 18z GFS, 2/10 0z NAM, earlier GFS ensembles is now quite good. I believe an out-to-sea track along the lines of the 12z GGEM is probably now an increasingly low risk. Overall, I've liked a compromise between the GFS and ECMWF and that seems to be the ballpark. Anything south and east of the ECMWF seems increasingly unlikely.
∙ With a stronger push of cold air per the NAM's solution, hope is definitely increasing for snow lovers in Richmond down into parts of North Carolina
∙ The NAM indicates that snowfall rates could reach 1"/1.5" per hour in Philadelphia, Newark, NYC, among other locations.
Revised figures will probably be posted at some point tomorrow. Right now, if anything, figures are more likely to be revised upward than downward.
P.S. Jen, I feel for you without the snow. Hopefully, things can change and sooner rather than later.
Several quick evening thoughts:
∙ The NAM's colder solution and track reasonably close to the GFS may well be suggesting that the GFS has scored a big victory among the models in holding firmly to its coastal snowstorm solution.
∙ General agreement between the 18z GFS, 2/10 0z NAM, earlier GFS ensembles is now quite good. I believe an out-to-sea track along the lines of the 12z GGEM is probably now an increasingly low risk. Overall, I've liked a compromise between the GFS and ECMWF and that seems to be the ballpark. Anything south and east of the ECMWF seems increasingly unlikely.
∙ With a stronger push of cold air per the NAM's solution, hope is definitely increasing for snow lovers in Richmond down into parts of North Carolina
∙ The NAM indicates that snowfall rates could reach 1"/1.5" per hour in Philadelphia, Newark, NYC, among other locations.
Revised figures will probably be posted at some point tomorrow. Right now, if anything, figures are more likely to be revised upward than downward.
P.S. Jen, I feel for you without the snow. Hopefully, things can change and sooner rather than later.
0 likes
-
- S2K Analyst
- Posts: 2718
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:49 pm
- Location: New York
Re: February 11-12, 2006 Snowstorm: Initial Estimates
Some additional estimates where I believe there will be at least some accumulations of snow:
Asheville: 1"-3"
Boone: 1"-3"
Chattanooga: 1"-3"
Hickory: 1"-3"
Knoxville: 2"-5"
Lexington: 2"-5"
Nashville: 1"-3"
Asheville: 1"-3"
Boone: 1"-3"
Chattanooga: 1"-3"
Hickory: 1"-3"
Knoxville: 2"-5"
Lexington: 2"-5"
Nashville: 1"-3"
0 likes
- WaitingForSiren
- Category 1
- Posts: 383
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 12:58 pm
- Location: Minneapolis,Minnesota
- Contact:
A map
Donsutherland1, your predictions seem to imply a map something like this:
Is this what you mean? Numbers are in inches.

Is this what you mean? Numbers are in inches.
0 likes
-
- S2K Analyst
- Posts: 2718
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:49 pm
- Location: New York
- Tri-State_1925
- Category 1
- Posts: 341
- Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 11:16 am
- Location: Worcester Hills, MA
Don, is this expected to be a fast-moving storm or a slower-moving one?
It seems to me that the speed of noreasters are often a more important factor in snowfall totals for interior NE areas than storm track, yet storm duration takes a back seat to storm track. Also, it seems like storm duration is incorrectly forecasted more often than not. I can recall several examples of that going back to the mid-90's. Your thoughts?
It seems to me that the speed of noreasters are often a more important factor in snowfall totals for interior NE areas than storm track, yet storm duration takes a back seat to storm track. Also, it seems like storm duration is incorrectly forecasted more often than not. I can recall several examples of that going back to the mid-90's. Your thoughts?
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: wxman22 and 12 guests